| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 08/09/2016 3:56:48 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 08/08/2016 4:38:41 PM PDT by um1990
The 1700's just called! They didn't ask for their jurisprudence back. They said we could keep it for as long as we needed it.
It’ll be a year or more before this sees the inside of a courtroom.
There is an article on it at NBC News:
I wonder if will be medically “retired” before November. She appears to be tanking fast.
She’ll just pull a few million out the Clinton Foundation to settle up.
It’ll be dismissed for lack of standing.
Only halfway kidding, what with all those Clinton appointees on the bench.
Correct. The MSM would ride that horse until election day. There would story after story about the poor parents, a la Cindy Sheehan, dissecting every facet of their loss, celebrating them as victims with unassailable moral authority.
Who are "they" and why would they be barred from their free speech...?
True
But she doesn’t have benefit of fifth amendment protection. Looks like perjury may also be in play
And here is the link to the article on Fox News:
“actually, they are after discovery”
Good! Let people know what Hillary is really like.
How can you tell she’s a witch?
Hopefully Sam Bacile, the innocent man that was jailed as a scapegoat by Barack and Hillary, also sues.
By “they,” I mean parents of the two Benghazi victims. It is not uncommon for parties in legal proceedings to be barred by the judge from speaking publicly about the case while the trial is going on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.