Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki
Dumb, dumb, dumb.

1. 747s are civilian aircraft without the redundancy and strength requirements of military aircraft. Loading one up with nukes and waiting for one to inevitably crash is incredibly stupid. How many 747s have already crashed into mountains/piled into the sea so far?

2.When one 747 is used for carrying nuclear weapons ALL 747s become potential targets by enemy forces. How would you like to be aboard a civilian airliner when the "balloon goes up"?

6 posted on 08/05/2016 4:39:55 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chainmail

The range of an ICBM should negate any disadvantage the 747 has; How many countries can target/track a 747 launching missiles 5,000 miles away?


8 posted on 08/05/2016 5:00:50 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Chainmail
1. 747s are civilian aircraft without the redundancy and strength requirements of military aircraft. Loading one up with nukes and waiting for one to inevitably crash is incredibly stupid. How many 747s have already crashed into mountains/piled into the sea so far?

According to Wikipedia, there have been 60 hull-losses of 747’s, less than 4% of the total built. And many of these were hijackings, blown up, stuck by lightning, hitting another plane on the ground (Tenerife), etc.

Possibly a better record than the B-52’s.

15 posted on 08/05/2016 12:26:16 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson