Once again, The Donald has picked the right person to target in his rhetoric to stop the importation of Muslim Brotherhood and Shari’ah law.
Shari’ah law cannot occupy the same venue as US Constitutional law or English Common Law. It is diametrically opposed to almost all Western law codes, and to attempt to include parts of Shari’ah law is to end up with irreconcilable contradictions. There is no mercy, no appeal, and very little of justice anywhere in Shari’ah law, which is predicated upon rendering revenge on those of whom Mohammed Ali considered to be his blood enemies.
And that is just about everybody who chose to resist becoming a Muslim. Or anybody who is not the “right kind” of Muslim. Muslims frequently murder other Muslims, for what are the most trifling of reasons, or so it would seem to an outsider who is not up on the “inside baseball” of Islam.
Human Abedin and Valerie Jarrett both muslim sympathisers,both top aides,one for Obama one for Hillary
If he hasn’t already done so, it would be interesting for Trump to point out to Khan, via tweet or other public means that according to the Quran, 9:123, if his son, who apparently professed to be a Muslim, is indeed an American hero then at least in his final moments his son became an apostate.
9:123 O Believers, fight [q-t-l] with these disbelievers who are near you, and they should find you firm and stern. (In Sura 9:123, the hypocrites have been merged with the unbelievers, so they are now apostates.)
Then the question is whether the Muslim Khan remains proud of his son?
As a matter of fact, was his son decorated for his final actions, or were those actions so negligent as to suggest he acted like a suicide bomber?
Perhaps Khan is today especially proud of his son because his son died as a dedicated Muslim.