Surprise Fail – Reuters Announces Poll Changes To Help Lift Hillary Clinton…

The Conservative Treehouse ^ | July 29, 2016 | sundance

[LS]

Well, that’s my point. They aren’t “likely” if originally they said “neither” and they were pushed to make a choice. Those are Bernie voters.

[ScaniaBoy]

As was said yesterday, that poll (and probably a lot of others) is a scam.

[erlayman]

There was another option for Not Voting. Neither was essentially the same as Other in a Clinton/Trump matchup. Eliminating the terminology is less important to getting a true picture of the race than adding the names of the other candidates.

[cidrasm]

They are counting on the lemming vote .... that if people see that Hillary is in the lead people will want to vote for a ‘winner’. There is some truth to this. Some people who are undecided until the last minute will vote for the candidate who appears will be the winner. People like voting for a winner because they then see themselves as on the winning side. It’s odd but it is a thing.

This is absolutely a thing and it manifests itself in uninformed people who have no clue what the candidates are about, policies, positions, etc. They truly vote sheep-like for the perceived front-runner to feel like they are a part of it. Unfortunately, poll taxes and tests were ruled unconstitutional.