[rktman]

WOW! Almost exactly word for word. Oh, wait. Not so much. Generally, conveying the same message. Plagiarism? I think not. Besides, I believe mookies was a pile of horse manure. And, apparently, mookies was pulled from a previous speech years earlier. So, hello kettle. (can I say that?) The libs are really stretching here. But that's what alinskyites do.

[polymuser]

Sounds like the War on Women...

[Hugh the Scot]

Dear MSM,

I do not care.

-Hugh

[SERKIT]

[combat_boots]

Hmmm.

Well, using this logic, MO’s mojo with words brought on 0bama, so....Melania’s.....

[Gargantua]

There’s no way Melania stole Moochelle’s speech. While Melania speaks five languages fluently, I happen to know that “Ebonics” isn’t among them.

[tillacum]

Well the nit picking has begun. From now on we will hear about her clothes, and all the other stuff to tray and make her look be like the flabber mouthed presstitutes.

[Redwood71]

Why do you think the charges flew around? Same old democratic cr@p, if you can’t dispute the message, you try to destroy the messenger. Smoke and mirrors.

It is not plagiarism by definition, It would never float in court for five minutes. The control of a speech is not a written form, but if Mrs. Trumo is charged, so should Michele Obama as she used the same product in her speech and it wa within the 70 year limit of control. Course, neither one of them used the speech for financial gain, especially Mrs. Trump. Mr. Trump will be taking a paycut to do the job as president.

red

[mom.mom]

Melania is nice, smart and gorgeous. She has immunity.

Our side has Melania and yours does not.