Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, Loretta Lynch Was Not 'Ambushed' by Bill Clinton
americanthinker.com ^ | 7/4/2016 | Jonathan F. Keiler

Posted on 07/04/2016 6:56:30 AM PDT by rktman

Sifting through the facts slowly emerging from the tattered veil of secrecy surrounding the tarmac meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton, it is likely that the popular narrative that the Attorney General was ambushed is false. In all likelihood, General Lynch had an important agenda that needed to be communicated immediately to Team Hillary.

Last week I wrote a piece reasonably speculating that Lynch’s meeting with Clinton meant that the FBI would shortly refer charges to Justice, and that Lynch met Clinton to break the bad news and reassure him that nothing would come of it under her watch. Since that article was published new information has come to light, but none that would undermine its central premise. That Hillary Clinton was finally interviewed by FBI agents on Saturday strongly suggests that not only was Lynch’s meeting with Clinton prearranged, but reinforces the idea that their discussion improperly focused on the FBI’s investigation of Hillary.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: New York
KEYWORDS: arizona; criminalacts; criminalconspiracy; crookedhillary; fbi; jamescomey; liars; lorettalynch; phoenix; treasonous
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
Still lookin' for the light at the end of the tunnel. As I said before somewhere on one of the threads, this 'hole' thing is an insult and a slap in the face to, probably, millions of Americans who worked with classified information with the full knowledge that even losing by accident, classified information could cost you your job at the very least and at worst could land them in jail and paying a big fine. Mrs. rktman and I both worked in jobs where we understood the obligation of safe guarding certain information and material. We would have face consequences for a breach such as this. The special folks, apparently not so much.
1 posted on 07/04/2016 6:56:30 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Why hasn’t Barry fired her a%&?


2 posted on 07/04/2016 7:03:04 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
The analysis makes sense. Lynch and Clinton meet. FBI questions Hillary.

At best it was a “heads up” warning to the Clintons, at worse it was reassurance,”I wont prosecute,” or passing information received from a sympathetic FBI cross-dresser.

3 posted on 07/04/2016 7:03:47 AM PDT by Awgie (Progressives should be called RE-GRESSIVES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Probably not on topic, but what was Hillary’s college thesis about? And why did she have it sealed from public view in 1969? Sounds paranoid to me.


4 posted on 07/04/2016 7:04:54 AM PDT by This I Wonder32460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Did she have her knee pads with her?


5 posted on 07/04/2016 7:05:09 AM PDT by umgud (ban muslims, not guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

And the lap dog media just sits quietly waiting for the next command from their master.


6 posted on 07/04/2016 7:05:58 AM PDT by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Did she kiss it?

This may be the first documentable case in which Bill Clinton was alone with a woman and she wasn't sexually assaulted.

7 posted on 07/04/2016 7:06:00 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Lynch is no “General.” She is Attorney General which makes her the chief attorney for the U.S. Government, not a General.


8 posted on 07/04/2016 7:06:37 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

I would say that she at least kissed it.


9 posted on 07/04/2016 7:06:52 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The damage, and great damage it is the Lib media notwithstanding, has already been done. No matter the final outcome she loses this fight.

The damage from an indictment or even a recommendation for indictment is obvious but even no recommendation to indict stinks to high heaven of a massive cover-up and will only turn more people against her.

Those who previously supported her would not change their mind under any circumstances but those on the fence can already see what is happening here what with Clinton and Lynch meeting.


10 posted on 07/04/2016 7:07:18 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

I read somewhere that Lynch’s husband was present. Does anyone know?


11 posted on 07/04/2016 7:08:23 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Me included to a lesser degree. It was very clear to me that the full force of the Federal govt would used against me if I made a mistake. Heck, if I knowingly broke the law it would be even worse. It meant huge fines and jail time.

I am waiting with bated breath to see how this turns out.


12 posted on 07/04/2016 7:08:46 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

You would think there would be some other, more discrete, way for them to communicate. Burner phone anyone?


13 posted on 07/04/2016 7:08:56 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

14 posted on 07/04/2016 7:09:02 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Let’s hope that there is a whistle blower if it looks like she is going to skirt.


15 posted on 07/04/2016 7:11:01 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Awgie

Wouldn’t the old-fashioned way of just passing a note to an “accidental” encounter at a bench in the park been a LITTLE more discreet?

But I forget. “Discreet” is not the way of the Power Couple or the Current Regime. Brass knuckles, smash-mouth, take no prisoners, in your face, are all tactics of first choice with them. So what’cha gonna do about it, sucker?

There is no way to apply a < /sarcasm > tag to that.


16 posted on 07/04/2016 7:11:45 AM PDT by alloysteel (Of course you will live in interesting times, Nobody has a choice, now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

Yup. It even states that in the non-disclosure statements we signed.


17 posted on 07/04/2016 7:13:17 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

Obama should just announce that, no matter what, he will give Hillary a full pardon before leaving office. So, y’know, no worries. [/s]


18 posted on 07/04/2016 7:14:42 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“...not ambushed...”

Absolutely not. Lynch was the messenger sent by Obama to tip off Hillary prior to the FBI questioning via Bill.

Let us pray that the FBI is not infiltrated yet. I am concerned about the reports that they were there on the tarmac and gave the appearance of co operation by not allowing pictures.

I hope this is not indicative of anything.


19 posted on 07/04/2016 7:14:55 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Michele wants her fired for wearing hideous clothes that don't fit
and for cramming her size 11 wide feet into size 8 narrow shoes.

20 posted on 07/04/2016 7:15:09 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PACE A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson