Posted on 07/03/2016 4:08:01 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
During a brief interview on MSNBC, Clinton said she was "eager" to speak to authorities and "pleased to have the opportunity" to assist the Justice Department.
Clinton would not say, however, if she has been told whether or not charges would be filed against her.
"I am not going to comment on the process," she told Chuck Todd, just hours after she was interviewed by the FBI.
"I have no knowledge of any timeline," she added. "This is entirely up to the department."
Clinton reiterated that she never sent or received material marked classified on her private server.
"I'm going to continue to put forth my record," she said, "what I have stood for and do everything I can to earn the trust of the voters of our country."
Clinton also said she learned about a meeting between her husband, former President Bill Clinton, and Attorney General Loretta Lynch at the Phoenix airport earlier this week "in the news."
She described it as a "short, chance meeting" that was "purely social."
"Obviously no one wants to see any untoward conclusions drawn," Clinton added. "They said they wouldn't do it again."
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
The REVIEW goes on.
short, chance meeting
More BS.
Average slobs don’t get to wander around on the tarmac at airports,it a restricted area.
Lynch went to this airport to specificity meet with impeached and disbarred Bill Clinton.
If you feel are injured by this incident, you may be able to sue under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Historically, under the doctrine of “sovereign immunity,” you were not permitted to sue the king. Sovereign immunity has carried over to modern times in the form of a general rule that you cannot sue the government — unless the government says you can.
Fortunately, the Federal Tort Claims Act (”FTCA”) allows certain kinds of lawsuits against federal employees who are acting within the scope of their employment. And not doing their job to protect the US from high crimes and misdemeaners is one of them,
If you believe you may have a claim for negligence (careless conduct, or other wrongful or “tortious” conduct) against a federal agency or employee, you must first determine whether you can sue the federal government under the FTCA.
Although the limitations and exceptions are too numerous to review here, here are some general guidelines regarding the limitations on FTCA claims:
• Only federal employees can be sued under the FTCA, not independent contractors hired by the federal government (unless they are treated like employees).
• The negligent or wrongful conduct must have been done within the scope of the defendant’s employment.
• In general, only claims of negligence — as opposed to intentional misconduct — are allowed (though some claims for intentional misconduct can be brought against certain federal law enforcement officers).
• The claim must be based on — and permitted by — the law of the state in which the misconduct occurred.
Despite these and numerous other limitations on FTCA lawsuits, the federal government still pays out millions of dollars each year to compensate FTCA claims. Maybe it will get someone’s attention. And I’ll bet I can find at least one hundred lawyers and a number of organizations that would like to get a piece of Uncle Sugar. (hat tip FReeper redwood71)
There’s no doubt that the meeting was planned in advance because the reporter was tipped off as to its time and place. Moreover, an FBI agent was apparently dispatched from their Phoenix office to warn potential onlookers to not use cameras and cell phones during the meeting. It was all arranged.
“They said they wouldn’t do it again.”
Did she really say that? OMG LOL!
Who says an old dog can’t learn new tricks....she has learned a new line from Obama......”I heard about it from the news.”
“Obviously no one wants to see any untoward conclusions drawn,” Clinton added. “They said they wouldn’t do it again.”
The low regard this grifter holds for the average citizen
is just beyond belief.
Bill wanted to know when Loretta would be serving coffee.
The children of this country will learn a civics lesson when Clinton is given a pass.
And the country will continue to deteriorate.
Trump will target Hillary, but should also put it into context of the corruption that appears permanent at Justice and IRS.
NO JUSTICE! NO PEACE!
She again packs a huge number of lies into a few short sentences.
I haven’t watched the interview - did Chuck Todd eagerly lap them up rather than calling her out on those lies?
Just a review. No threat to Women’s healthcare.
and when is housekeeping coming by to clean the room
Of course it was planned. Bill was vetting Ms. Lynch for Hillary’s VP, think about it.
[”I am not going to comment on the process,” she told Chuck Todd, just hours after she was interviewed by the FBI.
“I have no knowledge of any timeline,” she added. “This is entirely up to the department.”
Clinton reiterated that she never sent or received material marked classified on her private server.]
EARLY ONSET OF DEMENTIA.
Chuck Todd is such a smarmy POS.
I think of a child molester every time I see that stupid hair cut and mangy beard....Creepy
Who are you going to believe? Me or your lyin eyes?
“Live with the lie...”
“Clinton reiterated that she never sent or received material marked classified on her private server.”
And “ I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.....”
The word trick here is “sexual relations”. He just sodomized her with a cigar and let her give him Lewinskys, but not (supposedly) “sexual relations” (intercourse).
In Hillary’s case, she always says “ “Most importantly I never sent classified material on my email and I never received any that was marked classified,””
The word trick here is “classified”. “classified” is not a classification. It is a general term pertaining to all types of data that is to be protected from everyone except those having the proper clearance and a “NEED TO KNOW”.
Nothing is “marked” “classified”. They would be “marked” “TOP SECRET” (in orange), “SECRET” (in red), or “CONFIDENTIAL” (in blue), for example.
Top and bottom of every page. The cover would be marked with the highest classification used in the document. If one word was classified TOP SECRET, the the entire page would be marked TOP SECRET and the cover would have to be marked TOP SECRET even if all the rest of the data was only CONFIDENTIAL.
Hillary’s word games will not protect her from her mishandling classified materials, just as Bill’s didn’t protect him from mishandling Ms Lewinsky.
http://electrospaces.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-us-classification-system.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.