Posted on 06/28/2016 7:04:33 AM PDT by detective
Trump frightens these basterds:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM
F'em. They should be hanged. After a fair trial, of course.
George Will, Brent Scowcroft, Hank Paulson, Paul Ryan all that includes Bill Kristol, Robert Kagan, Mitch McConnell
fear Donald Trump.
They know that their influence/paychecks and their sinecure pay checks are in danger when Trump becomes president.
• sinecure •
Printable Version
Pronunciation: si-nê-kyur
Part of Speech: Noun
Meaning: 1. Any position with compensation but few or no duties or responsibilities: a featherbed position. 2. An ecclesiastical benefice with no attached spiritual duties in a parish.
Notes: Sinecures are one of those frustrating manifestations of our society that lead to both anger and humor. It has a rather pompous synonym, sinecureship, as one might hold a high sinecureship in government. Then there is the adjective sinecured, as to marry someone sinecured for life, not to mention sinecurism, the practice of allowing or holding sinecures.
In Play: Sinecures are popular positions for incompetent relatives: “Seamus Allgood is working out well in the sinecure his uncle gave him in his company.” Doesn’t it seem that every job but yours is a sinecure? “Lucille Ondaflor was too young to retire, so they transmoted her to a sinecure in mailroom management.”
Word History: Today’s word comes from a Medieval Latin phrase, beneficium sine cura “an endowed Church office without the care (of souls), as opposed to a curate, who is a pastor with a flock of souls. The phrase underlying today’s word is Latin sine “without” and cura “care, concern”. English derives cure and curator from the same root via various routes—but not curare.
This word is a corruption of wurari, a word from Macusi, a Carib dialect spoken by the Indians of Guiana. (Today’s Good Word was a suggestion of Aaron Corday, a contributor in our Alpha Agora, who obviously cares a great deal about words.)
http://www.alphadictionary.com/goodword/word/sinecure
Hank Paulson’s real claim to fame, is that he openly advocated the patently insane 30 to 1 leveraging of bank assets. He is hardly someone we want with his hand on the Treasury Department, again. It speaks well for Donald Trump that Paulson is not on board. On the other hand, it shows that Paulson really was the jerk, he seemed, a few years before he posed as a savior in dealing with a bank crisis that he was in part responsible for.
The Hypocrites Have Left the Building (NeverTrump journalists make their GOP exit, and take their credibility with them)
The Hypocrites Have Left the Building
Lifezette ^ | 6/28/2016 | Edmund Kozak
Posted on 6/28/2016, 9:09:02 AM by orchestra
The Hypocrites Have Left the Building (NeverTrump journalists make their GOP exit, and take their credibility with them)
A number of conservatives who spent the last few decades telling Americans they should support the Republican Party — despite it fielding unconservative candidates — have suddenly decided that ideological purity matters.
For instance, columnist George Will on Friday announced his departure from the Republican Party — during an appearance at a Federalist Society luncheon no less. Will joins a number of self-proclaimed conservatives who have abandoned the GOP ship since it became clear that Trump would likely be the party’s nominee.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifezette.com ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3444415/posts
For decades these bozos have been telling us to grit our teeth and vote for the clown they’ve nominated. Now, when the shoes are on the other foot, suddenly it’s all about “principle” over party.
The ‘republican’ party needs to just be dissolved.
Thats why the GOP elites are earning the name Judas/Quisling the first betrayed for 30 pieces of silver the other for flattering statements & a fancy title,that is the best/most accurate description of the RNC & Congressional Republicans that I have seen in a long time.
They disgust me.
I’ve been watching this video for the past 38 minutes and if it is true - it is damning to the very core of our right wing. Was this your intention? Should I become a liberal on the basis of the video?
What proof can you supply that the accusations are true?
Not that there is anything in this world that could convince me to embrace the policies of the left!
Okay, continuing to watch it . . . is this what created the GOPe? That seems to make sense. It is not an attack on the Constitutionalists . . . but rather the globalists that are basically your democrat-lites
Would that be a fair analysis?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.