Posted on 06/26/2016 6:03:32 PM PDT by Helicondelta
Paul Manafort absolutely nails this interview with left-wing pearl clutcher Chuck Todd.
Transcript Via NBC News:
CHUCK TODD:
Let me start with Brexit. What I want to know is whether Donald Trump believes what happened in the U.K. is in the best interest of the United States. He said it was good for the U.K., and I understand that. But does he believe what happened is in the best interest to the United States?
PAUL MANAFORT:
Well, you have to understand what happened there. What happened with Brexit was people taking back control. I mean, they get the faceless bureaucrats in Brussels and Strasbourg who have ruled and told the Brits how to live and making promises for them that their lives would get better and talking about a future based on globalism versus family and individual and local community.
That’s what Brexit was all about. And the reality is, those are the same issues that cause the angst in America today. And this election, in 2016, where Donald Trump is the only change agent, is set up perfectly on those same themes, because Hillary Clinton is the epitome of the establishment. She’s been in power for 25 years.
And the issues, the promises that globalism is the solution, the promise that government’s going to make your life better if you just give up your freedoms, the promises that we know better than you on how to make your lives better, have been rejected. That’s what Donald Trump has identified, that’s what Brexit identified, and that’s what’s going to be the basis for the election in 2016.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
I listened to this interview today on Conservative Tree House and Chuck Todd is an idiotic, gutter scraping, uneducated, pond scum sucking, cockroach eating, snake licking scum bag...
Hillary deserves every one of the gutter trolls, they act just like her!!!
BOOM!
Hillary is a Marxist-selfist
And WELL PAID for dispensing all of those virtues from the deep pockets of the DNC.
FWIW, the three three richest burbs in the USA are nearby DC. Come ON! Todd has bills to pay.
/s
Here’s the deal. It’s up to you Trumpsters to win it. I live in Texas and was a Cruzer, granted I realize his far right would never won a National election, but I love him as my Senator.
I spent 5 hours yesterday trying to convince my mother, 2 sisters and brother to vote for Trump vs not voting.
I told them, yo, I don’t like Trump either but the Supreme Court picks are what this election is really about. They live in Pennsylvania (and that’s super important) and I kept saying but you have to vote.
My family is staunchly Catholic, I said I’m not sure if you heard of the bakery in Oregon or the flower shop that refused to do homo weddings and were fined and bankrupted, BUT as a Catholic this government is about to force your church and institution to perform gay marriages which is against our beliefs.
I tell them again and again if you wish the Supreme Court to go that way, then the church can either go against our principles or don’t perform marriages at all.
The way that I understand Trump is that he wants the USA to make equitable trade deals with other countries, basically win / win trade deals for all countries who deal with USA.
And these deals will be based on powers which the states have delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, evidenced by the Constitution’s Commerce Clause (1.8.3).
The way that I presently understand globalism is that evil international bankers are pushing for a one world government which Clinton arguably supports.
The major constitutional problem with the US surrendering its sovereignty to corrupt, international bankers is this. Regardless that the unconstitutionally big federal government now regulates INTRAstate banking, the writings of Thomas Jefferson show that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had actually decided against giving the feds the specific power to regulate intrastate banking.
“A proposition was made to them to authorize Congress to open canals, and an amendatory one to empower them to incorporate. But the whole was rejected, and one of the reasons for rejection urged in debate was, that then they would have a power to erect a bank, which would render the great cities, where there were prejudices and jealousies on the subject, adverse to the reception of the Constitution [emphasis added].” —Jefferson’s Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank : 1791.
So please point my pinhead in the right direction.
There is no more of an establishment candidate than Hillary Clinton. She is owned, lock, stock, and barrel by Globalists, neo-con artists, and Wall Street. Trump HAS got to expose her at every single turn, in every single interview, every single speech, and he has to get a host of surrogates out there on every show repeating that like a mantra. Clinton has an army of surrogates on every network and cable show fighting her battle for her, as well as 0bama.
Every other candidate that Trump schlonged was a globalist. Cruz. Kaisch. Et al.
Add losers Ryan. McCain. McConnell et al. We have got to dump the D C eastablishment.
The American people need to realize that “GLOBALIZATION” means that the wages, living standards, freedoms, and 1st and 2nd Amendment rights that we now experience will be lowered drastically if not obliterated by becoming a One World piece of the Politicians pie...
Globalizing would mean lowering us...Not raising the rest of the world...
btt
Globalism is the incremental step toward One World Government...
“Will somebody please define what a globalism is? “
Others may have answered this question for you, but I would like to weigh in with my own take on the Globalism concept.
I know that when I have questions like this for FR I get a lot of “well DUH” types of answers and nothing is really brass tacks. So here goes.
I’m not a movie buff, but I find it’s easy to compare and contrast reality with a movie. If you recall the movie “The Fifth Element”, there was a “President” of the whole globe. This guy ran the entire planet and represented the democratic will of all human beings and residents of the earth. The Military in this movie answered to him at the top. There were no more wars because there was only one military (This wasn’t stated in the movie, but it’s assumed. If there is only one country then there is only one army). A president like this would be able to rally an entire species behind a single effort. Like the Mangalores. They were an alien race with touchy relationships with Earth. Sometimes attackers, sometimes uneasy, un-liked residents.
People look at this sort of scenario as a dream scenario. This is where a human being is allowed to go anywhere on the surface of the planet, and live in any region they wanted to. They would all be residents of a single community. There would be no cultural insults, no racism and no intra-personal conflicts. Just everyone with the same opportunities, background and level playing field.
On paper this reads like a utopia.
Now lets return to reality. Think of the Global Earth Government as “The UN”. The UN wants to rule the whole planet. They were established under the pretense that everyone is equal and together we could eliminate all of the individual armies and unify under a grand army. All of our currency would be the same and we would be able to travel to other (former) countries without showing papers, and freely as we wished.
This sounds sorta like the Euro Zone, doesn’t it ? Under the Euro borders were blurred out and people could travel around the beautiful countryside with a single currency, single idea of cultural behavior and a unified law.
To play devil’s advocate I’m going to assume that the intent of Globalization is benevolent. I’m also going to acknowledge that the job is no where near done.
What we have are not nations of people and leaders coming together to make people more free and more capable. It is not actually producing more opportunity or success. You can’t pass a law that makes everyone more successful. You can only pass laws that limit people. And all of these countries with their hundreds of laws and regulations came together to create one super country with thousands of laws. And if you didn’t agree with the law, you would have to gain popular movement (Through votes) to get your voice heard... only now with 10 times as many people needed to make the democratic change.
Being an individual with brilliant ideas now makes you so powerless and unable to enact change that you are on the same level as a slave.
Regardless of who is in power, there is no escaping this. Without the compartmentalization of people and their culture, your person and your culture will be forever terminated and lost.
I have heard a lot of people, on both sides of the table talking about how Trump isn’t “one of the globalists” and that he instead is “his own version of globalist”. I used to think the same thing too. I used to think that Trump will be a globalist, but he’ll make sure that his kids and grandkids are living in the leadership country. And that ... I don’t think that’s the point here.
It would certainly create a lucrative legacy for the Trump family - which is Donald’s goal (Read Art of the Deal. IT’s not stated in that book, but it will help you to understand that Trump will improve America because of what he has here... his family.) but there is something deeper and more long-lasting in the position of leadership through example instead of leadership through title.
Another movie to think about: Terminator 4. John Connor isn’t the head of the resistance. He’s just a general of sorts. But more people follow him than follow the leadership because of his character - not his title.
America can be and should be that nation once again. Trump isn’t looking to annex the world, he is looking to build a medium sized nation up to a level where the world listens to us and respects us. That is FAR more profitable for the people, and Trump’s grandkids.
OMG, is that real or shopped?
Let’s go!
Trump All the Way!
That’s All I have to Say!
That’s the real deal. Her stomach is going one way and her azz is going the other way. See how she makes sure to pinch her coat tightly to make sure it doesn’t open....(very sneaky, but to no avail; that can’t hide all the pork)
What is the truest definition of Globalization?
Answer: Princess Diana’s death.
An English Princess with an Egyptian boyfriend crashes in a French tunnel, riding in a German car with a Dutch engine, driven by a Belgian who was drunk on Scottish whisky, followed closely by Italian Paparazzi, on Japanese motorcycles, treated by an American doctor, using Brazilian medicines.
This is sent to you by a Canadian, using American Bill Gates’ technology, and you’re probably reading this on your computer, that uses Taiwanese chips, and a Korean monitor, assembled by Bangladeshi workers in a Singapore plant, transported by Indian truck drivers, hijacked by Indonesians, unloaded by Sicilian longshoremen, and trucked to you by Mexicans who are in the US illegally because the current president, born in Kenya and educated as a muslim in Indonesia refuses to enforce US law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.