WILL LYNCH FOLLOW THE RULE OF LAW (Clinton email case)?

FOX News Sunday ^ | 6/20/2016 | self

[SERKIT]

WALLACE: I want to talk about one other subject with you. President Obama recently endorsed Hillary Clinton for president. Take a look.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: "I’m with her. I am fired up, and I cannot wait to get out there and campaign for Hillary."
(END VIDEO CLIP)
WALLACE: Now, you're a political appointee of the president. Does that create a conflict of interest for you? Does that make it harder for you to handle the criminal investigation into Clinton when your boss is saying he thinks she should be president?

LYNCH: Well, you know, I don't get involved on whom the president endorses and I don’t have comments, as I said before, on any of the candidates. The investigation into the State Department e-mail matter is going to be handled like any other matter. We’ve got career agents and lawyers looking at that. They will follow the facts and follow the evidence wherever it leads and come to a conclusion.

[SERKIT]

WALLACE: So, does this create a conflict of interest for you?

LYNCH: No, this is not a conflict for me and for the department or for anyone. We will continue to do all of our work in the same language we always have, with the interest of the American people first and foremost.

WALLACE: Now, the same day that Clinton was endorsed by the president, you met with the president at the White House. Did you in any way, shape or form discuss the Clinton case with the president?

LYNCH: We’ve never discussed the Clinton case. I have never spoken about it with the president or really with anyone at the White House. That's not the kind of relationship that I have with people there and it would be inappropriate to do so.

WALLACE: Attorney General Lynch, thank you. Thanks for your time today.

(Bold emphasis added above.)
SERKIT COMMENTS:
Like the Obama regime, and especially the Clintons method of messaging, parsing is required to get through the obfuscation. Based on Lynch's comments, she is more interesting in "language" than the law, and places heavy emphasis in the "interest of the American people first and foremost" - however the Regime interprets that phrase.

The bottom line here is that Loretta Lynch needs to be asked a fairly simple question:
If the FBI investigators bring a criminal case against Mrs Clinton to the DoJ, citing that Mrs Clinton broke one or more laws related to her failure to "take care" of public documents or avoidance of national security breaches, which she was sworn to do, admitted she failed to do, and has publicly apologized for, will the DoJ follow the law, or be influenced by the "interest of the American people first and foremost", meaning, the President's endorsement of Mrs Clinton trumps the rule of law and the case will be quashed? (We can't have Trump!)

Link of Transcript

[null and void]

She will absolutely follow the law...

...any time following the law suits the Agenda.

[mkjessup]

Will Lynch follow the law?

Can a fish ride a bicycle?

[txrefugee]

No. Not unless Obama tells her to. Her mouth moves when he pulls the strings.

[cincinnati65]

Sure she will.........as she interprets it......

[Electric Graffiti]

Yes.

sharia law

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

"...We will continue to do all of our work in the same language we always have, with the interest of the American people first and foremost...."

The interest of the American people is subjective. The rule of law is not. Not the same thing, Loretta.

[Enchante]

"We will continue to do all of our work in the same language we always have, with the interest of the American people first and foremost."

This is a dangerous and revealing mis-statement. Their job is to FOLLOW AND ENFORCE THE LAW, period.

Of course it is in the ultimate "interest" (properly understood) of the American people that the laws be enforced, but when liberals talk about "interest of the American people" instead of the LAW they are busy substituting their "creative" interpretations of what our elites think is better for us. Such "interest" is liberal code for "WE know what is best for you peasants."

It will be easy for Lynch and here colleagues to decide that their view of "the interest of the American people" requires that Shrillary not be indicted, no matter what the evidence and law may say.

[freedomlover]

Uh, No.

[jiggyboy]

“the interest of the American people first and foremost” == no obstacles to Hillary being elected

[simpson96]

"Will Lynch follow the rule of law?"

Might as well ask - Will Hillary drop 50 pounds of ugly fat by Thursday?

[SGCOS]

the similarity between this Lynch being on all the talk shows denying any involvement with the White House, compared with Susan Rice on all the talk shows saying 'it was a video'...

Remarkably similar..

[lakecumberlandvet]

loretta lynch is a smooth-talking liar. But, foremost, a liar.

[sappy]

Look how quickly decisions were made by here w/respect to what and what won’t be provided in the transcript of the ISIS killer in Orlando. The Justice Dept can move very quickly when it suits THIS Admins needs.

[SERKIT]

Like 75 years to review 4 years’ worth of Hillary emails? Yeah...Ok.

[Da Bilge Troll]

Duh!

[sappy]

Trump would do well to point this ineptness out, specifically. Hello someone hacked Sarah Palins yahhoo acount and the MSM creamed their shorts digging through it. Chances of Putin/China blackmail? HIGH

[yoe]

Well now that Wallace has cleared the air about the honesty of AG Lynch, we can all see justice done to a crooked politician.....

What we actually can see is how corrupt our government really is....and...what an apt lair Loretta Lynch is. Ms. Lynch and Obama will place Hillary...

[mykroar]

WILL LYNCH FOLLOW THE RULE OF LAW (Clinton email case)?

I'll take rhetorical questions for $200, Alex.

[Don Corleone]

No. Not unless Obama tells her to. Her mouth moves when he pulls the strings.

And his moves when Jarrett or Soros pull the strings. Its all a big Muslim cluster f...!