Posted on 06/14/2016 12:46:48 PM PDT by usafa92
Not historic because she didn’t earn it.
The Democrats OWED her bigtime for not walking away and tanking her husband’s Presidency when Drudge broke the Monica story nearly twenty years ago.
This nomination was handed to her because her party had no choice.
I see it as a mistake, especially since she should be in jail by now.
No it isn't, Stephanie. 60% of women disagree with you.
The GOP is trying to hand Hillary the win...traitors all of them.
1) Registered, not likely
2) MOE of 2
3) Don’t know D/R split, so a
at worst a tie
This election is going to be hand to hand combat. Trump is up against the DNC, MSM and unfortunately the GOP as well.
“1) Registered, not likely
2) MOE of 2
3) Dont know D/R split, so a
at worst a tie”
4) Poll taken prior to Sundays Islamic attack.
It would be historic for sure! HISTORIC MISTAKE!
Paul Ryan is more of a traior to America than Obama
Re: Paul Ryan treachery, I’m afraid you’re right.
The fact that The Beast’s campaign style is histrionic doesn’t make her nomination historic.
An act of historic stupidity, perhaps.
She has already been a co president from 1992 to 2000 , and was married to the first black president, so she is not so historic.
I am embarrased that this is what women have turned into.
The GOP is like the Democrats - they are all well purchased by Saudi and other Islamic money. Wealthy beyond their wildest dreams by selling out to Islam. If they want that gravy train of Islamic dollars to keep heading into their bank accounts, they will have to unite to try and beat Trump. Republicans are as bad as the Democrats - they’ve sold out to Islam the same way. That’s why they take the same position on terrorist attacks in America...that you can’t blame Islam.
Only a third (33 percent) of men said Clintons achievement was historic, while 42 percent of women shared the view.
Wow. Almost six in ten women see nothing historic or noteworthy about Hillary being the first woman pres. nominee of a major party.
It’s puzzling in a way. Love her or hate her, Hillary has made history as a woman nominee for president.
Interesting that so few people really care about that.
Could it be because she is Hillary Clinton, she’s only there because of her husband, and the stench emanating from the Clintons outweighs whatever “historic achievement” liberals want to talk about with HIllary????
Most voters are clueless. One of the biggest crime families in history has a good chance to take control of the most powerful country in history. I’d call that historic.
The whole premise of the question is intended to push the weak-minded in Hillary’s direction.
“Historic? Like, wow! I never thought of it like that!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.