Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Slim majority say Trump's comments about judge's Mexican heritage were "racist"
YouGov ^ | June 8, 2016 | Peter Moore

Posted on 06/09/2016 6:12:35 AM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: LibFreeUSA

Paul Ryan wants the gravy train to keep running... big donations from the money men in the US...


41 posted on 06/09/2016 8:30:51 AM PDT by GOPJ ("DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing Vanloads of Illegal Aliens Away from Border"-where's ABC, CBS, CNN???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

Was Trump wrong in saying “Mexican”? I don’t think so. I’m glad he said “Mexican”. This stuff has gone on for far too long and now things need to be addressed if they still can be. Damn foreign invasion colonizing the USA based on lies and with a superiority complex that is very much like a Nazi party for Mexicans complete with many adherents ion positions of authority. Way past time for push back. To be nice and tolerant of this evil is too passively encourage genocide. Is it racist to defend yourself? Whites people, particularly Western White Christians from second class citizenship to the gas chamber. Everything is going to be racist because Whites are being singled out as a race and then when they defend themselves they are attacked. This has been allowed to go on far too long and we are truly in a lead up to something like the 1930’s. Posterity will judge us harshly for out moral weakness for sure.


42 posted on 06/09/2016 8:36:29 AM PDT by Sheapdog (Chew the meat, spit out the bones - FUBO - Come and get me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

You are correct. Trump stumbled or the only words being reported are a stumble.. The media will use it relentlessly unless Trump says over and over and over “judge Curiel is biased against me because ....” the truth. He could add that he should have been more detailed in his original statement.


43 posted on 06/09/2016 8:37:20 AM PDT by amihow (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sheapdog

I don’t disagree. Perhaps instead of just saying “Mexican” he could be a little faster on his feet in interviews to get in all the other dirt about this judge - factually, take the bluster out, firm, commanding... I know we’re all tired of the media, but Trump may be losing support solely on presentation that many don’t appreciate (even though many of us do).


44 posted on 06/09/2016 8:55:00 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

I agree he could do without the repetitive bluster and get some more facts in. He is no Larry MacDonald.

Have you seen this video with MacDonald and Pat Buchanan on Crossfire discussing the NWO from 1983?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BPhYEFGaGM


45 posted on 06/09/2016 9:06:05 AM PDT by Sheapdog (Chew the meat, spit out the bones - FUBO - Come and get me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson