Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford creates "side-by-side" 1965/2015 Mustang display (Photos in the link)
Fox News.com ^ | May 6, 2016 | Andrew Ganz

Posted on 05/06/2016 2:54:16 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: katana

That is why I won’t touch GM or Chrysler...handouts.
Love my Navigator since the price of gas plummeted.
My Lexus is a good ride but not as good as my former BMW 745.
Stick with Ford. A dear friend of mine just bought a Mustang 5.0 convertible...she loves it.


21 posted on 05/06/2016 4:41:52 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The 65 Stang was a real car. The 2016 is Mustang-lite.


22 posted on 05/06/2016 4:45:37 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

“i bought you a brand-new Mustang, a 1965.”


23 posted on 05/06/2016 4:47:40 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The one on the right, made in America, the one on the left made in Mexico, or soon will be?

I’m gonna go with a foreign car for my next one. I mean, why not? What difference does it make?


24 posted on 05/06/2016 4:53:38 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
The red-side handles a lot better.

As well it should. However, stick a good 3-link coil-over rear suspension in the '65, do the Shelby mod to the front upper control arms along with some stiffer springs and a decent-sized wheel/tire combo... surprisingly good. Considerably less mass to toss around, too.

25 posted on 05/06/2016 4:56:28 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

..........me too...........myself and a buddy skipped school one afternoon and drove out on North Lamar to the only Ford Dealership in town (now a dozen?)JUST to see the little mustang on the show room floor. This was 1964 or 65.

My recollection was that the sticker was $1,700.00 dollars.

I’ll never forget it but have never owned one.


26 posted on 05/06/2016 5:14:08 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Good.

I would hate to think that someone sawed a perfectly good ‘65 Mustang in half just for a display.


27 posted on 05/06/2016 5:19:13 PM PDT by Peter W. Kessler ("NUTS!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler

Yeah the Chinese are stamping out new 65 Mustangs every day.


28 posted on 05/06/2016 5:25:17 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
The red-side handles a lot better.

Let's do the comparo with the same tires on both....

29 posted on 05/06/2016 5:27:14 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

To me the new Mustang borrows more from a ‘69 or ‘70 model than a ‘65. And I will add that I think the new one looks pretty dang good. I’m seeing them all over the place. My impression is that Ford has a hit on their hands. I wonder what the sales numbers look like.


30 posted on 05/06/2016 5:33:40 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think of the 1966, and the 1968 ‘Fastback’ Mustang, and I still drool.
Nowadays? They look nice, but cost more than my first house, so no thanks.
I was not an ‘American GM’ convert, but I did own two Euro GM models. The Opel Manta and GT. There was not a thing to make better, in my mind, as to how the GT was manufactured, with aftermarket parts. However, that Manta was a different story. It was quite the BMW 2002Tii chaser, with the available swapout parts, in that time. I DID, for a while, own a 1975 Chevy Monza that was supposed to have the rotary engine, but found itself fitted with a 265 cid V*, with a very stiff 4-speed tranny. Now that design, did get the works and did have a few owners run them in Camel GT races on the SCCA tracks.

Now, for the the ‘otoh’, i also did own, for a while, a datsun 1600 Roadster, and THAT was the FUNNEST car I had ever owned. That design, also, was an SCCA racer.


31 posted on 05/06/2016 5:35:18 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

I remember going to Creel Ford Co. in my hometown to see the first one. It was the basic model, six cylinder with 3 speed manual but still looked nice.

My memory may be bad too but it seems like it was $2400.00.


32 posted on 05/06/2016 5:36:51 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Very good memory!

http://www.hemmings.com/magazine/hmn/2005/02/1964-1-2-1966-Mustang/1281184.html


33 posted on 05/06/2016 5:38:48 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

I bought a Honda, made in Ohio, by non-union Americans.


34 posted on 05/06/2016 5:39:29 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

LOL.............must have been loaded!!!

Remember too that some time around that time they started putting little air conditioning units under the dash in the center. That said, my little 56 Chevy had factory air. I don’t think it ever worked.


35 posted on 05/06/2016 5:44:25 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

$1700? Wow. I bought a 1964 Chevelle Malibu SS in November 1963 off the showroom floor, the first year of Chevelle’s existence. Sticker price $3290. It’s hard to believe a Mustang would cost that much less.


36 posted on 05/06/2016 5:50:42 PM PDT by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

It was basically a falcon with different sheet metal. I think the engines, transmission etc. were all the same as the falcon.


37 posted on 05/06/2016 5:53:33 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

The base Mustang was essentially a Falcon with better styling, straight six engine, three speed manual. I can believe the base model was $1,700 but I doubt very many went out the door for that price.


38 posted on 05/06/2016 5:54:23 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Dang, just about my favorite car ever! All the sixties SS’s I just loved. I had the 64 impala SS. If yours was all tricked out with the big engine and all the other extras that could explain the difference and, hey, I could be wrong. It was 52 years ago! I have a hard time remembering what I had for lunch!

As I recall, that 63 had the option of the 396 ci with twin four barrel carbs??? I also remember that us kids all spent zillions hopping up the 283 ci. It was one awesome engine.


39 posted on 05/06/2016 6:05:10 PM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

Mine had the 283 cubic inch engine with a Power Pack, which was high compression heads and dual exhaust. It was midnight blue, almost black, and I loved that car. It didn’t have it very long before I had the mufflers replaced with Smitties, which sounded really cool.


40 posted on 05/06/2016 6:08:07 PM PDT by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson