Posted on 04/25/2016 1:42:57 PM PDT by OttawaFreeper
On my Facebook news feed, someone shared a "Hostile Politics" meme that featured a photo of a washroom with the caption "Share if you feel safer in a public restroom with a transgender person than with any male Republican politician". I've reported the meme to the FB people under the "offensive or inappropriate" complaint. I'm not holding my breath for any action in my favour, however, I thought that I'd like to document and share here the response I do actually get.
They don’t care.
Post a response meme “Share if you would rather have a degenerate force oral sex on your daughter than share a restroom with a Republican” and watch the sparks fly.
Get off Farcebook. You are subsidizing Zuckerberg and his loser friends.
The open hostility is evident here , too !
I second this notion. If you willingly subsidize the illegal lover Zuckerberg, you are complicit in treason against the United States.
I do not have a problem with you saying something like that. I feel bad that something like that gets turned into something like what Lake Erie was in the 1960s by these so-called promoters of tolerance and diversity. I just enjoy being connected to friends and those I knew in high school and university and sharing photos I’ve taken at my farm and on my hiking and snowshoeing excursions and trips to the U.K..
Hilarious. That would include the owner of FR I guess.
Yeah, I see what you’re trying to do. You’re trying to get conservatives to keep sending money to liberals like Zuckerberg, so that the well of pro-illegal lobbyists never dries up. Nice try, but I think I can speak for the administration here when I say that FR is and always will be an anti-illegal website.
I don’t know which is sadder: the likelihood that you’re being paid 5 cents a post by some GOP-e or Dem group, or the likelihood that you’re spending your time for free promoting illegal immigration (and have been trolling for almost 12 years).
What a drama queen you are. Having a Facebook page has nothing to do with supporting illegal immigration.
-Facebook directly lobbies for illegal immigration, and is able to lobby harder when its profit margin is higher.
-When people use Facebook, its profit margins increase.
-Therefore, using Facebook results in more money being spent on promoting illegal immigration.
Everyone understands this except you. Or you do understand it, but are playing dumb.
Yeah, me and my guess would be approximately 75% of the Freepers who have a Facebook page including the person who owns this site. If you track down what the people who run Twitter and LinkedIn contribute to I’m sure you’ll find something equally objectionable. Not to mention the films you buy tickets for, the music you buy...
While it is admittedly impossible to be a participant in this society without giving a Leftist money somewhere down the line, Facebook has openly declared itself to be hostile towards conservatism and conservatives in general. Being so careless about where our money goes is one reason why the GOP-e is as large as it is.
You remind me of a guy that used to post here and would tell everyone that if they owned a television they were contributing to a Marxist takeover.
No I meant people who were paying for cable. These days a television on its own is useless.
That’s not true at all; this is 2016. I have a buddy who only uses his television to play video games, many people use it as an output device for their computers, many others just use it to watch physical DVDs or Blu-Rays, many others use it for Netflix...
But okay, cable itself is usually a mixed bag. True, conservatives are forced to finance liberal channels (having a channel blocked does not solve this problem), but liberals are also finance conservative channels. The political net gain/loss for conservatives is difficult to calculate, and I would certainly love to see a study about this. Meanwhile, the political loss for conservatives in relation to Facebook is evident, and evidently enormous.
This is tilting at windmills. People who use Facebook don’t pay them anything. The political effect of Facebook relative to the number of users is negligible regardless of what Zuckerberg personally thinks about immigration.
Facebook makes loads off of advertising revenue. Even people who visit the site with ad-blockers are still indirectly contributing to them making money.
(This is because Adblock/Noscript/etc. only blocks client-side languages such as Javascript; these languages are what determine the display of ads. The cost of the ads is determined by the number of hits the site gets; a hit is recorded and tracked via a server side language such as PHP.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.