Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RNC Rules Member: Nominee Doesn’t Need To Win 8 Primaries
The Daily Caller ^ | April 20, 2016 | Kerry Picket

Posted on 04/20/2016 12:50:15 PM PDT by maggief

HOLLYWOOD, Fla. — The Republican National Committee’s eight state convention threshold rule could be interpreted differently than anyone expects this summer in Cleveland.

Donald Trump and Ted Cruz  97% argue that Ohio Gov. John Kasich could never become the nominee, because Kasich cannot win eight primary contests to be eligible.

However, RNC Standing Rules Committee member Randy Evans told The Daily Caller at the Spring RNC Meeting Wednesday that a nominee does not need to “win” eight state primary contests to qualify to be put into contention — only the support of eight delegations at the convention.

“You do not have to win them. Because the rules says you have to demonstrate support of the majority of eight states as opposed to you have to win eight states,” Evans said. “So theoretically you could have a state — and the precedent is that’s what it was designed to do, which is to permit a state you didn’t win to nonetheless support putting your name in nomination.”

Known as Rule 40b, the eight state threshold came about at the GOP Tampa Convention in 2012, when the Romney campaign pushed it as a way to deny then-Rep. Ron Paul any chance of getting the nomination. The previous threshold was five states.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: convention; elections; gope; inyourheadrentfree; presidentdonaldtrump; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 04/20/2016 12:50:15 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maggief

This is getting annoying.


2 posted on 04/20/2016 12:52:08 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("You know who gets hurt? The people who worked hard, lived frugally, and saved their money."- Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

No. He (or she) just can’t be named “DOnald Trump”.

Yes. These clowns grow wearisome.


3 posted on 04/20/2016 12:56:55 PM PDT by ZULU (Trump is the answer. The Establishment is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Is it too much to ask in a news article like this that they provided the exact full text of the rule? Sometimes I suspect the media want to start arguments among readers rather than provide enough information for one to settle the argument.


4 posted on 04/20/2016 12:58:03 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Where’s that “Not this @($%! again” guy?


5 posted on 04/20/2016 12:59:19 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Cruz speaking on Fox Business right now his speaking Style has become straight up creepy


6 posted on 04/20/2016 1:00:52 PM PDT by jneesy (I want my country back and Trump is gonna give it to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maggief

The people that make these rules couldn’t win a debate with my parakeet, and all it says is “Pretty boy.”


7 posted on 04/20/2016 1:01:08 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("You know who gets hurt? The people who worked hard, lived frugally, and saved their money."- Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

They can just as easily modify or eliminate rule 40D, which as currently written, requires a majority (1,237).

They could make it a plurality, or a super-majority, or whatever.


8 posted on 04/20/2016 1:01:09 PM PDT by ChuteTheMall (Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Here it comes.

Trying to redefine what “it” means.

“demonstrate support of the majority of eight states “

No matter how you slice and dice that statement, Kasich, Rubio, Bush, etc...none of them except Trump and Cruz can in any way come close to that threshold.


9 posted on 04/20/2016 1:03:04 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Of course not, you don’t need to win anything. The GOPe leaders can just pull anyone out from a drawer and make him the nominee. Elections are for entertainment purposes only.


10 posted on 04/20/2016 1:04:53 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I don’t think this changes anything really.


11 posted on 04/20/2016 1:05:29 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

The disciples of deception and decline in D.C. have achieved the pinnacle of arrogance. Their masks have been blown off their deceitful faces.


12 posted on 04/20/2016 1:08:01 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

You have to demonstrate support of the majority of eight states
as opposed to you have to win eight states,” Evans said.
-
Do what?


13 posted on 04/20/2016 1:08:26 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz

G O P

Grand Old Pretzel


14 posted on 04/20/2016 1:09:37 PM PDT by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Had a call from a GOP money beggar just now... (get them constantly) so this time I just said “We’re supporting Trump”. He hung up instantly without saying a word.


15 posted on 04/20/2016 1:11:27 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I’ve made this point a couple of times. The rule doesn’t say anything about how many delegates a candidate has won in each state - it is whether a majority of delegates from eight different states are willing to sign a statement of support for the candidate. Theoretically, if enough Trump delegate spots were filled bu Cruz or Kasich supporters in states where Trump won a majority of the delegates, and those delegates refused to sign the statement of support, Trump could wind up not having enough states to be nominated. Now, I don’t see that happening - but the way the rule is written, it would be possible.


16 posted on 04/20/2016 1:13:05 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“All animals are equal . But the pigs are more equal.”


17 posted on 04/20/2016 1:13:49 PM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Hunga Tonga-Hunga.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

New GOP Math

8 - 4 = 8


18 posted on 04/20/2016 1:13:59 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuteTheMall
They can just as easily modify or eliminate rule 40D, which as currently written, requires a majority (1,237).

Since a majority has been required since 1856, don't expect that rule to be changed.

19 posted on 04/20/2016 1:14:22 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I guess they’re changing it so Jeb can win...


20 posted on 04/20/2016 1:16:56 PM PDT by GOPJ (If GOPe rules are rigged to steal votes from citizens it's time to walk away from this party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson