Voter fraud exposed!

YouTube ^ | April 7, 2016 | Roger Skelton

[Sergio]

bkmk

[Freedom56v2]

Scotty, you need to be beamed up. Again total knee-jerk wrong conclusion...

This is what I said:

Yes, some of us long-timers “upper classmen” (2001) on FR actually do research and watch the video or read the article before knee-jerk posting about it...

If you think I meant “upper class,” then you need to go back to school...”Upper classmen” are Juniors and Seniors in high school or college, and I said us long-timers “upper classmen” (2001). “Lower classmen” are Freshman and Sophomores—since you have only been here since 2008, you are a Freshman or Sophomore....Sheesh._

_______________________

Again, since you are rather slow on the uptake, I will repost my last conservation:

Great research? Uhhuh Either another knee-jerk reaction or fraudulent attack on me...I didn’t put the post in...I often print the post to which I am replying...But you didn’t notice that or tried to make it look like I posted all of it...When in actuality, I said:

Wow, thanks for link..I will get on Twitter.

Sorry but Twitter is viable...Cruz uses it, Fox uses it. “Class” or “Upper Class” has nothing to do with “ Upper Classmen ” or National Enquirer. Yup, it is a tabloid, but it has been correct on certain pols’ activities. So what?

Anyway, If you had watched the video you would know it was not hurriedly put together...The only thing hurriedly put together are your responses....I don’t really care...you just look uninformed....Video has nothing to do with Wisconsin or any other 2016 election.

---

Your reply:
You saw that post I referenced and as such you consider Twitter and the National Enquirer as legitimate media. Twitter is hardly a referential source. Of course that doesn’t stop you and the rest of Trumpetteville from jumping onto the first anti-Cruz rumor like a starved maggot on day-old dog sh*t.

Twitter and National Enquirer. You have no credibility, kid. Move along.

---

Sorry, Cruz campaign and Cruz himself tweets, their operatives have dished plenty of dirt on Trump that I have seen posted here—did you complain then? doubt it...There are news stories on Twitter, get with the Twenty-First Century, Scotty.

You state: Twitter is hardly a referential source. Of course that doesn’t stop you and the rest of Trumpetteville from jumping onto the first anti-Cruz rumor like a starved maggot on day-old dog sh*t. This type of personal insult/attack is exactly what Jim Robinson, this conservative guy who started FR, asked people to stop doing.....yet you persist. You must make yourself look not only ignorant, but rude.

As far as “kid,” I have been here twice as long as you, and I suspect posted many more articles than you, so why don’t you learn to get along around here.

I don’t know it this is some type of diversion tactic, but you tried to discredit me, Trump supporters and a video made years ago. You seem to enjoy attacking Trump supporters, fellow FReepers BTW... and turned a valuable video and a simple comment about it into some kind of flame war with Cruz, and insults about maggots and dog sh*t, twitter and national enquirer...Way to go, Scotty!

Frankly, at this point, I could care less if you watch the video...Don’t reply to me. You are a waste of bandwidth and time.

[ScottinVA]

You completely and abjectly failed to grasp these the main fact: YOU could not understand why someone would look with a jaundiced eye at a video used as “proof” when homemade YouTube vids are notoriously dubious, especially in light of that recent video fakery out of Colorado.

Your point re “upperclassman” was referenced in the proper context... My use of the “upperclass” is synonymous in that particular context.

As for Twitter serving as some kind of authoritative source, if you still believe that, after the crap spewed on that medium by the likes of Roger Stone, you have much to learn. But your ability to connect to reality is far too restricted by your emotional attachment to Trump.

So.. muddle on.

[ScottinVA]

*this main fact