Posted on 04/07/2016 6:43:12 AM PDT by Rockitz
>>I’ve moved away from Ted blah blah blah
Uhuh.
What’s the specific work-product you’re alleging Heidi Cruz produced in her duties as a CFR/NAFTA conspirator?
It’s NOT about me. Both Ted and Heidi have defamed themselves on so many fronts. Ted is NOT “the only principles candidate in the race”. He burnt that to the ground all by himself. Ted cannot disparage CFR out one side of his mouth when his wife has done work for them.
I can’t believe anyone can swallow it all. It would have been different had he not pretended to be a bastion of ethical and principled behavior. Bush endorsed him - doesn’t that sink in even a little bit?? Unbelievable. And people keep bonging his kool-aid. Amazing.
At least they didn’t flip to establishment like Cruz did.
>>It’s NOT about me.
But it is. It’s about the character of disingenuous twits like you who think it’s cute to make accusations without being able to PRODUCE EVIDENCE.
YOU are symptomatic of what’s wrong with America.
Some of us remember a quaint Republic where ideas like “Innocent until PROVEN guilty” meant something.
You can’t produce any evidence. FAIL.
Take your click bait and shove it.
You too stupid to be able to articulate, in YOUR OWN WORDS, the work-product you allege Heidi Cruz created as a CFR/NAFTA conspirator?
>>At least they didn’t flip to establishment like Cruz did.
The GOPe may have its deep rooted problems - but at least it’s not advocating for Iran to have nuclear weapons.
Only Paultardian super geniuses are doing that.
Ad hominem. Nice.
“She worked for the architect of NAFTA.”
Think. I remember when Clinton got elected - I thought at least he would kill NAFTA. He didn’t. That’s when I understood what the uniparty was. Now Ted has undeniably thrown his hat in their ring. Sad end for “the most principled candidate in the race”.
>>“She worked for the architect of NAFTA.”
FAIL.
What was her work-product?
You can’t produce anything but vapor. Typical Paultard.
“Typical Paultard.”
LOL! double down on ad hominems. Cute. Why are you so angry and calling names??
If Ted’s the nominee I will vote for him. He has taken himself out of contention as my first choice. That isn’t likely to change because Ted is continuing down the dirty road.
Dubya may have been Establishment - but at least he had the common sense to recognize the self-evident problems with a nuclear empowered Iran.
Only a PaulTard would fail to see the insanity of suggesting that Iran should be allowed to have nuclear weapons.
Thus your own words established your taxonomic membership in that class - and those words are being used against you.
Conversely, you FAILED to articulate similar evidence to substantiate the work product derived from the role you allege Heidi Cruz played in the CFR/NAFTA conspiracy.
Sans evidence, should a jury still convict her based on your “opinion”?
“You you you” and even more ad hominems.
Very shallow.
Deeper than the evidence you’ve provided against Mrs. Cruz, you putz.
Wow the anger, the ad hominems. Brilliant.
What was Mrs. Cruz’s work product?
What kind of a question is that? She did work for CFR. She did work for Bush. She did work for Goldman Sachs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidi_Cruz
Lots of people did work for the CFR.
Lots of people did work for Bush.
Lots of people did work for Godlman Sachs.
That doesn’t mean they did anything wrong.
You got any EVIDENCE she did or you just blowing more bubbles out of your vacuous ash cone?
Wow.
Cruz was supposed to be an outsider!
Why are you so bitter? Why call names?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.