Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Trump Right That Women Who Have Abortions Should Be Punished? (Good John Zmirak article)
The Stream ^ | March 30, 2016 | John Zmirak

Posted on 04/06/2016 4:55:25 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Vic S
But that's not how it ever worked n the USA, even before Re vs Wade.

According to Americans United for Life (a law firm with advances pro-life law, and defends pro-life activists pro bono)

There are "only two cases in which a woman was charged in any State with participating in her own abortion": from Pennsylvania in 1911 and from Texas in 1922.2There is no documented case since 1922 in which a woman has been charged in an abortion in the United States.

Based on this record—spanning 50 states over the century before Roe v. Wade—it is even more certain that the political claim that any woman might be questioned or prosecuted for a spontaneous miscarriage has no record in history and will certainly not be the policy of any state in the future.

How was abortion law enforced?

Going back as far as English and colonial law, the criminal law classified those involved in crimes as principals and accomplices. A principal is "the person whose acts directly brought about the criminal result." An accomplice aids or abets the crime.

States did not treat women who had the abortion as either principals or accomplices. As the Oregon Supreme Court held as late as 1968, the abortionist commits the act, and the woman aborted is the object of that act. "A reading of the statute indicates that the acts prohibited are those which are performed upon the mother rather than any action taken by her. She is the object of the acts prohibited rather than the actor."

As one legal scholar in the 1980s who studied this issue concluded after surveying the 50 states, women "were never charged with murder, only seldom were named co-conspirators, and still more rarely were regarded as accomplices."

While some women were prosecuted for their abortions under the English common law, by the 1870s or 1880s, most American states came to recognize that the better policy was to not prosecute women. That was the position of New York by 1885.

With the exception of [four] state cases, the vast majority of the states with reported cases that discussed this issue determined that states could not prosecute women under any theory of criminal liability.

States relied on various techniques of statutory interpretation, along with the generally held belief that women were victims of their abortions, to support their decisions to refrain from prosecuting women.

As the appeals court in the District of Columbia wrote in 1901, "[b]y its terms, [D.C. Code Ann. § 809 (1901)] applies to the person or persons committing the act which produces the miscarriage, and not to the person upon whom it is committed, notwithstanding it may be done with her knowledge and consent. Not being liable to indictment thereunder, she is not an accomplice in the legal sense."


41 posted on 04/06/2016 5:36:15 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Mother kills her own son or daughter, before they are even born. Should she be punished? Hell Yes.
The father too if he helped in the abortion.

Otherwise we say that 1000 dead American Children killed every single day of the year is not a problem.


42 posted on 04/06/2016 5:37:47 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Trump was 100 percent right, he should not have walked back his comments. Planned Parenthood provides a service, a disgusting service but a service at that, and that is abortion. A woman doesn’t have a gun being put to her head, she goes in knowing they will kill her baby, she makes that choice..she is committing murder plain and simple. Look at these women who walk around wearing “I am proud of my abortion” T-shirts, are we supposed to feel sorry for those loons, they are BUTCHERS I feel zero sympathy for them


43 posted on 04/06/2016 5:39:07 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Is that not what this site has become during this primary?
Essentially two sides who won’t budge, sniping each other.

I think it’s because they really are similar in what they say they support but different significantly in history and delivery.


44 posted on 04/06/2016 5:39:11 PM PDT by Outlaw76 (Conservative, Showman, Rino. Make your choice wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw76

You’re stupid if you think Trump considers this a major issue facing America. He said it, he will uphold the laws. Congress wants to outlaw it then he’ll enforce that law.

He backtracked it the way any person would spin something they said that was being misinterpreted.

Let’s face it, abortion laws will not change whether Cruz or Trump is President.


45 posted on 04/06/2016 5:39:47 PM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Yes. And?


46 posted on 04/06/2016 5:41:22 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

Well I am a trump supporter, but only slightly now. Before his retreat on abortion, I was 100 percent.

You can’t make America Great Again, without the regaining the same values that make America Great Again.

When we were great Abortion was not legal. After 1973 it started downhill quick.


47 posted on 04/06/2016 5:41:30 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

To many it is very simple

1. You cannot ban abortions any more than you can ban murder. BTW, they are one and the same so exceptions cannot be present other than the imminent death of the mother.

2. the only thing you can do is to make both illegal

3. if abortion is illegal, someone must be guilty and there must be a penalty

4. Is doctor or mother or both guilty? If abortion is illegal, obviously the doctor is guilty. I assume the women is too if she consented to abortion.


48 posted on 04/06/2016 5:42:44 PM PDT by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

There are DEGREES to every crime. You can have 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th degree felonies, and also degrees of misdemeanor.

Depending on the circumstance, prosecutor decides which to charge and jury decides guilt. Judge imposes sentence.

So, to say abortion=jail is a trick in that it implies the same punishment is meted out for any abortion, without regard to circumstance. Another way to think of that is that you deciding a case without allowing the jury to determine fact, which is their role.

Given the following examples as facts, how about this as punishment:

1) As head is coming out, Dr. says, “It’s a blonde.” Mother says “I won’t take that, kill it.”

In this case, I vote First Degree Felony, 20 to life. Maybe even death penalty. Goes for both mother and doc.

2) Teenager believes her lib parents who are ex-employees of planned parenthood (now out of business since abortion is illegal) who have convinced her that her life is in danger as a result of the pregnancy, even though it isn’t. Pregnancy terminated at 2 wks.

Daughter gets 4th degree Misdemeanor. Fined $100.00.

I’m not going to attempt to come up w/6 other examples, but I hope you see what I mean here.

You first move to get abortion illegal - the legislatures sort out the details of degree.

Not ALL would go to jail. Some, after trial, might even be found not guilty.

First degree felony, sentence 20-life:


49 posted on 04/06/2016 5:43:28 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ghosthost

That’s right. Illegals are here to take the jobs that those America murdered babies would have taken.


50 posted on 04/06/2016 5:43:43 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

Thank you for displaying your approach to defending a really bad move.


51 posted on 04/06/2016 5:44:11 PM PDT by Outlaw76 (Conservative, Showman, Rino. Make your choice wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Trump supports abortion and thinks planned parenthood is wonderful.


52 posted on 04/06/2016 5:48:13 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

So Trump retreated ....he finally blinked and did not double down.....too bad it was on ABORTION....SOMETHING THAT KILLS 1000 AMERICANS EVERY DAY.

Of course with all his women in the past, the chances one or more of them had an abortion a very good ....which of course would have been very good for a democratic TV ad this fall.


53 posted on 04/06/2016 5:50:50 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

That’s a lie, but I don’t mind you outing yourself that way.


54 posted on 04/06/2016 6:02:48 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

So he hasn’t said those things?


55 posted on 04/06/2016 6:13:59 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Trump has said he will defund the abortion end of Planned Parenthood.

I would think that would make you happy.

Trump did try to be gracious in that in some places Planned Parenthood does provide some services not available elsewhere.

As much as I detest the Eugenics end of the business, in some rural communities were actually women’s service are provided, it’s a plus for those women. I want women to have access to medical services. It’s the abortions I have a problem with.

There was an article on one rural community that was rather isolated from services. It was actually providing some decent services. Rather than shut down the only health care the women near there had, I wouldn’t simply want the abortion end of the business curtailed.


56 posted on 04/06/2016 6:20:11 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Actually punishment for harming another is reasonable and would be appropriate even for the mother. The punishment should be one where it could be set aside for mitigating circumstances, but the need for punishment for the breaking of laws is part of the teaching aspect of law, a concept almost absent in modern times.


57 posted on 04/06/2016 6:24:44 PM PDT by amihow (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

You are the one that lies

He very recently said planned parenthood does many wonderful things. Up until the campaign started he was strongly behind abortion.

But it’s good to know own you are OK with an organization that has played a major role in the murder of over 55 million babies.

Women need a doctor for their medical care. Not an organization that fights for the power to murder babies and sell their parts off. Not to mention their work to encourage promiscuity, to build demand ya know. Then there is their covering up of abuse and rape of young girls.

You should be ashamed.


58 posted on 04/06/2016 6:35:53 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

I am not ashamed of objecting to abortion.

I am not ashamed of wanting Trump to defund that part of it.

I am not ashamed of women having access to certain female centric services in isolated areas.

You on the other hand are not happy Trump said he will defund abortion services.

You are not happy he he is the first guy likely to be president who has advocated for this.

So go ahead an toss a hissy fit.


59 posted on 04/06/2016 6:38:32 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Then you wouldn’t punish murder? What a joke. God is busy.


60 posted on 04/06/2016 6:39:33 PM PDT by WENDLE (I guess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson