Posted on 04/03/2016 6:32:47 PM PDT by Kaslin
There used to be a rule in place – part of the sadly abandoned movements toward welfare reform in the 80s and 90s – which required food stamps recipients to do at least some work in order to receive the benefits if they were childless and able bodied. That rule was suspended in most places since the beginning of the crash in 2007, but now that unemployment is allegedly back down to nominal levels and the economy is “stable” across most of the country, that exception is being rolled back. This, of course, has liberals up in arms. (WaPo)
The 20-year-old rule — which was suspended in many states during the economic recession — requires that adults without children or disabilities must have a job in order to receive food stamps through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for more than three months, with some exceptions. Many states have begun to reimpose the federal rule as the economy recovers, with the largest group reviving it at the beginning of this year. As a result, many recipients’ three-month limit expires today, April 1.
The change has reignited a fierce debate between conservative leaders, who say waiving the mandate discourages people from working, and their liberal counterparts, who say the three-month time limit ignores the reality that jobs are still hard to come by for low-skilled workers.
Ah, yes. Those hateful Republicans are at it again, trying to demonize and punish the poor. But while we consider this question, let’s keep in mind that an experiment in precisely such a change has already been rolling out in Maine. We talked about this last month when the Left was all aflutter over that state’s decision to require ABAWD (able bodied adults without dependents) to put in some work while remaining on the SNAP program long term.
In the first three months after Maine’s work policy went into effect, its caseload of able-bodied adults without dependents plummeted by 80 percent, falling from 13,332 recipients in Dec. 2014 to 2,678 in March 2015.
There were plenty of job openings in Maine already and the result of that work requirement was a major savings for the taxpayer. As they found out, those who truly couldn’t work or needed to care for children were easily able to demonstrate that and their benefits continued uninterrupted. But a significant number of recipients were either able to find a job or, as it turned out, had been working under the table to avoid taxes and collecting benefits on top of that. Those individuals dropped off the rolls quickly.
As I noted last month, we can see the direct effect of going in the opposite direction on such policy by looking at New York City, where Mayor Bill de Blasio has essentially thrown welfare reform into reverse.
The number of New Yorkers on welfare is reportedly on the rise, with about 13,000 more people being added to the rolls during the mayor’s first year in office.
The New York Post is reporting that the cash assistance program swelled by 4 percent in 2014.
According to an advanced look at the “Poverty and Progress in New York” report, the jump comes the same year the city added around 90,000 jobs.
When you remove work requirements entirely for the childless, able bodied recipients, there will always be some percentage who will seek to game the system for their own advantage. That’s just a fact of life. (And before you get your liberal undies in a twist, this applies across all demographic lines.) These programs aren’t “punishing” anyone or discriminating. They are providing an incentive toward upward mobility and ensuring that only those truly in need are drawing down resources from the system.
In Maine (maybe elsewhere), you don’t even need a job. They offer community service or training which will qualify too. http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2016/02/maine-food-stamp-work-requirement-cuts-non-parent-caseload-by-80-percent
In the USSR, work is a duty and a matter of honor for every able-bodied citizen, in accordance with the principle: “He who does not work, neither shall he eat.” …How can they complain when even the Stalin constitution dared to paraphrase 2 Thessalonians 3:10?
We may as well use the phony employment statistics produced by this liberal administration to re-impose the work requirements. After all, we are nearing full employment!
Come on! Gibsmedats ain’t gonna work for no grub stub!
Because it dared to believe itself God.
“GET A JOB”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysKhbaLyIFw
NO PITY FOR THE LAZY!!!
Liberals have had their way long enough. Just look about at the devastation their way brought. It’s time to flip them the wee birdie, and say enough is enough.
there should be no benefits, period. Whether you work or not. Zero. Get a job, let your family take care of you or your church. Otherwise, die in the streets. The whole entitlement mentality would end in one generation.
Either churches would revive or people would be dying in heaps in the streets while shame would be on the churches.
A major trouble with doing this kind of thing through government is that it artificially sanitizes the situation as well as costing more than it ought to and glorifying an entrenched level of bureaucracy.
My sentiments as well. Cram their own phony stats down their throats.
right on!!!
We SHTRUGGLED, as the White House now says.
Does that include Tricare for the military, or their retirement?
why would even liberals be against someone working for assistance?
I don’t give a @#$ if they dig holes and fill them back up all day. It makes them prove they’re not worthless lazy bums.
As my Father told me more than once when I was a whiny Teenager, “Nobody owes you a living, so shut up and get back to work”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.