Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for Sarah Palin as Trump's Running Mate
04/03/2016 | Brices Crossroads

Posted on 04/03/2016 12:18:24 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads

As I watched Sarah Palin deliver a speech on behalf of Donald Trump the other day before an GOP establishment fundraiser in Wisconsin, I was struck by the enthusiastic response of the crowd. She received a standing ovation at the end. Ted Cruz, who followed her on the dais, received only light and intermittent applause. The contrast in their political skills was stark. Palin was the star who knew how to connect with, and hold, her audience. Cruz, not so much...

Let me say at the outset that I am analyzing this from a purely utilitarian and political point of view. Anyone with a white hot, visceral dislike of Sarah Palin or anyone who has swallowed the MSM narrative that she is a stupid, inarticulate rube is not likely to be voting for Donald Trump anyway. Trump obviously holds Palin in high regard and says so quite often, calling her an "amazing woman" and a "special person." If he did not consider her a genuine asset, why in the world would he have her campaigning with him all over the country?

Putting Palin on the ticket would have obvious advantages and disadvantages. The case for Palin as Trump's running mate boils down to six factors

I. The Trust Factor

First, there is an obvious chemistry between Trump and Palin that would be rare for two national candidates on the same ticket. They obviously like and respect each other immensely. And Trump obviously trusts her, which is so important. He cannot have a running mate who is apologizing for him or damning him with faint praise. Trump values loyalty and Sarah Palin is loyal to a fault, as is the Donald.

II. The Deflection Factor

The second advantage, which I would call the "deflection" factor, centers around the collective star power that a Trump/Palin ticket would embody. Both are media superstars of the first order. Having either one on a national ticket would draw disproportionate media interest and coverage for that ticket. Together, however, they would dominate every news cycle, pushing the Democrat candidates into oblivion. The Main Stream Media and the Establishment smear machine intends to try to destroy Donald Trump in the November Election. However, like Pavlov's dog, it simply cannot resist the urge to savage Sarah Palin. Palin's presence on the ticket would deflect much of the media onslaught away from Trump and would stretch the capacities of the smear machine to the breaking point.

III. The Woman Thing

The Democrat nominee is going to be a woman. Trump needs help with women. So isn't it logical to put a woman on the ticket? It is certainly not absolutely necessary but it would help. Palin brings several things to the ticket that a more conventional female politician would not bring. Let me concede at the outset that the majority of professional women (not all by any means) dislike Palin intensely. The majority of professional women also despise Trump. Most such women are likely not "getable" for Trump, not matter who he picks. However, a much larger swath of married women, evangelical women and working class women--the hair dressers, secretaries, waitresses and factory workers--ARE available, and Palin relates very well to this group. Palin's presence on the ticket can help to persuade, and to turn out, such voters.

Even more important, though, Palin's presence on the ticket would give Trump a unique opportunity to defend her against the inevitable and savage attacks by the elitist Establishment and the MSM. In so doing, Trump would give the lie to the baseless charge that he hates women. His actions in defending his running mate would speak much louder than any platitudes about taking care of women.

IV. The Insurance Policy

In a very important sense, Palin provides an insurance policy for Trump. When he is sworn into office, he will likely face a hostile Congress and Senate, with relatively few allies. Should Congress or the Establishment ever be tempted to impeach, or otherwise to remove, Trump the specter of Sarah Palin as President of the United States would surely represent a massive deterrent to such a scheme. If Trump's removal would yield a John Kasich or even a Ted Cruz, it would embolden the Establishment to try to get rid of Trump before his term ended.

V. The Geographic factor

The next advantage is geographic. Palin is a Westerner, with ties to North Dakota, Alaska and Arizona. Trump's weakest region, according to polls, is the mountain west. Putting her on the ticket would provide geographic balance.The counter-argument is that, in spite of her endorsement, Trump lost Alaska. My reply to that is that Palin has never been beloved by the Alaska GOP Establishment, ever since she took out its darling, Frank Murkowski, in 2006 and stopped the gravy train up there. And Alaska was a closed caucus, where the GOP Establishment would be its most powerful. Her appeal in Arizona and Nevada (and Florida) was quite evident in the Trump landslides there.

VI. The Vetting Factor

Finally, Palin has been vetted to a fare the well. No politician, and few public figures have been so thoroughly scrutinized. Trump does not need to suffer any distractions or surprises coming out this fall about a less thoroughly examined candidate.

Let me just say a word about her resignation as Governor in 2009 and her decision not to seek the GOP presidential nomination in 2012. Many of her supporters were disappointed in her decisions, especially in 2012. But I remember her appealing publicly to the Establishment in 2011 to be open to her candidacy as a vehicle to unseat Obama and repair the damage he had done to the country. I think her appeal fell on deaf ears, and she realized what many of us did not. She could not seize the nomination in the face of united Establishment opposition. Trump's difficulties with the Establishment, in spite of his far greater advantages, shows that she was more than likely right.

Ultimately, any voters Palin would lose for Trump would be more than offset by some of the voters she would take from Hillary Clinton, especially lower to middle income blue collar women and housewives. In essence, though, anyone who is dissuaded from voting for Donald Trump by Sarah Palin's presence on the ticket would likely not be voting for Trump in the first place. As I heard someone say recently, Palin is the female counterpart of Trump. If you really dislike the one, you almost certainly do not like the other.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2016veep; anothervanity; palin; trump; vanity; veepstakes; vicepresident; vp; vpsearch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-132 next last
To: Brices Crossroads

Thanks for the ping, fellow Palinista ;-)

I’ve also contemplated Sarah as Trump’s running mate, but I’m on the fence as to whether she’d be an asset or a liability.

She’s lost a good deal of her former cache’ over the last four years, and I don’t know that she can ever get it back. Had she run for and won a Senate seat four years ago, she’d have much more relevancy and bargaining power now. As it is, I’m not so sure her ‘stock value’ is high enough among rank and file Republican voters.

Never mind the swing voters who might be too turned off by her to vote for a Trump/Palin ticket.

For myself, I’d be thrilled with that combo, but I’m not exactly a representative of the broad voting public.


61 posted on 04/03/2016 12:58:17 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

You seem obsessed with bubbles...are you one of Cruz’s “foam” boys? Maybe you just like blowing bubbles?


62 posted on 04/03/2016 1:00:58 PM PDT by FrankR (You're only enslaved to the extent of the charity that you receive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

No.


63 posted on 04/03/2016 1:02:02 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

NOPE,,,Go home Sarah.


64 posted on 04/03/2016 1:03:30 PM PDT by rrrod (just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator

“Sarah quit her position as governor, for no good reason.”

Unbelievable that a single Freeper is still spouting that left wing LIE, when the TRUTH of what caused Sarah to resign as Governor, has been posted thousands of times on this website.


65 posted on 04/03/2016 1:03:38 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: babygene

“Isn’t it the party that has to be on the ballet, not the candidate?”

Where in the Constitution does it even mention political parties? See Article II, Section I, Clause V, for the exact eligibility requirements for being elected as president.

See anything about parties there? Nope.


66 posted on 04/03/2016 1:11:25 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: grania

“She’ll be a fantastic Secretary of Energy.”

_____________________________________

I could go for that, or Sec. of Interior. She has definitely earned herself a cabinet position...if she accepts that is.


67 posted on 04/03/2016 1:11:35 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Not Palin. That joke has played out. Let’s get serious, folks.


68 posted on 04/03/2016 1:11:45 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("You know who gets hurt? The people who worked hard, lived frugally, and saved their money."- Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I’m waiting for the frivolous suits to start against Trump as freeloaders and black ops people try to take him down by bankruptcy. Prayers offer up for Mr. Trump against the slings and arrows of the enemy.


69 posted on 04/03/2016 1:14:04 PM PDT by Ciexyz ("You know who gets hurt? The people who worked hard, lived frugally, and saved their money."- Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Of course they are. They all are. And a word is a word. I have nothing at all against Sarah. I happen to think she was so maligned that a lot of potential crossover votes would be lost is she was on the ticket.

People still believe a lot of the garbage said about her. And now a lot on the right don’t like her because she is supporting Trump.


70 posted on 04/03/2016 1:15:09 PM PDT by Ladysforest (Racism, misogyny, bigotry, xenophobia and vulgarity - with just a smattering of threats and violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Unfortunately I agree. I would love to see a Trump/Palin Administration but there is now way that duo would get elected in a general. Nearly every woman in America hates Sarah Palin with a passion. I mean literally hates her. I've learned never to bring up Sarah Palin in the company of women because so many of them get utterly hysterical with rage.

As a man, I can't understand why. But I think it's the jealousy factor. Sarah is over 50 years old and she looks fantastic and very feminine. Normally when women get over 50, they cut their hair short and stop wearing dresses and skirts. They do not like older women like Sarah Palin showing them up. That's just my theory anyhow.

71 posted on 04/03/2016 1:17:27 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Delegates So Far: Trump (736); Cruz (463); Rubio (171); Kasich (143)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator; danamco

>>>>Sarah quit her position as governor, for no good reason.<<<<

You know that is not true.

You’ve just outed yourself as a troll.


72 posted on 04/03/2016 1:21:38 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Artcore; grania

>>>>“She’ll be a fantastic Secretary of Energy.”

_____________________________________

I could go for that, or Sec. of Interior. She has definitely earned herself a cabinet position...if she accepts that is.<<<<

Agree with having Sarah in either position.


73 posted on 04/03/2016 1:25:36 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
He'd be better picking a favored conservative Governor.

I'd love to see Greg Abbott.

74 posted on 04/03/2016 1:27:20 PM PDT by TheWriterTX (Trust not in earthly princes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

GOD no! Cannot stand listening to a word she utters, especially with the stupid, un-human pauses blips and blaps. Woman is smart but needs a speech pathologist or surgery.


75 posted on 04/03/2016 1:29:16 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

76 posted on 04/03/2016 1:30:55 PM PDT by Kegger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Not gonna happen.


77 posted on 04/03/2016 1:42:04 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry; Brices Crossroads
Rightly or wrongly, Sarah Palin was damaged beyond electability in 2008. I’d vote for Trump/Palin, many on FR would, but the country at large would not. I hate that this is true, but it is.

I'll go after ANYBODY on FR that trash-talks Palin, but the Media DeathStar, while it was unable to destroy her, has made her BEYOND radioactive politically at a national level.

She can still influence state & local elections, which is why I said the Media DeathStar was unable to destroy her. Eff those treasonous effing effers.

78 posted on 04/03/2016 1:44:44 PM PDT by kiryandil (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

“The best duo would have been Trump and Cruz.”

And just whose fault is it that that has no chance of happening? Answer” Lyin’ Ted’s big mouth. I’d consider not supporting Trump if he picked Lyin’ Ted as a running mate.


79 posted on 04/03/2016 1:45:53 PM PDT by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine; samantha
It’s a shame that Palin went for the windbag.

Yeah.

Why DID she endorse Ted Cruz for the Senate, anyway?

80 posted on 04/03/2016 1:46:39 PM PDT by kiryandil (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson