Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case for Sarah Palin as Trump's Running Mate
04/03/2016 | Brices Crossroads

Posted on 04/03/2016 12:18:24 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads

As I watched Sarah Palin deliver a speech on behalf of Donald Trump the other day before an GOP establishment fundraiser in Wisconsin, I was struck by the enthusiastic response of the crowd. She received a standing ovation at the end. Ted Cruz, who followed her on the dais, received only light and intermittent applause. The contrast in their political skills was stark. Palin was the star who knew how to connect with, and hold, her audience. Cruz, not so much...

Let me say at the outset that I am analyzing this from a purely utilitarian and political point of view. Anyone with a white hot, visceral dislike of Sarah Palin or anyone who has swallowed the MSM narrative that she is a stupid, inarticulate rube is not likely to be voting for Donald Trump anyway. Trump obviously holds Palin in high regard and says so quite often, calling her an "amazing woman" and a "special person." If he did not consider her a genuine asset, why in the world would he have her campaigning with him all over the country?

Putting Palin on the ticket would have obvious advantages and disadvantages. The case for Palin as Trump's running mate boils down to six factors

I. The Trust Factor

First, there is an obvious chemistry between Trump and Palin that would be rare for two national candidates on the same ticket. They obviously like and respect each other immensely. And Trump obviously trusts her, which is so important. He cannot have a running mate who is apologizing for him or damning him with faint praise. Trump values loyalty and Sarah Palin is loyal to a fault, as is the Donald.

II. The Deflection Factor

The second advantage, which I would call the "deflection" factor, centers around the collective star power that a Trump/Palin ticket would embody. Both are media superstars of the first order. Having either one on a national ticket would draw disproportionate media interest and coverage for that ticket. Together, however, they would dominate every news cycle, pushing the Democrat candidates into oblivion. The Main Stream Media and the Establishment smear machine intends to try to destroy Donald Trump in the November Election. However, like Pavlov's dog, it simply cannot resist the urge to savage Sarah Palin. Palin's presence on the ticket would deflect much of the media onslaught away from Trump and would stretch the capacities of the smear machine to the breaking point.

III. The Woman Thing

The Democrat nominee is going to be a woman. Trump needs help with women. So isn't it logical to put a woman on the ticket? It is certainly not absolutely necessary but it would help. Palin brings several things to the ticket that a more conventional female politician would not bring. Let me concede at the outset that the majority of professional women (not all by any means) dislike Palin intensely. The majority of professional women also despise Trump. Most such women are likely not "getable" for Trump, not matter who he picks. However, a much larger swath of married women, evangelical women and working class women--the hair dressers, secretaries, waitresses and factory workers--ARE available, and Palin relates very well to this group. Palin's presence on the ticket can help to persuade, and to turn out, such voters.

Even more important, though, Palin's presence on the ticket would give Trump a unique opportunity to defend her against the inevitable and savage attacks by the elitist Establishment and the MSM. In so doing, Trump would give the lie to the baseless charge that he hates women. His actions in defending his running mate would speak much louder than any platitudes about taking care of women.

IV. The Insurance Policy

In a very important sense, Palin provides an insurance policy for Trump. When he is sworn into office, he will likely face a hostile Congress and Senate, with relatively few allies. Should Congress or the Establishment ever be tempted to impeach, or otherwise to remove, Trump the specter of Sarah Palin as President of the United States would surely represent a massive deterrent to such a scheme. If Trump's removal would yield a John Kasich or even a Ted Cruz, it would embolden the Establishment to try to get rid of Trump before his term ended.

V. The Geographic factor

The next advantage is geographic. Palin is a Westerner, with ties to North Dakota, Alaska and Arizona. Trump's weakest region, according to polls, is the mountain west. Putting her on the ticket would provide geographic balance.The counter-argument is that, in spite of her endorsement, Trump lost Alaska. My reply to that is that Palin has never been beloved by the Alaska GOP Establishment, ever since she took out its darling, Frank Murkowski, in 2006 and stopped the gravy train up there. And Alaska was a closed caucus, where the GOP Establishment would be its most powerful. Her appeal in Arizona and Nevada (and Florida) was quite evident in the Trump landslides there.

VI. The Vetting Factor

Finally, Palin has been vetted to a fare the well. No politician, and few public figures have been so thoroughly scrutinized. Trump does not need to suffer any distractions or surprises coming out this fall about a less thoroughly examined candidate.

Let me just say a word about her resignation as Governor in 2009 and her decision not to seek the GOP presidential nomination in 2012. Many of her supporters were disappointed in her decisions, especially in 2012. But I remember her appealing publicly to the Establishment in 2011 to be open to her candidacy as a vehicle to unseat Obama and repair the damage he had done to the country. I think her appeal fell on deaf ears, and she realized what many of us did not. She could not seize the nomination in the face of united Establishment opposition. Trump's difficulties with the Establishment, in spite of his far greater advantages, shows that she was more than likely right.

Ultimately, any voters Palin would lose for Trump would be more than offset by some of the voters she would take from Hillary Clinton, especially lower to middle income blue collar women and housewives. In essence, though, anyone who is dissuaded from voting for Donald Trump by Sarah Palin's presence on the ticket would likely not be voting for Trump in the first place. As I heard someone say recently, Palin is the female counterpart of Trump. If you really dislike the one, you almost certainly do not like the other.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2016veep; anothervanity; palin; trump; vanity; veepstakes; vicepresident; vp; vpsearch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-132 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2016 12:18:24 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: onyx; Windflier; xzins

Ping


2 posted on 04/03/2016 12:19:59 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

They’re not going to let Trump or Cruz be the nominee....better not count any chickens.


3 posted on 04/03/2016 12:20:58 PM PDT by MarMema ("if voting made any difference, they wouldn't let us do it" mark twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Aside from the fact Sarah has no traction with Congress, to go along with Trump’s lack of same, what could go wrong?


4 posted on 04/03/2016 12:21:52 PM PDT by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Sounds good to me.

I hope the Trump/Palin ticket will beat the Clinton/whoever ticket decisively.


5 posted on 04/03/2016 12:21:52 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

“They” can kma.


6 posted on 04/03/2016 12:23:23 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

You people just won’t stop


7 posted on 04/03/2016 12:24:04 PM PDT by Jack Straw from Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

8 posted on 04/03/2016 12:24:25 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Trump is going to win enough delgates and will be the nominee

GOP messes with Trump than I guess #BLM and Move on. Org will have company protesting Cleveland

9 posted on 04/03/2016 12:25:10 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Step outside of the Trump bubble and step into reality.
Actually, stay within the bubble, as at least that will
minimize your contact with normal people, who would rather not be in your presence.


10 posted on 04/03/2016 12:25:14 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

A very practical concern. The best duo would have been Trump and Cruz. We could have held the White Hut for 16 years. We now know that was never the GOPe’s intention, may they all burn.


11 posted on 04/03/2016 12:25:28 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

I don’t think so,Todd will need extensive care and rehab for the next year,and they already have shown in the end,Inc,communist media etc. That will spend 24/7 trashing her and her family. I would like to see her in a cabinet position.


12 posted on 04/03/2016 12:25:50 PM PDT by samantha (keep up the fight....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Rightly or wrongly, Sarah Palin was damaged beyond electability in 2008. I’d vote for Trump/Palin, many on FR would, but the country at large would not. I hate that this is true, but it is.


13 posted on 04/03/2016 12:25:59 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

As much as I like how she makes liberal heads explode, Sarah quit her position as governor, for no good reason. Permanently disqualifying her from every holding elective office again, in my opinion.


14 posted on 04/03/2016 12:26:09 PM PDT by TheConservator ("I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jack Straw from Wichita

Whatever, yuh wascist, whack job, nOOb....


15 posted on 04/03/2016 12:26:23 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

I disagree that Ms. Palin would ‘lose’ many voters for Mr. Trump. This is a significantly different election this time around, and many of us reckon it’s our final chance to peacefully effect meaningful change.

Ms. Palin would only add to Mr. Trump’s historic numbers.


16 posted on 04/03/2016 12:26:38 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

It’s a shame that Palin went for the windbag.


17 posted on 04/03/2016 12:27:39 PM PDT by John Valentine ( Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone
> Ms. Palin would only add to Mr. Trump’s historic numbers.

That's probably true, but not in the direction Trump is hoping for.

18 posted on 04/03/2016 12:29:01 PM PDT by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

You had a rough childhood eh? Explains a lot. Sort of obvious.


19 posted on 04/03/2016 12:29:10 PM PDT by samantha (keep up the fight....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
As I watched Sarah Palin deliver a speech on behalf of Donald Trump the other day before an GOP establishment fundraiser in Wisconsin, I was struck by the enthusiastic response of the crowd. She received a standing ovation at the end. Ted Cruz, who followed her on the dais, received only light and intermittent applause. The contrast in their political skills was stark. Palin was the star who knew how to connect with, and hold, her audience. Cruz, not so much...

I heard the exact opposite to this...

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/04/02/sarah-palin/

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/cruz-walker-embrace-wisconsin-crowd-goes-silent-palin-n549611
20 posted on 04/03/2016 12:29:11 PM PDT by mlizzy (America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe/Wade has deformed a great nation. -MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator

Well, I’d vote for on hotness alone.../S


21 posted on 04/03/2016 12:29:35 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
Step outside of the Trump bubble and step into reality. Actually, stay within the bubble, as at least that will minimize your contact with normal people, who would rather not be in your presence.

No coffee this morning?

22 posted on 04/03/2016 12:30:11 PM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

They meet one week before the convention to change/set any rules they want, including the required number of delegates to be the nominee. They have changed it in the padt . If Trump gets 1400, they can make the magic number 1500.

And only four states would allow Trump to file under another party or indie.

Keep dreaming. I wish I believed in unicorns too.

The RNC has their own nominee waiting in the wings.


23 posted on 04/03/2016 12:30:11 PM PDT by MarMema ("if voting made any difference, they wouldn't let us do it" mark twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

A non starter


24 posted on 04/03/2016 12:31:23 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Agree 100%.


25 posted on 04/03/2016 12:32:33 PM PDT by TheWriterTX (Trust not in earthly princes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

I’m not here to simply bash someone else’s candidate. So don’t take any offense. I’m very learned about politics and I just think Cruz is not presidential. For one, he’s only a senator. And he kind of skeeve’s me out.

I want a President the world FEARS. The world hates and fears Trump. Done deal.


26 posted on 04/03/2016 12:32:37 PM PDT by bicyclerepair (Ft. Lauderdale FL (zombie land). TERM LIMITS ... TERM LIMITS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator

“Sarah quit her position as governor, for no good reason.”

For no good reason you say? Wrong!

To research the truth these days you have to circumvent the msm and venture into the alternative media. And talk to people who are in the know.

Your assignment for tonight is to find out just why the former Governor had little choice but to resign. Report back to us by Tuesday.


27 posted on 04/03/2016 12:33:41 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
You are full of it,saying she quit for no good reason says you were not paying attention,or did not care. Do the research,the come back and apologize for being an uniformed yutz.
28 posted on 04/03/2016 12:33:45 PM PDT by samantha (keep up the fight....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

Well from the “insurance policy” standpoint, Cruz and Palin are about equal.


29 posted on 04/03/2016 12:34:20 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Fine by me.


30 posted on 04/03/2016 12:34:29 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Picking Palin would be out of the box thinking. How could Trump pick another candidate that even more hated than he is, is how most people think. Both Trump and Palin have charisma that Cruz lack. Palin will carry on Trump’s legacy because politically they’re very similar. Palin was actually the one who came up with the Common Sense Conservative moniker that Trump thought he came up with first


31 posted on 04/03/2016 12:34:51 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
The best duo would have been Trump and Cruz.

Besides the fact that Cruz is ineligible, I wouldn't get within 10 miles of Cruz after this campaign. He has shown himself to be a fraud, a phony and slimy as can be. Cruz will have a difficult time getting reelected to the senate.

32 posted on 04/03/2016 12:34:53 PM PDT by upsdriver (I support Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

I really like Sarah but her 15 minutes of fame has come and gone. I doubt she would help Trump much.


33 posted on 04/03/2016 12:34:58 PM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
"Sarah quit her position as governor, for no good reason."

You've been on FR since 2000 and you have the nerve to post that falsehood here ? She and her family were being BANKRUPTED by her opponents filing frivolous ethics charges against her in office. She had to personally pay lawyers to defend herself against these unfounded allegations that well exceeded her salary as Governor. Let's see how well you'd do in her shoes, Hoss.

34 posted on 04/03/2016 12:35:32 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Ivanka will be 35 before Election Day. She would throw a wrench in people’s anti trump stances


35 posted on 04/03/2016 12:36:20 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

As far as the Establishment lie that State sore loser laws would block a 3rd party run by any of the candidates, The rules that say who can run and the requirements for them are stated clearly in the US Constitution. It overrules State laws that violate it. Sore loser laws add to and run counter to the US Constitution that sets out the requirements to run for office.

So no sore loser laws have any validity where the US Constitution states the qualifications for federal offices.


36 posted on 04/03/2016 12:37:05 PM PDT by Mechanicos (Attend a Trump Rally and get to "Punch a Commie for Mommy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

“And only four states would allow Trump to file under another party or indie.”

Isn’t it the party that has to be on the ballet, not the candidate?

Wouldn’t he just have to be selected as such a party’s candidate?


37 posted on 04/03/2016 12:37:23 PM PDT by babygene (Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

She did not go for the perverted windbag,don’t you remember she is backing Donald trump?


38 posted on 04/03/2016 12:38:05 PM PDT by samantha (keep up the fight....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

No. Too much blast from the past. Besides, just like Trump, she has legions of enemies on both sides of the isle. Donald is controversial enough all by himself, so he needs a VP who easier who presents a more neutral tone, making it easier to unify people. I have always liked Mike Pence, he just needs to keep away from the abortion and gay rights rhetoric minefields.


39 posted on 04/03/2016 12:38:06 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

You are correct. Too polarizing. And she would scare away most crossover voters, which republicans will need against either Hill or The Communist.


40 posted on 04/03/2016 12:38:36 PM PDT by Ladysforest (Racism, misogyny, bigotry, xenophobia and vulgarity - with just a smattering of threats and violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy
Why Don't you listen for yourself instead of spewing crap from Palin haters. Jeesh...
41 posted on 04/03/2016 12:40:46 PM PDT by samantha (keep up the fight....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

BTTT


42 posted on 04/03/2016 12:40:50 PM PDT by varon (There's always room for one more on the hanging tree.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

It is upsetting how many people forget the facts, and you are absolutely correct to point it out. No matter what they want to say about governor Palin, she was the victim of an open conspiracy, likely from the exact same elitists orchestrating the smear campaign against today’s outsiders. She was an outstanding, popular governor. Governor Palin was as good as a political martyr in my book. Let someone with an 89% approval rating dispute it or say something contrary and I will give it a listen and a good laugh.


43 posted on 04/03/2016 12:41:14 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ladysforest

polarizing is nonsense. Stop using the media’s language. If she is polarizing then so is cruz and trump


44 posted on 04/03/2016 12:41:29 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Well somebody better tell Trump........

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3417131/posts?

snip

He said he would choose “somebody that can walk into the Senate and who’s been friendly
with these guys for 25 years, and people for 25 years and can get things done” in an
extensive interview with The Washington Post published Saturday.

“So I would 95 percent see myself picking a political person, as opposed to
somebody from the outside,” he said.


45 posted on 04/03/2016 12:42:08 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Maybe she could be the second term VP! ;-)


46 posted on 04/03/2016 12:44:22 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: babygene

It’s called sore loser man laws. Because Trump has already run under RNC he is not allowed to switch parties. I will try to find the thread about it and ping you.


47 posted on 04/03/2016 12:46:18 PM PDT by MarMema ("if voting made any difference, they wouldn't let us do it" mark twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Wow what a brilliant response, brilliant I tell you. Did you think that up in the 3rd grade and have been using that ever since?


48 posted on 04/03/2016 12:47:02 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

No. Rightly or wrongly Palin has been so trampled in the media she is not the right choice.


49 posted on 04/03/2016 12:47:39 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Sara Palin is great, but she will not reassure voters who still have to be won over to Trump. Besides that she doesn’t have DC experience. She’ll be a fantastic Secretary of Energy.


50 posted on 04/03/2016 12:49:23 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson