Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz for Supreme Court
Townhall.com ^ | March 29, 2016 | George Mano

Posted on 03/30/2016 2:01:25 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2016 2:01:25 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We don’t need another John Roberts on the Supreme Court.


2 posted on 03/30/2016 2:02:55 PM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is there a RAT PROBLEM there for the
CuboCanadian globalist?


3 posted on 03/30/2016 2:03:59 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

At least he’s probably eligible for that.


4 posted on 03/30/2016 2:04:07 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Unacceptable.


5 posted on 03/30/2016 2:04:56 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We don’t need another lying, manipulative scum on the Supreme Court, who would be bought by the highest bidder.


6 posted on 03/30/2016 2:05:13 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Ted Cruz for Horse Barn “valet!” Let the job fit the qualifications of the applicant!
7 posted on 03/30/2016 2:05:20 PM PDT by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Can’t imagine why...

He is not a legal expert.


8 posted on 03/30/2016 2:06:07 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

9 posted on 03/30/2016 2:07:21 PM PDT by paintriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I could go for this.

If Cruz would stand down about the presidential nomination, I could support this.

But Cruz needs to stand down.


10 posted on 03/30/2016 2:09:14 PM PDT by cba123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bang of Eight for the Gang of Nine?


11 posted on 03/30/2016 2:09:23 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well, that’s one way to hide him away; mainly so the RNC doesn’t have to deal with him and all his law knowledge; heaven forbid that Cruz would expose their lawlessness.

He doesn’t want to be on the Supreme Court.

Before you start shoving people into other positions, maybe it might work better if you knew what they wanted .. just a thought.


12 posted on 03/30/2016 2:11:22 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

At this point, I suggest someone truthful may make a better choice on the Supreme Court.


13 posted on 03/30/2016 2:11:36 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (BREAKING.... Vulgarian Resistance begins attack on the GOPe Death Star.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Those who oppose Cruz need to look at his actual positions, his actual votes, and his actual words. He has a 97% to 100% conservative rating for a reason. If you don't like him, fine. Don't have a beer with him, but don't destroy America in your rejection of Cruz. Can anyone who objects to Cruz on the Court name a better choice? Four better choices (Trump's likely number of nominees)? Can you name a constitutional issue on which Cruz has been wrong even one tenth of the time?

14 posted on 03/30/2016 2:12:38 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I seriously doubt that Hillary Clinton will be nominating Ted Cruz for the SCOTUS.


15 posted on 03/30/2016 2:13:06 PM PDT by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No. Cruz should see if he can finish term as senator.


16 posted on 03/30/2016 2:16:58 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Cruz would probably make a good Justice, but does anybody seriously think the current Senate would confirm him? People like McCain, Graham, Collins, Flake and the rest would quickly cross over to defeat him.


17 posted on 03/30/2016 2:22:06 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

BINGO


18 posted on 03/30/2016 2:22:52 PM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They’re kidding, right?


19 posted on 03/30/2016 2:26:06 PM PDT by patlin ("Knowledgee chosen to participate inthat is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I use to think that but no more.


20 posted on 03/30/2016 2:32:40 PM PDT by MamaB (Heb. 13:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson