Posted on 03/30/2016 9:37:02 AM PDT by Rusty0604
Don’t that just figure?
Since most spree shooters have been liberal dims, and that most gun violence in this country takes place in areas that often see over 100% voter turnout for dims, I’d say it would be much more dangerous for guns to be at the dim convention.
Besides, if shooting started Hillary would wait several hours before calling for help and then blame the shooting on those filming the convention.
Allow guns into a Republican convention and you'd have guns on the floor. Allow them into a Democrat convention and you'd have an ocean of blood on the floor. That's the difference between the two parties.
There is a certain effectiveness to the movement. It illustrates that totally unregulated gun possession is not practical. And apparently there aren’t many who actually support it.
Wasn’t the guy that a black Trump supporter punched dressed as a KKK?
She is scared to death of Trump.
funny thing is that while I don’t like open carry I have no problem with conceal carry. once you show a hand gun that is a threatening move. when the weapon is concealed it is not threatening and is there for an emergency when it is revealed.
funny thing is that while I don’t like open carry I have no problem with conceal carry. once you show a hand gun that is a threatening move. when the weapon is concealed it is not threatening and is there for an emergency when it is revealed.
Allowing firearms to the convention is a great idea, as long as Democrats can be identified by a background check, and aren’t allowed to carry. Normal gun-owners are OK, though.
I agree conceal carry is better. Just because you have the right to open carry doesn’t mean it makes more sense to. I’ll just keep mine in my purse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.