Posted on 03/29/2016 1:10:40 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Yeah, pretty much. I don’t think Trump can beat Hillary, but if he doesn’t, it won’t be my fault.
Ya think?
Not done by Cruz, that’s what it was.
We’ve known Ann is mental for some time now.
Now I’m confused again. Wasn’t she completely rehabilitated due to her rumbustious support of He-Man Trump?
This is starting to feel like the Soviet Union. Miss one memo, and Zot! that’s it for you!
You must not have been here, or didn’t pay attention.
It was ‘magnificent,’ not ‘glorious.’
Man, that’s calling the pot calling the kettle black
Evidently you unilaterally decided she was completely rehabilitated.
That’s on you.
Time to defect.
OK, my memory failed me on that distinction.
Is Cruz Mental or is it he likes to meet young females at a rental? I get confused.
Then you should have gone to that thread running today where the majority of Trumpers said they wouldn't vote for Cruz if he were the nominee. Saturday, numerous Cruz supporters were kicked off the site for saying they wouldn't vote for Trump. Interesting times around here.
Ann is old.
If you are over 40, you aren’t going to get it.
LOLOLing at both of y’alls comments.
At least we know Ann hasn’t lost her famous courage to speak her mind.
If Donald Trump hears that Ann’s called him ‘’mental’’ and other unflattering things, his likeliest response will be to attack her looks — for example, by announcing that ‘’She’s no longer a 10!’’ as he said about Heidi Klum, or he could find the most unflattering picture of Ann ever taken and have his friends at the National Enquirer spread it across their cover next week.
>>Maybe there are a lot of voters like me out there: if they polled me, I would say I have a negative view of Trump. However, I will vote for him if he’s the Republican nominee, out of hatred for Hillary.<<
When you vote for someone to be President of the U.S., you’re explicitly stating that you want that person to be your leader. There is no way in hell I would express that wish, whether my choice be Hillary, Trump, or for that matter, Bernie.
If a third party option doesn’t present itself, I’ll vote down ballot and leave the top line blank. I will not put myself in the position of having to admit to my children and grandchildren that I once seriously considered Donald Trump as a potential leader of the free world.
Now, Rush Limbaugh has more or less stated that such a position disqualifies those of us who think as I do from commenting on the race. Nonsense. Just because he and millions of Trump followers, and Coulter as well, have decided they can stomach an oaf like Trump as their leader is no reason for the rest of us to bow to their wishes.
What Trump’s followers need to realize is that for most of them (outside the FR world anyway) Cruz is an acceptable alternative whereas for most non-Trump voters, Trump is not an acceptable alternative. Common sense would then dictate that Cruz is the more electable candidate, and I’ll leave it at that, except for saying that Cruz was hardly my first choice, but I’m willing to accept him as President. As for Trump; no.
Anybody looking for happiness in politics is a child.
Politics is war, and war is ugly. And the winners of wars are not the pretty ones. We can vote for Mitt's status quo grinning white teeth, Bernie's skittles and rainbows and starvation, Cruz's globalist totalitarianism, Hillary's Auschwitz dreams, or for Trump to grease the treads of our tanks with the guts of our enemies ala' Patton.
That's it. Heaven is for the next life, not this one.
Of course Trump is "mental". Anyone that has followed his career and "The Apprentice" knows he is firing on 8 cylinders when he only has 6 available. Trump is a thin-skinned megalomaniac that has managed to say all the right generalities for the PO'd conservatives. He's a poor debater, has no statesmanship, and switches his positions like every other GOPe - not to mention he's supported SO many liberal causes in the past.
The above said, I am now saddened to watch Cruz get sucked into the mud-raking. The Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute put him in the top percentile as a conservative. He actually has fought the DC elites, although some say he didn't do enough. I say you can only do so much when fighting the establishment. Still, he is not the new Reagan I first saw.
I've been trying to stay away from these threads regarding Cruz vs Trump as I've watched the crap fly. Both are now disappointing and an embarrassment to me, not to mention some world leaders. This presidential cycle is the most bizarre since Perot "Well, we'll just fix it" handed the Oval Office to Billy-boy, the womanizer.
Of course, I will vote against Hillary - obviously guilty of RICO and National Security laws. I personally believe the FBI will submit a recommendation for indictment via a Grand Jury they probably already have in place. Obama's puppet Attorney General will not indict, but the specifics will get out before November and Hillary will be dead in the water.
Then what will Trump or Cruz do against Bernie, the admitted socialist leader of the "gimmes" in debates? I believe Cruz can detail to the "common people" the benefits of capitalism and the FF's ideals, not so such for Trump. He would just repeat, "We'll fix it, and I'll put up a wall and make Mexico pay for it". Trump's advisors are clueless. All they need do is look at the highly successful double patrolled fence in California that reduced illegal immigration to some 95% (thanks to Rep. Duncan Hunter, Sr.). That's why Arizona became such a problem with no such barrier. And that's why I became a Minuteman.
This was our last opportunity to reverse course of our Republic's slide into pure socialism, of which we are somewhat now. I no longer believe we will not become a EU entity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.