Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects suit against Colorado over marijuana law
Reuters ^ | 03/24/16

Posted on 03/21/2016 4:46:56 PM PDT by Wolfie

Supreme Court rejects suit against Colorado over marijuana law

The Supreme Court on Monday threw out a lawsuit filed by the states of Nebraska and Oklahoma against their neighbor Colorado over a law approved as a ballot initiative by Colorado voters in 2012 that allows the recreational use of marijuana. The court declined to hear the case filed by Nebraska and Oklahoma, which said that marijuana is being smuggled across their borders and noted that federal law still prohibits the drug.

Two conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, said they would have heard the case.

Nebraska and Oklahoma contended that drugs such as marijuana threaten the health and safety of children and argued that Colorado had created "a dangerous gap" in the federal drug control system. Colorado stands by its law.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cannabis; co; colorado; marijuana; pot; wod; wosd

1 posted on 03/21/2016 4:46:56 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Yay, 10th Amendment!


2 posted on 03/21/2016 4:48:26 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

SCOTUS.


3 posted on 03/21/2016 4:48:50 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Thomas and Alito vote against States’ Rights.


4 posted on 03/21/2016 4:52:13 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Not true for sure. They could have heard it and upheld states rights.


5 posted on 03/21/2016 4:57:24 PM PDT by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Amazing how liberals favor States’ Rights when the “right” in question is a cause they support, like legalizing drugs. In any other case, the very idea of federalism meets with their contempt.


6 posted on 03/21/2016 4:59:22 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

As long as it doesnt cross the border, then let them get all Rocky Mountain high.


7 posted on 03/21/2016 5:03:43 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimpick
Not true for sure. They could have heard it and upheld states rights.

Or they could have heard it and explained to them that as long as Wickard v Filburn stands they don't have any.

8 posted on 03/21/2016 5:15:01 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

We have a moral problem, not a drug availability problem.

Moral problems will always find something to feed them. It might even be viewed as helpful (in identifying the moral problems) that they show up as drug addictions.

The evangelists of yesteryear did not show up at toney establishments; they showed up at the bowery and skid row and the bars. Because that’s where the people that most obviously needed help were.

We’ve essentially accepted a weaker and weaker and weaker God as we point the fingers of responsibility away from the addicts and towards the items addicted to. Because a TV addiction or a porn addiction is neater on the surface than a drug addiction, we deem it better. But maybe it’s actually a whitewash.


9 posted on 03/21/2016 5:16:12 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Ask those same liberals why each state can’t make up it’s own mind about......abortion.


10 posted on 03/21/2016 5:26:49 PM PDT by ChuteTheMall (Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
federal law still prohibits the drug.

Federal law also forces you to buy health insurance from them.

See the problem yet?

11 posted on 03/21/2016 5:38:47 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

ALL KNEEL! The pedophiles and lesbian freak sisters are going to speak!


12 posted on 03/21/2016 6:23:02 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (America is not a dump, sewer or "refugee" camp. It's my home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
ALL KNEEL!

Actually, this decision means that Colorado doesn't have to kneel to Nebraska, Oklahoma, or the feds on this issue.

13 posted on 03/22/2016 10:39:00 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (Trump fans:'he's no more conservative than Mitt'-www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3389209/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Or they could have heard it and explained to them that as long as Wickard v Filburn stands they [states] don't have any [rights].

Thomas has gone further than any post-Wickard justice in questioning its "substantial effect" standard.

14 posted on 03/22/2016 10:42:16 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (Trump fans:'he's no more conservative than Mitt'-www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3389209/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

15 posted on 03/22/2016 7:01:45 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson