Posted on 03/12/2016 8:56:37 AM PST by Treeless Branch
All of the Republicans I know would rather fight someone on the ideas rather than resort to fisticuffs.
For this to be even thought as a solution is a result of the fact that Trump brings out the worst in people.
NO
Not a good idea. In fact, I’d say you’re on the wrong side and trying to be clever.
I think two wrongs tend to cancel each other out. I would not hesitate to yell “rapist enabler” or “traitor” at a Clinton rally. But, trouble is, it is not a good tactic. After having a bit of an optical advantage by Trump brusquely ordering the protesters out of his rallies, and then an assault on of the thugs, the other side lost that advantage entirely by their antics in Chi-town and Dayton. They are now on the losing end of a media cycle that, hopefully will continue. Everyone who sees these tirds know who is wrong and who is right. Why spoil it.
Exactly.
Meh.
It would only give them free airtime. Make them pay for it.
Trump has owned the airwaves since 8:00pm last night. You can’t pay for that kind of media time.
No. We are better than that.
I was planning to show up to a democrat primary to protest Hillary by voting for Bernie Sanders. Not to start a fight.
From Powerline: “Blaming Trump for inflammatory rhetoric would make sense if his followers were roaming the streets attacking passers-by, or infiltrating Clinton and Sanders rallies and attacking Democrats. But they aren’t. Not a single such instance has occurred. On the contrary, every violent or disruptive event has involved people associated with the Democratic Party trying to prevent Trump from being heard. Whose inflammatory rhetoric has inspired them? Certainly not Trump’s. The brownshirts are all on the left.”
I’m ready!!! i fought leftists in the streets with Protest Warrior 10+ years ago....ready to renew the battle!!
Very bad idea. Your posting is a FAIL.
Absolutely not. That’s a terrible idea. Not only would the blame fall back on Trump and conservatives, but really, do we want to sink to their level? I certainly don’t.
No, that’s WRONG. We have to defend our 1st Amendment Rights to freedom of assembly. Disrupting their venues does just the opposite. We would lose the moral high ground.
The left is in great fear of Donald Trump. He was the first candidate to go against political correctness and refused to back down when the big corporations and media started to put pressure on him.
CAN YOU SAY LANDSLIDE for trump!
We stay away. Far away.
That way they can not call a false flag attack and put the blame on us.
Remember thevoter intimidation and violence by the pro-Obama SEIU back in 2008 and how the media just about ignored it?
It would have been front page headlines if the perps were TEA Party members.
Remember the voter intimidation by the Black Panthers in 2008?
Would the adminstration have dismissed charges against them if if they had been white skinheads instead of black racists?
Some Freepers in pulled down ski masks with Sickle and Hammer Flags in the crowds of the unwashed would be a good touch. But redundant as there would already be the real deal already there.
Personally, I do not have any problems with beating the crap out of individuals who interrupt conservative political rallies— as long as the people delivering the beating say “this is for the first amendment” every time they hit the dumsumbeech— but I don’t want to interrupt their rallies. Nothing defeats the idiocy of the statists like their own words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
