Posted on 03/11/2016 10:28:32 AM PST by SueRae
This is awesome to watch. Catherine Herridge is the best. It is now clear that she has a strong FBI source very close to this case. I suspect the FBI is using this tactic to keep obama and hillary honest. Of Course, we all know that her reference to “a security investigation” is another lie. Also this is an intimidation tool on hillary underlings who do not have the assurance of clemency that hillary has already obtained from obama. These people can go to prison if they don’t cooperate. “Devastating witness” was used by the leaker for a purpose to impute aggressive prosecution.
I am getting more optimistic that she may be exposed as a criminal whose conduct prohibits her from holding office. Trump will have a field day with her as a liar and a criminal.
Lerner was doing Obama’s business for “selfless” ideological reasons.
Hillary was doing her own business for selfish reasons.
Was anyone doubting that Hillary’s emailing came from her phones?
Today's America is not the same one you and I grew up in, and I doubt thst you would recognize the AF now. If she gets in there, we won't even have a Country when she's done.
Right you are, Mr. J. I remember Carl from Oyster Bay (Carl Limbacher who went on to found Newsmax) breathlessly telling radio legend Bob Grant how Bildo Klintoon completely lost it before the grand jury. Turns out Carl based that on sources who were put out there by Sid Blumenthal to create that false impression across the media. It worked, of course, because people saw the testimony of a calm Clinton instead of the red-faced lunatic who couldn't control his anger over the questioning and the cover up of his lies was completed in plain sight.
So source shmource as far as I'm concerned. Until she's in handcuffs, it's all BS.
Of course, what good is a devastating witness, without a fearless honest prosecutor?
Imagine somewhere along the line if one of them just said, "Screw it! I don't even like these creeps. Give me witness protection and I'll tell you everything I know. With proof."
Maybe this guy is the one. Maybe Lucy won't move the football this time.
I’ve thought about this quite a bit and agree.
I believe she certainly is guilty... it goes along with a long chain of abuses and foibles and outright crimes.
But when the gov thinks about a couple tens of millions of dollars spent, they have to think about something else as well.
A Presidential pardon.
That’s the bottom line. Even if Hillary is indicted, Zero has unlimited power to pardon her. And you can bet your bottom dollar he will!
BTW, I checked your home page. Don't feel bad, my first vote was in '72, for McGovern. I followed that with a vote for Carter...lol.
I made up for it in '80, though. My German neighbors were scared to death of Reagan (they were low information...lol). By then, my German was good enough to engage them in political conversation. The light came on Inauguration Day, when the Iranian hostages landed at Ramstein.
If this is the same agency that was involved with the apprehension at the wildlife preserve in Oregon, there’s no way in hell Hillary is charged.
Lois Lerner and her husband did not treat Barack and Michelle Obama like nig***s, so yes, I do think HRC, WJC, and Chelsea Mevzinsky are all going to prison.
They said they were kidding about putting my picture on the net.
I’m gonna get them! But first I need a sandwich.
I'm wondering if Catherine Herridge's source might not be right at the very top of the FBI.
The importance of this story is NOT in the information it provides about Clinton, which should be harmful to her; rather it is the fact that sources high in the FBI are happily leaking it. They’re putting down a marker....either Clinton gets indicted, or the whole story gets leaked...creating a huge problem for the DoJ
You’ve touched on something that I wondered about while reading the story. Catherine Herridge (sp?) has certainly been getting some interesting information lately. I commend her efforts. However, I can’t help but believe that these leaks are, at least, being allowed by the FBI organization. If they weren’t “ok”, the leaks would have been shut down. So that begs the question, why are these leaks allowed? You’ve offered a very plausible explanation.
I’ve prayed for forgiveness ever since, lol (seriously though, I can’t do enough penance for that). The one good thing is, it made me determined to never be that uninformed and herd mentality about voting and politics ever again as long as I live. I’ve done my darndest to keep to that, even when it comes to candidates on “our side”). It’s kind of like, no one is more against smoking than a reformed smoker (though I hope I’m never such a pain in the azz as some of them are).
Ken Starr Redux.
IF - BIG IF - this is true, they oughtta put him in witness protection. See “Danny Casolaro”.
I hadn’t read that. That’s important. Lynch blinked. The leaks are getting to her.
As in James Comey? lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.