Posted on 03/07/2016 6:48:44 PM PST by Kaslin
Edited on 03/07/2016 7:16:52 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
No, they can use him to sponge up a few delegates in proportional States and keep Cruz from picking up delegates, and keep him from winning more States, keep him away from the nominating threshold at the convention.
Even out of the running, Rubio is still working for them. They obviously think so, since Romney/GOP-e is doing promo work geared to Rubio's campaign.
No, Mr. Obama was a state legislator for three terms before running for the US Senate. This is Mr. Cruz’s first elective office, so he has slightly more political experience than Abraham Lincoln did in 1860.
Vote Trump - he actually has some “Tiger Orange” about him and freely admits he’s a meat eater - no political nuances about the guy.
Ted Cruz or Donald Trump. This is not a lady-or-the-tiger dilemma, but a tiger-or-tiger one.......
History has shown that each party picks a loser, presents them as their candidate and then the voters have to pick which of the two is the least loser. In this years pending election, it will be pretty much the same thing as little has changed except for one thing, Trump seems to be the least loser.
A vote for Cruz, Rubio, or Kasich is a vote for Romney! Vote Trump!
That worked out well for the South...
Reality bites but it is reality until the People get a LOT more involved in the process. Here's hoping enough on our side understand that while a win may not be as good as they would like, another loss would be at least as bad as they can imagine....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.