Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Broward judge to hear case on whether Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are 'natural born citizens'
Tampa Bay Times ^ | Mar 3, 2016 | Amy Sherman

Posted on 03/04/2016 3:26:49 AM PST by Ray76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: Ray76
Cruz said he would “let others worry about the silly stuff” - which is a complete lack of due diligence.

He/s letting others worry abut the "silly stuff?" That from a Harvard lawyer w/ two Ivy League degrees does give one pause.

Cruz has no one to blame but himself for his predicament.

Amen.

61 posted on 03/04/2016 6:09:32 AM PST by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV
When did Trump plant a seed?

CRUZ did by his very existence!

Born in Canada.
Father not a U.S. citizen.
No record of his normalization of his U.S. citizenship.
Canadian citizen into his 40s.
Parents permanently settled in Canada into his 4th year.
And..I have read that Cruz's mother voted in Canadian elections.

Trump didn't plant any of these “seeds”!

62 posted on 03/04/2016 6:11:03 AM PST by wintertime (Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Harpotoo
That/s so true....shouldn/t have to ask b/c he/s been
spotted at hockey games wearing his Mounty uniform.


63 posted on 03/04/2016 6:13:57 AM PST by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

“It didn’t work, and if it ever did in the past it never will again.”

The natural born clause didnt work because it was ignored. And here we are, the republican side, trying our level best to ignore it again.

I shall repeat..... The founders are frowning upon us.


64 posted on 03/04/2016 6:15:04 AM PST by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
I shall repeat..... The founders are frowning upon us.

And I shall repeat.... you're wanting to use the letter of the law to violate the intent, and I think your confidence in their approval is badly misplaced.

65 posted on 03/04/2016 6:18:58 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

And you are certainly entitled to your opinion.


66 posted on 03/04/2016 6:21:11 AM PST by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
And you are certainly entitled to your opinion.

We both are entitled to our opinions. Neither of us is entitled to present them as fact.

67 posted on 03/04/2016 6:23:06 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Maybe so, but only one of us is suggesting side stepping part of our founding document.


68 posted on 03/04/2016 6:26:07 AM PST by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Liz
" Cruz either has the Canadian-issued Consular Report of Birth Abroad, which is his legal proof of US Citizenship, or he doesn't. Would appear his parents never applied for it....making Cruz a bonafide Canadian. "

Eh?

69 posted on 03/04/2016 6:26:16 AM PST by OKSooner (Burn it down. Burn it to the ground and punish the guilty, then figure out what to do next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
Maybe so, but only one of us is suggesting side stepping part of our founding document.

And only one of us is claiming to know what the Founders are thinking right now.

70 posted on 03/04/2016 6:29:52 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

I believe the founders were quite clear, and I believe they thought they were being quite clear.

As you stated earlier... Divided loyalties and you are correct.


71 posted on 03/04/2016 6:37:08 AM PST by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: exit82
You OBVIOUSLY BELIEVE that the SAME LAW that APPLIES TO TED CRUZ,
DOES NOT APPLY TO Donald "EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE USE" Trump. .

I ask you DIRECTLY: When it comes to TED CRUZ the LAW IS VERY CLEAR. So there is the law for the time Ted Cruz was born,
AND HOW Ted Cruz's PARENTS fulfilled ALL those requirements of the law that time, for Ted Cruz to be a "Natural Born Citizen".
Ted Cruz did NOT NEED a Court and a Judge to "Nationalize" him.
72 posted on 03/04/2016 6:39:12 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
What's total B..S. is your retort.

The LAW IS CLEAR, and I LINKED TO IT through MANY, MANY SOURCES.
But YOU, LIKE ALL OF Donald "EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE USE" Trump's SUPPORTERS, CAN NOT HANDLE THE TRUTH !
73 posted on 03/04/2016 6:39:12 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
As you stated earlier... Divided loyalties and you are correct.

Other than circumstances of birth that he had no control over, what reason do you have to believe that Ted Cruz feels any loyalty all to any country other than the United States?

74 posted on 03/04/2016 6:42:11 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears
Ah, yes. Broward County. Where DemocRATS are to too stupid to vote properly

:-)

75 posted on 03/04/2016 6:45:10 AM PST by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Does not matter. His birth is enough to automatically disqualify him. You are correct in that he had no control over it but that does not matter.

Your could have the best candidate ever, with a love if America so deep that it hurt, but if you cannot satisfy the NBC clause you cannot be president, no matter how great you may be.

At birth Cruz, Rubio, Obama all had divided loyalties. None are qualified.


76 posted on 03/04/2016 6:46:49 AM PST by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Touche.

I do my best editing after I hit enter.


77 posted on 03/04/2016 6:49:45 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
I believe their intent was to try and prevent someone with divided loyalties from becoming President. If it's going to allow someone like Hillary and disallow someone like Cruz then we've fallen into the trap of letting the letter of the law violate the intent.

The law isn't in place to define a qualitative difference between individuals like the one you cite between Cruz and Hillary. That's for the voters, or in the more Constitutional sense, for the States to determine.

The law is what it is to prevent a precedent that would allow any old Jose, or Vladimir, or Hu - uh, Abdul - yeah, that's the ticket, any old Abdul who was NOT born on American soil nor to an American father, but who can claim an American mom, from being elected President.

Like you say, divided or conflicting loyalties in the best case, or the possibility of outright hostility.

But that could never happen... /s

78 posted on 03/04/2016 6:50:53 AM PST by OKSooner (Burn it down. Burn it to the ground and punish the guilty, then figure out what to do next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Re-post:

" I believe their intent was to try and prevent someone with divided loyalties from becoming President. If it's going to allow someone like Hillary and disallow someone like Cruz then we've fallen into the trap of letting the letter of the law violate the intent. "

The law isn't in place to define a qualitative difference between individuals like the one you cite between Cruz and Hillary. That's for the voters, or in the more Constitutional sense, for the States to determine.

The law is what it is to prevent a precedent that would allow any old Jose, or Vladimir, or Hu - uh, Abdul - yeah, that's the ticket, any old Abdul who was NOT born on American soil nor to an American father, but who can claim an American mom, from being elected President.

Like you say, divided or conflicting loyalties in the best case, or the possibility of outright hostility.

But that could never happen... /s

79 posted on 03/04/2016 6:52:00 AM PST by OKSooner (Burn it down. Burn it to the ground and punish the guilty, then figure out what to do next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
That depends on whether you take an originalist or textualist view of the Constitution.

To an originalist, what matters is intent. To a textualist, all that matters is the words.

80 posted on 03/04/2016 6:53:13 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson