Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: Christie Endorsement Is GOPe's Signal that They Had Better Think About Trump As The Future
Twitter ^ | 2.26.16

Posted on 02/26/2016 11:35:07 AM PST by drewh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Folks, if you're reading this, you know what needs to happen.
It doesn't take a big contribution. Pick your comfort level and
please join others to help put the FReepathon to rest. Thank you.

61 posted on 02/26/2016 12:21:11 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

or.....so does looking through the wrong end of the binoculars!

same result!


62 posted on 02/26/2016 12:21:11 PM PST by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Newt would have been one of America’s best POTUS, but now it’s too late - he’s too old for veep position.


63 posted on 02/26/2016 12:22:05 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

And what’s the alternative, huh?

Amnesty-Rubio and his new bestest buddy Cruz?

The mask came off last night after the debate.


64 posted on 02/26/2016 12:22:12 PM PST by Luircin (The difference between lesser evil and greater good is who gets schlonged in the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

One big thing Newt has going against him is his age. Trump needs a young man to carry on the hard work of repairing the nation.


65 posted on 02/26/2016 12:22:46 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Rubio: All the slipperiness of Bill Clinton, with none of the smarts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

I am sticking with the guy who has a solid proven record of defending the Constitution.


66 posted on 02/26/2016 12:23:40 PM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

So fat fingers say what?


67 posted on 02/26/2016 12:23:46 PM PST by Safetgiver (Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

HA.

You’re claiming this last night after your boy Cruzie got all buddy-buddy with mister Gang-of-Eight himself? And you seriously think that he’s anti-amnesty?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Boy, did he pull the wool over YOUR eyes!


68 posted on 02/26/2016 12:25:53 PM PST by Luircin (The difference between lesser evil and greater good is who gets schlonged in the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Would you be happy with George Washington,Old Sport? Ain’t no one alive could make you happy.


69 posted on 02/26/2016 12:26:55 PM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Luircin
I have never once endorsed Cruz. Go find where I did, because I didn't.

However Cruz and Rubio are still better than Trump, Corey, and his weaponized amnesty.

70 posted on 02/26/2016 12:27:19 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

Wow, that’s the best you have now?

HA!

HAHA!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Point and laugh!


71 posted on 02/26/2016 12:28:16 PM PST by Luircin (The difference between lesser evil and greater good is who gets schlonged in the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

CRUZ?

He has a solid proven record of posturing, strutting, running for President the instant he got into the Senate, and then stabbing us in the back, you mean.

And you still support him? Well, too bad; he’s already lost!

HAHAHAHAHAHA!


72 posted on 02/26/2016 12:30:13 PM PST by Luircin (The difference between lesser evil and greater good is who gets schlonged in the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

Not at all. I don’t expect anyone to be perfect. But how many times do you have to be backstabbed before you are done with it? Do you have battered spouse syndrome or something?


73 posted on 02/26/2016 12:30:58 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hah. Okay, so you’re not endorsing Cruz, eh? Who you going for?

If it’s Carson I can respect that.

If it’s any of the other also-rans, I’m going to laugh at you all the harder.


74 posted on 02/26/2016 12:31:27 PM PST by Luircin (The difference between lesser evil and greater good is who gets schlonged in the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Baldwin77

I like your cabinet selections.


75 posted on 02/26/2016 12:33:56 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

Carson would be fine. But I’d take any of the 17 Republicans who ran over Trump. None of his so-called ‘conservative’ positions were before a campaign adviser told him he needed them to run as a Republican. He’s untrustworthy, and he’s liberal socialist Democrat. He has no loyalty to us or this country. He’s to the left of Hillary and Sanders on some issues.


76 posted on 02/26/2016 12:34:57 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Luircin
Yeah - it's good to laugh - Jimmy Kimmel: Poorly Educated for Trump
77 posted on 02/26/2016 12:36:04 PM PST by Heartlander (Prediction: Increasingly, logic will be seen as a covert form of theism. - Denyse O'Leary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: j.argese

Trump did call ot to Palin today. He hasn’t forgotten her.


78 posted on 02/26/2016 12:42:31 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grania

Regardless of whether the Senate Republicans have the minimal balls necessary to block Obama’s replacement for Scalia, there are still three Justices left on the Court who are over the age of 80.

The next President will determine the direction of the Supreme Court for the next 30 years. Either we are going to have a far left-wing oligarchy legislating from the bench for another generation, or we will not.

Do you really want a moderate to liberal President who will pick moderate to liberal Supreme Court Justices?


79 posted on 02/26/2016 12:42:35 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: onona

what I can see is the benefit of having someone with experience promoting a legislative agenda.

newt’s contract with America was the last time we balanced the budget...of course Clinton took credit for it, but newt got it done.

I think that shows a glimmer of fiscal responsibility to the potential ticket.

I’m buyin.


80 posted on 02/26/2016 12:42:56 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson