Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The South Carolina primary results don't mean Trump will be the nominee
The Brookings Institute ^ | February 20, 2016 | John Hudak

Posted on 02/20/2016 8:55:29 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-292 next last
To: The Toll
For the Left, Winter is Coming .

That is tag line material right there.
41 posted on 02/20/2016 9:06:57 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Trump isn’t a serious candidate.


42 posted on 02/20/2016 9:06:58 PM PST by Rebelbase (Best election ever. Sick of it already, but best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The only candidates that can stop Trump from the nomination now is Cruz and Rubio.

Cruz did not win a single county or delegate in SC tonight. His performance was an utter disaster. His much ballyhooed "ground game" got no traction whatsoever. This was a state heavy with the "evangelicals" that was to have been Cruz's to lose. Cruz underperformed badly. Huge disappointment.

Rubio may have won a county or two but will likely have zero delegates to show for it.

Trump will likely landslide Nevada Tuesday night and add another 30 delegates to his total.

Then we have Super Tuesday on March 1. Other than Texas, Trump should cruise. He could easily pick up 600 delegates that night - even if he doesn't win Texas.

Barring disaster, Trump will be our nominee and our next president. I don't believe there is any example where somebody won NH and SC and did not also win the nomination.

43 posted on 02/20/2016 9:07:07 PM PST by SamAdams76 (Delegates So Far: Trump (61); Cruz (11); Rubio (10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Pure Brookings gobbledegook.

A thousand words to say a lot of nothing.

Is Trump assured of the nomination? Of course not.

Brookings primates need not blow strings upon strings of garbled polispeak to get that point across.


44 posted on 02/20/2016 9:07:10 PM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
No one has been the republican nominee without winning SC.

What about Romney?
45 posted on 02/20/2016 9:07:55 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: QuinqueViae

1980: Ronald Reagan won with 55%, defeating runner-up John Connally.
1984: Uncontested (Reagan was the incumbent president and was re-nominated).
1988: George H. W. Bush won with 49%, defeating runner-up Bob Dole.
1992: George H. W. Bush won with 67%, defeating runner-up Pat Buchanan.
1996: Bob Dole won with 45%, defeating runner-up Pat Buchanan.
2000: George W. Bush won with 53%, defeating runner-up John McCain.
2004: Uncontested (Bush was the incumbent president and was re-nominated).
2008: John McCain won with 33%, defeating runner-up Mike Huckabee.
2012: Newt Gingrich won with 40%, defeating runner-up Mitt Romney.
2016: Donald Trump won with 33%, defeating runner-up Marco Rubio.

What do we see here?


46 posted on 02/20/2016 9:08:26 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Comments?"

Will my laughter suffice ?

47 posted on 02/20/2016 9:08:41 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Denial is the first stage.


48 posted on 02/20/2016 9:09:19 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Go out and make your fortune if you feel that way. It’s yours for the taking.


49 posted on 02/20/2016 9:09:53 PM PST by I Hired Craig Livingstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Today’s primary belies this analysis.

Trump got 33% but in the proportional allocation gets at least 88% of the delegates.


50 posted on 02/20/2016 9:09:58 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

GOPe has got to be getting worried about now.


51 posted on 02/20/2016 9:10:31 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76; null and void

We’ll see what disasters Barry Dunham will bring by November.

Well, I AM on the nut-job conspiracy ping list, so.......


52 posted on 02/20/2016 9:10:34 PM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well of course SC does not mean Trump will be the nominee but it gives him a good head of steam going into NV on Tuesday where he’s going to win big and we all know it.

Then March 1st is the SEC. So Trump blows into the SEC with 3 wins under his belt and a possible endorsement from Jeff Sessions of Alabama. After the SEC its going to be hard to keep arguing that Trump is not going to win.


53 posted on 02/20/2016 9:11:33 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

The thrust of this article is that many states have proportional delegates. If Rubio and Cruz hang in there and make it 3-person race for the long run then they may be able to make it tough for Trump to ‘clinch’ nomination. Then it goes go the convention and possible super delegates and the GOP Establishment using power play to pick most likely Rubio in the smoke fill rooms even though Trump would have a plurality of delegates. Right there is where chaos will reign. A most likely GOP Presidential win in 2016 will turn into a loss as conservative voters, even those that don’t like Trump will be outrage and refuse to vote or protest vehemently


54 posted on 02/20/2016 9:11:33 PM PST by Bigtigermike (D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I Hired Craig Livingstone

It is strictly against the law for U.S. citizens to bet on elections. Do you live elsewhere?


55 posted on 02/20/2016 9:11:57 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

There’s a tower in Las Vegas that has huge letters at the top which spell TRUMP. He employs hundreds of people there. He has the momentum now. It’s over.


56 posted on 02/20/2016 9:11:59 PM PST by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: QuinqueViae

But the South Carolina primary started in 1980, its not like it has gone back 100 years like the New Hampshire primary has. It will be over within 30 days.


57 posted on 02/20/2016 9:12:46 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“This is not a post to bash Donald Trump.”

When a man says, “It’s not the money, it’s the principle of the thing.” you can be damned sure it’s the money.


58 posted on 02/20/2016 9:12:50 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
No I don't. And even if I did, you ain't the owner, so what's it to you?

Actually, I could be considered a stock holder for multiple reasons. And as such, I demand that you make a monthly contribution to cover your waste of bandwidth.

And stop using all those damned punctuations, I'm tire of cleaning it up!
59 posted on 02/20/2016 9:13:06 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2015/1008/Why-is-it-now-legal-to-gamble-on-the-2016-elections


60 posted on 02/20/2016 9:13:53 PM PST by I Hired Craig Livingstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson