Is Bill Clinton in the FBI crosshairs too? -- Hillary may have implicated her husband

Washington Times ^ | February 3, 2016 | Monica Crowley

[WENDLE]

Well you are half right. I assure you that it is a fact issue for a jury if Bill spoke for $1 million for 45 minutes and his wife 10 days later went against obama and “approved “ the state department’s certification of the keystone pipeline. I want to see all the other evidence. Let the Jury decide.

[nascarnation]

There is a body of thought that Hillary can pardon herself after taking office in Jan 2017, saving the huge bribe to the Chicago Mob for a POTUS pardon.

Obviously she could pardon BJ and Chels also.

Her only jeopardy would be impeachment and conviction by Congress, but it’s unlikely they would have enough b@lls to do it. The MSM would say that violates the “will of the people” who elected her.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

They are both loose cannons at best. But then, about whom among Democrat presidential nominees since Kennedy (at least) was that not true???

[fella]

Just type in; Plunkett of Tammy Hall pdf

And you’ll find a bunch of free downloads.

[WENDLE]

Cool . TNX

[VideoDoctor]

Never happen

I would tend to agree.. unless they outlive their usefulness to the powers that be.

[DrDude]

What is your take on the speeches made by Bill(& Hill). Hillary offered to release transcripts of the speeches. Now she says NO. It is on Drudge. My take is the Clintons are so bold they may not have made many of these speeches. They could have been paid off directly. Either way it is a crime for which many have been charged.

[Liz]

Mmmmm....your are good points to ponder. I believe the humongous honoraria the connivers received were money-laundering/tax evasion scams.......maybe collusion, conspiracy, electronic fraud, accounting fraud, and the like.

When Orgy Island pedophile Epstein's records were examined....L/E found Clinton listed w/ some 25 email addresses and tele nos.

L/E recognizes multiple tele nos as money laundering/tax evasion Modus operandi.

=============================================

The Bank Secrecy Act should be mobilized----to follow the paper trail and determine how monies changed hands; to determine the scope and dimension of collusion in sub rosa deals and who might be personally profiting.

<><> L/E needs to examine G/S and the Clinton Foundation bank accounts.

<><> Joint bank accounts might be used to facilitate the transfer of funds from one account to another, and/or wire-transferred offshore;

<><> To cover their tracks, fake invoices might be created to show that money deposited into accounts was being used for legitimate purposes.

<><> Financial schemes scheme might be advanced by issuing phony statements of payments from financial sources that actually covered the transfer of funds for insiders' personal use and/or for redistribution schemes.