Posted on 02/04/2016 10:23:44 AM PST by LS
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/bombshell-report-marco-rubios-gay-scandal-surfaces/
here is a link, but I’m not sure how correct the source is, which is why I didn’t post it. But yesterday on one of the forums here there was some talk about a “sex scandal” and some madam had a name she would release that would have an effect on the election. I assume this is what she was talking about but could be wrong.
“If NH comes in with anyone other than Trump at the top the entire races optics open up”
Who’s second to Trump that is eligible?
If we had a fair and sane press that should narrow the ‘optics’
Well, lots of us had hopes Cruz would be the stabilizing tail on a Trump kite. So much for that.
This.
Attend just one Iowa caucus and you can get a free lesson on how intimidation and public shaming works.
There are reasons why nobody should let Iowa be the bellwether for anything, and there are also reasons why the political machines maintain Iowa's first-in-the-nation caucus status. Once again, only if you look at it as being part of a political con job rather than the preservation of some mythical quaint tradition, it all makes sense.
It sure ain't because politicians just love Iowa(ns) in February.
Mr. niteowl77
Drudge is sitting on a Cruz ‘bombshell’, as is Breitbart. It’s about to get real interesting, if all parties decide to go there, although a blogger will have to break everything since the MenSeekingMen won’t. Only Q is does it happen before NH.
Don’t forget, Trump owns lots of hotels, and probably also has some juice to splash with.
That might be the reason there was a fake mistress story released recently about Rubio. Throw doubt over there about him being a womanizer so people won’t look closer over here at his arrest at a gay cruising park. Sheesh been to many closet homos on pubbie side for my comfort.
I have read about that, but is there a good, reliable source that reports on this? I don’t want to accuse him of that if it isn’t true, but if it is, I would really like to know.
Carson could be fishing for a position?
No. I don’t vote lesser of two evils anymore. I will write in Ted Cruz.
Thanks. Interesting but not conclusive.
According to the article, police report does not mention details other than being in the park after closing.
More facts are needed.
Then he’s even worse than I was thinking he was.
Yeah, That’s what I thought, hence why i didn’t post it. I do think it gives one pause, especially with all the scandal rumors floating around at this time.
Probably the most profound post of the day. Although some technically are qualified, nobody is very good. Out of millions of Americans, this is the best we could come up with? Really?
Thanks...
For the arrest..I got it from Jim Noble..thanks.
Obama was a complete do-nothing during his six years in the Illinois legilsature, accomplishing nothing and missing huge numbers of votes. One he got elected, he did nothing.
Rubio spent more than a decade in state government, rising from City Commissioner, to state representative, to Majority leader, until being elected Speaker by his fellow Republicans. Unlike Obama, he actually excelled at that level of government. Cut taxes, fought eminent domain, and according to the Democratic House leader was an "extreme right" conservative but one who was willing to work on legislation and not "be a jerk"/about it. He left office only because he was term limited out.
Like Cruz and Oba, Rubio only has one Senate term. But unlike Obama, he against actually did something. Probably the biggest thing he accomplished - and it's usually hard for junior Senator to do much, but - was to dig into the Affordable Care Act. He figured out that the government might try to use the " risk corridors" to bail out insurance companies that were losing money, and he drafted legislation to ensure that federal funds couldn't be used for that.
It was diabolically clever, because Rubio foresaw that the original funding plan - which had profitable insurers bailing out unprofitable ones - would probably not raise enough money. He wanted to amend the law to prevent dipping into other federal revenues. Dems thought the original plan would raise enough money, and didn't want to be accused of sending tax dollars to insurance companies. So, both Congressional Democrats and Obama they signed off on his legislation.
Rubio turned out to be right, and the inability of the feds to use tax dollars to bail out insurance companies (because of Rubio's legislation) is accelerating the death spiral.
That's really the only effective blow that has been struck against Obamacare by anyone in Congress.
Polls are for fools.
Exactly. What do we know?
We know that who wins the Iowa caucus rarely wins the nomination right?
We know the media is just a criminal all around. THey lie to us more than tell the truth.
so, the polls have to be skewed. Remember 2012 elections I was shocked Zero got re-elected. Now we know the reports of employment numbers and the economy, were lies to re-elect the puke. Oh and Benghazi was put on hold. OUTRAGEOUS.
Polls......UGH!
Indeed.
Cheers.
When it comes to “moral” candidates, I think we’re all concerned about the big things, abortion, adultery, marriage, not about “campaign ethics” if there is such a thing. We’re concerned about honesty in keeping campaign promises, and Cruz has already proven that he’s done that in his Senate career. When people talk about looking for an ethical, trustworthy candidate, the type of campaign mailers or phone calls someone makes are not even on the radar. This is super small ball, only being hyped up by Cruz haters, of whom there are many thanks to Team Trump and Team RINO (Fox, etc.).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
