Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz victory threatens ethanol's power
The Hill ^ | 02/02/16 | Devin Henry

Posted on 02/03/2016 5:29:35 AM PST by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2016 5:29:35 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

‘Cruz victory threatens ethanol’s power’

They say that like it’s a bad thing. Let ethanol stand without govt crutches, if it can.


2 posted on 02/03/2016 5:36:04 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I, for one, want ethanol OUT of my gasoline. It damages engines. To protect them, you have to buy additives, which adds to the price of fuel.


3 posted on 02/03/2016 5:37:32 AM PST by FrankR (You're only enslaved to the extent of the charity that you receive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Once an industry or state gets on federal welfare, it’s like breaking a heroin habit. Ethanol dirties the environment, damages engines and has no benefit except buying votes for politicians.


4 posted on 02/03/2016 5:38:33 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Ethanol backers, however, say the meaning of the caucus results are being overhyped into a "false victory" for "Big Oil."

I don't see it so much as a victory for "Big Oil" as a victory for small engines.

If the market wants ethanol, there will be a market for ethanol. The mandate is as damaging and unnecessary as the agency to oversee it.

5 posted on 02/03/2016 5:38:39 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Ethanol from corn for gasoline is stupid.

Ethanol has killed more small engines that Cash for Clunkers.


6 posted on 02/03/2016 5:38:49 AM PST by hadaclueonce (I thought Ethanol was the devil, now i find it is America is an Oligarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“This was not about Ted Cruz, and it was never about Ted Cruz. It was about moving everyone — and also, Ted Cruz moved,” said Eric Branstad, the state director of pro-ethanol group America’s Renewable Future and Terry Branstad’s son. “

Stick it up your crony, Eric.


7 posted on 02/03/2016 5:40:21 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Correct. Cruz isn’t threatening ethanol. He is threatening ethanol subsidies...ALL subsidies on energy, in fact. Let the free market decide what is best. Open things up so vehicles that use e-25, etc. can be made or imported to the USA. The corn farmers who depend on Gubmint subsidies will be glad that Cruz is president. They’ll be able to increase their business by quite a lot.


8 posted on 02/03/2016 5:46:57 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Why do we give our hearts to the past? And why must we grow up so fast?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I am a Trump supporter, but I salute Cruz for taking his principled stand


9 posted on 02/03/2016 6:00:09 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Ethanol can still thrive. . . . In the private sector and not on the backs of the taxpayer.


10 posted on 02/03/2016 6:02:25 AM PST by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Hog and beef farmers will be thankful for less expensive feed. It may be the deciding factor in saving their farm.


11 posted on 02/03/2016 6:08:53 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

If the only thing Cruz ever accomplishes is the ultimate death of the Ethanol Teat Suckers, his candidacy will have been well worthwhile.


12 posted on 02/03/2016 6:10:25 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Populism is what Populism does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Last time I checked Cruz won’t have a line-item veto.

Ain’t enough votes in Congress to repeal Obamacare or impeach Obama. But overriding a Cruz veto on ethanol....that they can get done.


13 posted on 02/03/2016 6:12:23 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Let’s not forget, 10% ethanol in your gasoline results in a 10% reduction in fuel mileage. We’re still burning the same amount of petroleum, just subsidizing the ethanol industry and corn growers. Welfare, by another name.
I wonder who are the big ethanol investors?


14 posted on 02/03/2016 6:14:51 AM PST by Fireone (The future must belong to those who tell the truth about Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

It should threaten Iowa’s first in the nation status as well. We cannot afford to be blackmailed by the ethanol lobby every four years.


15 posted on 02/03/2016 6:23:25 AM PST by CPT Clay (Hillary: Julius and Ethal Rosenberg were electrocuted for selling classified info.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
I am a Trump supporter, but I salute Cruz for taking his principled stand

Principled? He is backed by big oil, he had no choice. Typical weasel politician.
16 posted on 02/03/2016 6:24:05 AM PST by hey Bean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney

As it should.

That stuff is ruinous to fuel systems and engines and is completely unnecessary.

I wonder if Trump would have won Iowa if he had come out against it?

Seemed like the natural position for him to take, but he didn’t.


17 posted on 02/03/2016 6:43:05 AM PST by lifeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fireone

“I wonder who are the big ethanol investors?”

http://farmindustrynews.com/ethanol/5-largest-ethanol-producers

These are just a few makers.

The other big beneficiaries are the corn famers who are mostly large-scale commercial enterprises, not your mom and pop farmers.

http://www.nffc.net/Learn/Fact%20Sheets/King%20Corn%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf


18 posted on 02/03/2016 6:43:14 AM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hey Bean

“He is backed by big oil,”

He is backed by free enterprise Americans like me.

Exactly who is the ‘big oil’ you are referring to?

Do you even realize that the proverbial ‘Seven Sisters’ of old literature has been whittled down to a paltry 4 now? These 4 control a minority of the petroleum activity in this country or elsewhere.

‘Big Oil’ hearkens back to a time prior to OPEC. It is no longer. The only ‘big oil’ around anymore is the oil-producing countries of the world, not oil companies, who practice monopolistic practices to manipulate world supply and oil price.

And OPEC thank God is getting throttled badly as it has lost control of the market due to the innovation of oil companies, including big oil companies, that produce the oil and gas we use in this country.

Your anger is misplaced, friend.


19 posted on 02/03/2016 6:51:40 AM PST by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ryderann

“Hog and beef farmers will be thankful for less expensive feed. It may be the deciding factor in saving their farm.”

Food prices, especially staples like bacon, rib-eyes and corn whiskey should go down as the use of corn ethanol declines.


20 posted on 02/03/2016 7:56:14 AM PST by duffee (CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson