| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 01/18/2016 1:36:38 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 01/18/2016 1:09:41 PM PST by Theo
The conservative apologists for Donald Trump, and sadly there are some, protest that using his 1999 interview with the late Tim Russert, in which Trump vividly and unabashedly lays out his New York City liberalism, isn't fair game given the time elapsed since then.
Fair enough. Being that it was sixteen years ago, and even in another century and all, perhaps they have a point? We have to leave room for human beings to evolve, right? Do all of us believe all of the same things we believed sixteen years ago? I mean this was so long ago that Trump hadn't yet launched his disastrous presidential run for Ross Perot's Reform Party.
So let's make like the bankruptcy laws Trump readily admits he uses to his advantage, and cut a billionaire some slack. How about 2010? Is that too far back? What about, oh, I don't know ... 2015?
The truth is you don't have to go way back to find that Trump always has been, and remains to this day, a typical New York City liberal. This explains why Trump so often engages in liberal tactics like victim blaming, blame-shifting, demagoguery, dishonesty, etc. And he does so usually through the exact same liberal media other liberals use. But don't just take my word for it. Here's Trump in his own words:
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview where he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when Trump joined Bernie Sanders in advocating for a taxpayer-funded, single-payer healthcare system in 2015?
Sourced here.
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview in which he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when the baby-killers at Planned Parenthood named Trump their "favorite Republican" in 2015?
Sourced here.
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview where he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when Trump failed to support religious liberty in 2015? Sourced here.
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview where he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when Trump said he wouldn't tear up Obama's Faustian Bargain with Iran back in 2015?
Sourced here.
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview where he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when Trump sounded like an anti-Israel liberal (claiming Israel may not want peace and will have to give up even more to Islamists) in 2015?
Sourced here and here.
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview where he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when Trump came out for a 45% tariff on imported Chinese goods in 2015 (and then lied about it in last week's GOP debate)?
Sourced here.
By the way, polls show middle and lower-middle class Americans are most likely to support Trump. They would be the ones most devastated by Trump's tariff scheme, because the higher cost of goods they buy at big box stores like Wal-Mart and Target would be passed on to them.
But I digress.
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview where he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when Trump donated $50,000 to Obamaista Rahm "never let a good crisis go to waste" Emanuel in 2010?
Sourced here.
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview where he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when despite all his tough immigration talk, Trump came out for amnesty in 2015?
Sourced here.
If you think using Trump's 1999 interview where he admits his liberalism is unfair because it's too long ago, how about when Trump used his pro-baby killing sister as an example of the type of Supreme Court justices he'd appoint in 2015?
Sourced here.
Here's the bottom line -- there's not a single issue on which Trump is a credible conservative.
Not. A. Single. One.
Trump was a typical New York City liberal back in 1999, and he's still a typical New York City liberal now. That's why Trump's campaign has empty platitudes instead of substance, and has to resort to the same smear tactics as the Left - because Trump can't win a real debate on the issues.
So why are some conservatives still defending this typical New York City liberal?
Not. A. Single. One.
Sources in the original post.
Levin has gone full Cruz. Wonder how he will be regarded during the Trump years?
Even if it is true, he will build the wall. If the wall isnt built soon, these petty political arguments will be the least of our worries.
Levin didn’t write this. Steve Deace wrote this. Yes, Steve Deace has endorsed Ted Cruz.
Build a wall, enforce the law, deport them all. End anchor babies. End sanctuary cities. Slap a moratorium on Muslim invasion, er, immigration. Investigate the mosques. Secure the borders, secure the nation.
Cut the taxes, cut the spending, cut the regulations, cut the government. Strengthen the economy, bring back the jobs.
Rebuild the military.
Buck the media, buck the GOPe.
Sounds pretty conservative to me.
Right you are.
As a conservative and a constitutionalist.
Yes, not only the geographical wall but the economic wall.
Some people seem to have no clue how to prioritize.
Either way, we win, they lose.
God bless America.
Search is a great tool.
This same article was posted two hours ago.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3385249/posts
Thanks. Some of this anti-trump stuff is going way over the top.
At this point, it doesn’t even surprise me anymore when we see the same damn thread posted and reposted. This is at least the second time, but probably it’s been posted even more than twice.
If this thread gets deleted, Jim’s comments will be gone too..
Levin is the head honcho there
Secure the country first, then deal with the other issues of the day.
“never let a good crisis go to waste”
That reminds me of something.
“My concern is that the negligence of a few will adversely affect the majority. I’ve long been a believer in the “look at the solution, not the problem” theory. In this case, the solution is clear. We will have to leave borders behind and go for global unity when it comes to financial stability.”
“You ask about Europe in crisis as an opportunity for investment. I see the world in crisis at the moment. I’m a firm believer that there are always opportunities whether the markets or up or down, but it requires insight and sometimes creativity to see those opportunities. I have no doubt that the balance we need will be achieved, but it won’t happen overnight.”
Heidi Cruz wrote that in 2013. Oh wait. It wasn’t Heidi Cruz or Goldman Sachs either.
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/01/22/business/opinion-donald-trump-europe/
I will never vote for a sneaky Canadian carpetbagger poser for the U.S. president. If Cruz is the Republican candidate, I will sit out the election.
Exactly. I’ve heard people say they won’t vote for him because he’s been married 3 times. Remember how Gingrich got slammed because of the same thing? So we ended up with Romney and here we are. Desperate times call for desperate measures. Nobody else will give us a wall. I believe God will use Donald Trump and has a plan.
He’s deceptive on virtually every other issue, yet you believe him when it comes to the wall. Interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.