Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier; Crazieman

I’m curious how many other governors will join in. Each state already has a number of its own laws that infringe gun rights.

But to put this in perspective, [just a hypothetical] machine guns are technically ‘arms’ born to defend citizens against tyranny. Yet, I am glad that machine guns are highly regulated. And so are most US citizens glad that machine guns are highly regulated.

Which means?

Progressives have perverted constitutional interpretation.

Progressives trained congress to legislate constitutional amendments. They thought that amendments were too much of a hassle. It was an easy shortcut, and now we have anarchy.


15 posted on 01/03/2016 3:25:49 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (The DNC 2012 Convention actually booed God three times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur Wildfire! March

The second amendment, interpreted properly, means Joe Schmoe can have an Abrams in his garage.


21 posted on 01/03/2016 3:36:36 AM PST by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

So far there has been one murder with an NFA full auto weapon. Pretty low number for the number of full auto weapons out there.

It’s not a problem and the regulation of these weapons should end.


77 posted on 01/03/2016 10:21:40 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Look closely at any evil and most times you'll find the unmistakable handprint of caesar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

“Yet, I am glad that machine guns are highly regulated. And so are most US citizens glad that machine guns are highly regulated.”

I’m not glad at all.

L


80 posted on 01/03/2016 10:32:49 AM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

“Progressives” know full well there are already copious laws against guns, racism, despoiling the environment, all their “causes.” They just make believe there aren’t so they can keep the agitation going.

They’ve been trying since Obama was inaugurated to turn the clock back to the ‘60s and ‘70s, as if nothing had happened in the interim. The “why” is obvious, the “grievance industry” had fallen on hard times, and all those in that line of work wanted their fat paydays back. Agitating and roiling up the country is the way they make their bucks.

They’re shameless and evil.


83 posted on 01/03/2016 10:51:10 AM PST by JennysCool (My hyprocrisy goes only so far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

I’m not glad the NFA was passed, and I’m not happy about the Hughes Amendment.


85 posted on 01/03/2016 10:56:00 AM PST by wastedyears (uchikudake - toki michite - ikiru tame - tokihanate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

The argument for regulating full automatic weapons is as void as is the argument for regulating any other small arms. Free, law-abiding people should not be prevented from owning small arms.

Israel and Switzerland do not restrict people from owning full-automatic weapons and they’re doing fine.


123 posted on 01/04/2016 10:35:16 AM PST by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Yet, I am glad that machine guns are highly regulated.

Speak for yourself. Do not presume to speak for others.

I am outraged and disgusted that standard military arms are "highly regulated", as you so delicately put it.

It is long past time to

1) Repeal the National Firearms Act.
2) Repeal the Gun Control Act.
3) Repeal the Hughes Amendment.

A Supreme Court that was not compromised and disloyal to the Constitution would long since have struck down these unconstitutional acts of Congress. A Congress that was not compromised and disloyal to the Constitution would long since have repealed them. A President that was not compromised and disloyal to the Constitution would long since have refused to enforce them.

"... shall not be infringed."

It's not rocket science.

168 posted on 01/25/2016 8:02:35 PM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson