Posted on 12/30/2015 5:04:47 PM PST by Hojczyk
Maybe so, but see post 16.
USFRIENDINVICTORIA nails it.
Here is a better list:
Shame on you. A 19 year old girl against a 50 year old man who happens to be her Boss and you call the 19 year old a “predator”?
I pretty much agree that Lewinsky isn’t a huge issue, except that presidents having sex with women not their wives in the White House is ultra smarmy. She wasn’t a child.
Nothing in 2016 can be about Lewinsky; it has to be about the others who were raped or nearly raped, or the children the pig raped on “Orgy Island”. Hillary is in the know, and always has been, so she’s complicit.
There was no sexual harassment in the Lewinsky affair. She had the hots for him and it was completely consensual. He acted like a jackass, abused his position and his office, but Lewinsky was completely compliant.
If she had been a student and he was a professor, that would have been moral turpitude. He’s still an idiot.
Well....another Clinton apologetic groupie rears it’s head!!
If that is not a breach of Office....I don't know what is.
Except she was not 19 years old. She was born mid 1973 and was in the White House 1995 and 1996, so she was 22 and 23. She also apparently had a 5 year affair with her coach, and was a college graduate. And what about snapping her thong at Clinton before the other stuff started?
Riiiiight. And if you claim that the sun rises in the east you'll need to consult a panel of UN scientists to be sure of it.
Saw this list on facebook...a bit longer than in the article...........
* Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
*Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
*Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
*Regina Hopper Blakely - “forced himself on her, biting, bruising her”
*Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
*Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
*22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
*Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
*Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
*Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
*Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
*1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
*1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
*Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
*Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
*Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
*Sally Perdue - post incident threats
*Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
*Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
So did Monica rape/molest all those other women too?
Yeah,I was going to say say I don’t think Grace was consensual.
The American people sadly believe Mrs. Bill, not Mrs. Broaddrick.
If Monica’s book is to be believed . . she bragged to her friends that she was ‘packing her Presidential knee pads’ when she was leaving for her internship. Doesn’t excuse Bill, especially since Monica was so much younger than he.
First of all you have to ask yourself the question “Why is the Washington Post helping us here”? Bill Clinton’s affairs, rapes & sexual harassments aren’t the issue. Hillary’s defense, obfuscation, denigration etc. are the issue. Those are the issues that need to be brought to light. Don’t let the MSM determine the dialogue.
It's the extreme power differential that matters, as you well know. Why are you trying to defend Bill Clinton? Monica was one of the absolute nadirs in the history of the American presidency. What is your goal?
Not arguing that Clinton was not a complete jerk, oaf, jackass, ..., you get the picture. When the Republicans “closed the government” Clinton went looking for some pizza in the White House secretarial pool, where Lewinsky snapped her thong at him. With Clinton exhibiting about as much discretion as gnat in heat, next thing ya know, Ol’ B.J. is getting his eponym from the eponymous Miss Lewinsky.
The following is from the newspaper owned by Ivanka Trump's husband:
It's very clear; the media is covering up everything they possibly can. A lot is in the linked article and the legal eagle lawyer I didn't want to name the other day is named in the article.
In the linked article, read about the flight log. Usually it was Clinton's usual name but once it was different, maybe more.
As I said the other day, in all my reading, I don't recall anyone actually accusing Clinton of a specific liaison on the Virgin Islands. May be afraid to. That's what a lot of it is about so we will never know the true number of women preyed upon.
And someone wrote that Lewinsky was the predator. Fair enough. Some wondered if the MOSSAD put her there. In any case, if she had overtly fondled him and whatever else she is accused of, that still is no excuse for Clinton taking advantage of it in light of the rules in place now about sexual harassment in the workplace. A real man would not have taken the bait and furthermore in a high position should know that he could be entrapped and ruin his career.
The One Free Grope rule?
The Washington Post is attempting to cover this over and make it 'nothing to see here - move on'...
I know this much - IF there were credible rape charges against Trump - and he had used goons to shut the women up - the effing Washington Post would NOT cover it this way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.