Exclusive - Islamic State ruling aims to settle who can have sex with female slaves

Reuters ^ | December 29, 2015 | Jonathan Landay, Warren Strobel, and Phil Stewart

[C19fan]

slamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when "owners" of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.

The ruling or fatwa has the force of law and appears to go beyond the Islamic State's previous known utterances on the subject, a leading Islamic State scholar said. It sheds new light on how the group is trying to reinterpret centuries-old teachings to justify the sexual slavery of women in the swaths of Syria and Iraq it controls.

[C19fan]

/src on/Damn no mother-daughter slave action allowed./src off/

[Buckeye McFrog]

yes, but where does Anthony Kennedy stand on this?

[BenLurkin]

Not to worry. The Baraq administration has taken action

[SteveH]

keyboard spew alert

[Robert A Cook PE]

Darn.

I mean, really. The Muslims argue about how to rape slaves, who can rape slaves and who cannot rape slaves ...

But Hillary and Oboma’s ABCNNBCBS press corpse doesn’t even comment on the “legality” of Islamic terrorists BUYING, SELLING, and HOLDING women as slaves?

But Christians are hate-filled bigots for even mentioning Muslim extremists.

[Theoria]

The new rules

1. It is not permissible for the owner of a female captive to have intercourse with her until after she has had menstrual cycle and becomes clean.
2. If she does not menstruate and is pregnant, he is not allowed to have intercourse with her until after she has given birth.
3. It is not permissible to cause her to abort if she is pregnant.
4. If the owner of a female captive releases her, only he can have intercourse with her and he cannot allow someone else to have intercourse with her.
5. If the owner of a female captive, who has a daughter suitable for intercourse, has sexual relations with the latter, he is not permitted to have intercourse with her mother and she is permanently off limits to him. Should he have intercourse with her mother then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her daughter and she is to be off-limits to him.
6. The owner of two sisters is not allowed to have intercourse with both of them; rather he may only have intercourse with just one. The other sister is to be had by him, if he were to relinquish ownership of the first sister by selling her, giving her away or releasing her.
7. If the female captive is owned by a father, his son cannot have intercourse with her and vice-versa. Moreover, intercourse with his wife’s female captive is also not permissible.
8. If a father had intercourse with his female captive then gave her away or sold her to his son, he is no longer permitted to have intercourse with her.
9. If the female captive becomes pregnant by her owner, he cannot sell her and she is released after his death.
10. If the owner releases his female captive then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her afterwards because she has become free and is no longer his property.
11. If two or more individuals are involved in purchasing a female captive, none of them are permitted to have sex with her because she is part of a joint ownership.
12. It is not permissible to have intercourse with a female captive during her menstrual cycle.
13. It is not permissible top have anal sex with a female captive.
14. The owner of a female captive should show compassion towards her, be kind to her, not humiliate her and not assign her work she is unable to perform.
15. The owner of a female captive should not sell her to an individual whom he knows will treat her badly or do unto her what Allah has forbidden.

[Buckeye McFrog]

3.It is not permissible to cause her to abort if she is pregnant.

ISIS protects unborn life better than the US Supreme Court.

Just let that sink in for a minute.

[ZOOKER]

Uh, don't #4 and #10 conflict with each other?

Not that it matters, really. The slave has no legal standing and can't accuse or testify against her owner, so slave owners can ignore these rules...

[apocalypto]

Sick.

[ImJustAnotherOkie]

It’s about time. The thought keeps me up at night. I only want good honest people to have sex with slaves.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

Intercourse. Nice euphemism for rape.

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

Remember when liberals thought slavery was bad?

[Gay State Conservative]

Whoopie would say that it's not *rape* rape.

[JimRed]

But Hillary and Oboma's ABCNNBCBS press corpse doesn't even comment on the "legality" of Islamic terrorists BUYING, SELLING, and HOLDING women as slaves?

But hey, that's another culture, and no culture is any better than any other... < /libspeak >

[immadashell]

Does this mean the owner doesn’t have to ask the slave for permission to have sex with her?

[AFreeBird]

I’m waiting for the N.A.G.s to chime in before getting all worked up about this.

Ladies? Girls? Yoo-hoo! Anyone home?

[GOPJ]

/src on/Damn no mother-daughter slave action allowed./src off/

According to the IMAM the 'warrior/owner' can have sex with the daughter - THEN the mother but when he starts doing the mother he must stop doing the daughter.

Most of these religious ‘laws’ are designed to keep men from fighting each other over the ‘spoils’... This one about ‘mothers and daughters’ is probably designed to keep the suicide rate down.

[TruthWillWin]

The question is....”Would Bill Clinton hit it?”

[GOPJ]

“ISIS release ‘rape handbook’ to fighters, with 15 sickening new rules revealed”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/isis-release-rape-handbook-fighters-7087004

[apocalypto]

bump