Posted on 12/08/2015 11:34:42 AM PST by SeekAndFind
To quote Vincent Vega, “That’s a bold statement.” It’s a claim that Col. Richard Kemp, commander of British forces in Afghanistan and an observer to the 2014 war in Gaza, defends in this latest video from Prager University. Kemp makes his argument based on two factors — the reason Israel goes to war (self-defense) and its conduct of war when conflict erupts. Despite claims of widespread war crimes and atrocities, Kemp insists that the IDF’s actions saved lives at risk of their own:
After repeated warnings from Israel to stop, the Israeli Air Force finally conducted precision strikes to halt the rocket-fire. And the IDF advanced into Gaza to destroy a network of terror tunnels that Hamas had constructed to attack Israeli communities near the Gaza border.
The IDF took extraordinary measures to give Gaza civilians notice of targeted areas, dropping millions of leaflets, broadcasting radio messages, sending texts and making tens of thousands of phone calls. Let me repeat that. The Israelis called Gazans on their cell phones and told them to leave their residences and move to safety. Never in the history of warfare has an army phoned its enemy and told them where they are going to drop their bombs.
Many IDF missions that could have taken out Hamas military capabilities were aborted to prevent civilian casualties, increasing the risk to Israeli citizens and soldiers.
Kemp compares this to Hamas’ strategy, which deliberately used civilians as shields and as propaganda devices. The reason this strategy works, Kemp argues, is because Hamas knows that Israel wants to avoid civilian casualties:
Hamas deliberately positioned its military assets among the civilian population, hiding weapons in schools and hospitals, and placing rocket launchers alongside apartment buildings, then forced those civilians to stay in areas they knew would be attacked. They also instructed their people to report the lie that every Gazan killed was a civilian, even if they were actually fighters.
And if there were no civilian deaths, Hamas made them up! Numerous Internet sites show Palestinians elaborately staging sniper victims and smashed ambulances, among other phony horrors. It's so common there's even a term for it — Pallywood, as in Palestinian Hollywood.
Ironically, it's the leaders of Hamas themselves who best understand the extraordinary measures the IDF will take to protect innocent civilians. They take full advantage of Israel's decency and adherence to the laws of war.
Kemp concludes with this strong endorsement of the IDF and its practices:
No army takes such risks in order to protect civilians as the Israeli army does. I say this as a professional soldier. I say it because it's true. And people who care about truth should know it.
Later today, Col. Kemp will be my guest on The Ed Morrissey Show, which starts at 4 ET. We’ll discuss his assessment of the IDF, the common allegations made about it, and the difficulties of militaries aligned with Western culture when fighting those which aren’t. Be sure to tune in.
Setting to one side Sabra and Shatila, 1982.
Lebanese Falangists. The Muslims had murdered many of their people. Look up the Christian Lebanese village of Damour and read about the events that occurred there.
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
The slaughter at Sabra and Shatila was committed by the Phalangeists, a Christian Arab militia. The IDF was outside the camps might have realized a slaughter of civilians was occurring rather than combat and intervened on behalf of the muslim militias believed to be there, but they didn't. Don't think Israel's inability to recognize what was going on the day after the assassination of the Lebanese President invalidates the authors observations of the direct actions of the IDF.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.