Posted on 12/07/2015 10:09:55 PM PST by UncleRicosFootball
It would have to be related to taking down Islamist recruiting sites, and work with the ISPs, whether they are cooperative or not.
.....................................................
You got it. He was suggesting eliminating Terrorists use of the internet sites to spread their vile recruiting.
First, he out-Cruzed Cruz on Muslim immigration.
Then, he out-Hillaried Hillary on controlling the Internet.
It's called the Primaries.
It might have been "what he said," but the way the language works there's a vast difference between closing something up in terms of plugging a gap and closing something up in terms of shutting it down. My guess is he was speaking of the former.
Trump said what you support. He said nothing at all about rolling up the internet. Ye Gods, how desperate is the media and the establishment.
OMG! Trump really stepped on it! When he said that he wants to talk to AlGore about the internet and how he wants to use it to control people’s minds to think the way he does, I just about spilled my soup. And. And he said he was ordering a golden chair for he Oval Office because that old crap chair that Zer0 uses isn’t up to his stature. OMG! The Donald is more than 20% bad! He makes me pee my pants!
Oh yeah, I believe a man with Trump’s internet savvy said that, mhmmm, sure, yep, makes perfect sense.
You’re out of your teensy little mind; political naif of a n00b.
On the radio today, John of John and Ken, not a conservative but a common sense American, was railing on Twitter and Facebook, and how they are aiding and abetting the recruiters. I think it’s a valid point to get some patriotism in American massive “sites” or platforms. It should be voluntary. These sites should WANT to ban or censor terror recruitment when they find it. They shouldn’t be forced to; they should WANT TO. They should be pressured by people, victims’ families, everyone, and they should do it voluntarily to save lives.
When the line between reality and parody is completely blurred
Do I need to close my tag?
And you’re an arrogant ——. His opinion is as good as yours.
Why bless your heart; didums.
Trump mocked anyone who would object that his plan might violate the freedom of speech, saying "these are foolish people, we have a lot of foolish people."
"We have to go see Bill Gates," Trump said, "and a lot of different people who really understand what's happening and maybe, in some ways, closing that Internet up in some ways."
Trump characterized the problem of Internet extremism by saying, "We're losing a lot of people because of the Internet."
Um. Okay.
Time for Ted.
Related- Good piece at Breitbart:
“.............From there, Cruz proceeded to detail how Rubio is engaging in dishonest attacks. He said:
>>> I’ll note this distinction-Sen. Rubio is arguing that the government needs to have all of our phone records and I assume by extension our emails and even our GPS location, to make us safer. That is not accurate. And it’s the same mistake the Obama administration makes with regard to gun control. Following San Bernardino, what President Obama and Hillary and the liberals say is we should take away the guns of law abiding citizens. What the Obama administration continues failing to do is distinguish between good guys and bad guys. We should protect the constitutional rights of law abiding citizens. You don’t stop the bad guys by taking away our guns-you stop the bad guys by using our guns. We are safer because we are a free and armed populous able to speak out and able to defend our homes and our families. And yet the Obama administration refuses to target the real terrorists and instead tries to undermine the rights of law abiding citizens.
At that point Cruz laid out how radical Islamic terrorists could have been stopped should the Obama administration have wanted to:..........................”
Wow you almost got me there...it is SATIRE
Go to the Daily Dot homepage, just to smell the territory.
Just be willing to invest five minutes. There's no free ride. Invest, inform yourself instead of "waiting to see if this is something he actually said."
It sure sounds like something he'd say. Rambling and disjointed.
Foolish, foolish man
you say: “ Waiting to see if this is something he actually said.”
Since it seems you may be to busy to click on the link - here ya go.
He’s off the wall...
He’s a ‘foolish, foolish person”
http://www.dailydot.com/politics/trump-closing-the-internet-up-in-some-way/
He believes we need to get Bill Gates involved. Did you catch that part?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.