Submission Was the Motive - Turning the world into a graveyard

It's always the same question after a Muslim goes on a deadly rampage. What was the motive? And it's always the same answer. Islam. The word means "submission." It also means "peace" they tell you. Yes. You want peace? Submit to Islam.

Searching for a motive beyond that is like distinguishing between radical and moderate Islamists. It's a fool's game.....

Contrary to [John] Kerry, the November Paris attacks that targeted the Stade de France, the cafes, restaurants and a music venue-all locations frequented by young adults with a joie de vivre-were as rational, from an Islamic point of view,as the Charlie Hebdo attack. This would become immediately obvious to you if you were to drive the 3.5 miles from Tel Aviv to Jaffa one evening. You leave an area teaming with night life, twinkling lights, music, families enjoying dessert while their little ones play tag and scream for the sheer delight of it all, young adults celebrating the completion of their mandatory two-year stint in the army, flirting with each other,sharing a beer.

You arrive at an area that is as inviting as a graveyard. There are no women to be seen, only gangs of young men standing about and smoking. The cafes are joyless. Old men sitting silently beneath posters of Che Guevara. The dim light that escapes into the night outside doesn't begin to mitigate the darkness, for it is a darkness visible. It assaults your senses and your soul.

But Jaffa is Koran compliant,and Tel Aviv is not, just as the targets of the November Paris attacks were not. And that is reason and justification enough for the latter attacks. Paris must be made to submit to Koranic law. It must become like Jaffa............

The history of Islamic expansion and conquest is the history of Christians divided and fighting against themselves. Promises of riches and power by moselms keep sell out Christians fighting for the islamic hordes. It happened in the Balkans with the Boyars, it set off world war one when archduke ferdinand chose the turks over the christian serbs and got shot for his efforts.

Now the Cintons and the entire Washington DC establishment takes arab and moslem money to sell out america. Gun control is the holy grail of American jihad. Take away the american guns and you can take america away from Christians.

The most powerful testament to the division of Christianity is the Cathar heresy in southern France. It spread throughout Europe and was on the verge of eliminating Christianity alltogether due to infighting, backstabbing and power mad Christains. Not until some semblance of unity is wrought will islam be defeated.

Islam is Satan worship.

“Liberalism”—i.e., Cultural Marxism—has no reason and no power to resist Islam because “Liberalism” is also Satan worship.

While I believe Trump when he says he is “pro-life,” and believe he will do some pro-life things, I am not confident that Trump understands that abortion must end or America goes out of existence. America is not just about “winning” and making good business deals. America cannot exist if America is Satanic and not Christian.

Check this out, a Lefty's - call to only allow non-religious people into the country

"...........What of those seemingly impolitic suggestions that we accept only Christian Syrians? Well, not to favor one group of faith-addled folks over another, but exactly how many Jesus-freak "Jihadi Johns" have we seen beheading American journalists? How many Syrian Christians have even so much as suggested burning a Quran (remember that pastor in Florida?), let alone advocated slitting the throats of their religious rivals? At least as far as security goes, accepting Christian Syrian refugees hardly seems like a bad idea. In fact, it seems like a no-brainer.

Over the past year and a half, authorities have arrested at least 66 Muslims (including refugees) in the United States on suspicion of plotting terrorist attacks or supporting ISIS, so clearly, our much-touted vetting procedures leave something to be desired. (Not all were from immigrant communities; four out of 10 were converts to Islam.) If we accept Muslim Syrian asylum seekers, what sort of "margin of error" would be acceptable? What if, say, 13 percent (per the poll mentioned above) of the 10,000 Syrians President Obama hopes to admit prove to be ISIS sympathizers? That would be 1,300 people. Earlier in the year, FBI director James Comey warned of the possibly "thousands" of ISIS supporters already in the United States, which means that "increasingly... the needles" in the haystack "are invisible to us." We've already got these folks on the potential warpath. Is it prudent to add more to their ranks? If we do, we should not delude ourselves about the risks.

To obviate all these problems, why not consider seeking out atheist Syrian asylum seekers, few though they may be? (We have no definitive stats, but there surely are some.) Why pride ourselves on welcoming confessional diversity, when the existence of any sort of confession indicates a predisposition to believe wildly nonsensical propositions on the basis of no evidence whatsoever? Why not affirm our Enlightenment roots and, for the first time, announce we wish to shelter nonbelievers?

As long as President Obama keeps insisting that ISIS has nothing to do with Islam, and that even the suggestion amounts to "an ugly lie," the discourse we need to have about the the Syrian refugee question and the faith of a majority of them will founder, prey to all sorts of political gamesmanship and crass demagoguery.

At the very least, we owe the nonbelieving cohort of displaced Syrians the chance to come to our shores and begin their lives anew. They might just help return us to the Enlightenment principles on which the United States was founded.

And they might also help teach Messieurs Trump, Carson, Cruz and even President Obama a thing or two about the evil inherent in religious faith.

After all, they know it firsthand."

Check it out:

Obama: Man of the World [March 2007]

......"I was a little Jakarta street kid," he said in a wide-ranging interview in his office (excerpts are on my blog, www.nytimes.com/ontheground). He once got in trouble for making faces during Koran study classes in his elementary school, but a president is less likely to stereotype Muslims as fanatics - and more likely to be aware of their nationalism - if he once studied the Koran with them.

Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset."

Moreover, Mr. Obama's own grandfather in Kenya was a Muslim. Mr. Obama never met his grandfather and says he isn't sure if his grandfather's two wives were simultaneous or consecutive, or even if he was Sunni or Shiite. (O.K., maybe Mr. Obama should just give up on Alabama.) Our biggest mistake since World War II has been a lack of sensitivity to other people's nationalism, from Vietnam to Iraq. Perhaps as a result of his background, Mr. Obama has been unusually sensitive to such issues and to the need to project respect rather than arrogance. He has consistently shown great instincts. ..."

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.