Posted on 11/18/2015 6:41:14 AM PST by Isara
Here's Cruz's team just this last Friday:
"While Cruz may not support legalization, he hasn't definitively ruled it out. His position, his campaign said, is that he'll refuse to even discuss what to do with the undocumented population until the border is secure."
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-11-13/did-ted-cruz-actually-support-legal-status-for-undocumented-immigrants-
This is from Cruz and his people, the same ones calling Rubio a liar for claiming that Cruz supported granting legal status and expanding H1-B visas.
Disciplined messenger? Maybe, but the message is telling us that amnesty is still on the table in a Cruz presidency.
Please click on the pictures at the top of the columns for more details on the ratings of the candidates.
Budget, Spending & Debt | ||
Civil Liberties | ||
Education | ||
Energy & Environment | ||
Foreign Policy & Defense | ||
Free Market | ||
Health Care & Entitlements | ||
Immigration | ||
Moral Issues | ||
Second Amendment | ||
Taxes, Economy & Trade |
More at Conservative Review: https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
Note: If you don't like the ratings for any reason, please contact Conservative Review's Editor-in-Chief, "The Great One," Mark Levin. But I have to warn you that you may get this response from him: "GET OFF THE PHONE, YOU BIG DOPE!"
Trump's Record on Free-market Issue: (from the Conservative Review)
Trump has a terrible record on free market issues. The only bright spot is the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing, but this glimmer is countermanded by his repeated support for bailing out Wall Street and the auto industry, and increased stimulus spending. Of particular concern is Trump's belief that the government can use eminent domain powers to seize private property in the name of private economic development. This comes as no surprise, given his support for using eminent domain to profit his own company.
Trump supported the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of London, allowing public authorities to seize private land for economic development by private investors; Trump said, “I happen to agree with [the decision] 100 percent.” (National Review) This is no surprise given Trump’s attempt to use eminent domain in his own line of work. (Institute for Justice)
Trump supported President Obama’s 2009 stimulus, saying: “The word stimulus is probably not used in its fullest…you know, certain of the things that were given weren't really stimulus. They were pork, as we call it, or they were gifts to certain people. But overall, I think he's [President Obama] doing very well. You do need stimulus and you do have to keep the banks alive.” (CNN)
Trump supported TARP, saying, "You had to do something to shore up the banks, because ... you would have had a run on every bank." (CNN)
Trump supported the 2008 auto bailout, saying, “I think the government should stand behind them 100 percent. You cannot lose the auto companies. They’re great. They make wonderful products.” He also said that the federal government could “easily save the companies.” (Daily Caller)
Trump criticized the Federal Reserve’s intervention in the debt market, saying quantitative easing creates “phony numbers” that mislead the marketplace and “will not ultimately benefit the economy. The dollar will go down in value and inflation will start rearing its ugly head.” (CNBC)
Donald Trump has a history of using eminent domain to complete business deals. Multiple times Trump has supported the use of government agencies to take possession of homes and businesses for use in his private business plans. Eminent domain seizures are reserved only for public use of property rather than abuse by the government taking property from one individual and giving to another. (Washington Post)
Donald Trump has sought and received crony capitalist tax breaks for his commercial properties in New York. These tax breaks, and even an abatement, force the property taxes of other property owners to rise at the expense of the connected. Special treatment for one business or industry over another with the tax code conflicts with free market principles. (National Review)
In 2009, Trump supported Barack Obama's call for limits on the pay of executives. (CNN)
America had tremendous economic growth from the founding up until The Great Depression, when immigration was restricted. I don’t think we should necessarily say immigration is a problem. However back in those days immigrants were left largely to their own hard work to make it. Contrast that today with about half of all immigrant headed families getting some welfare assistance (source http://cis.org/Welfare-Use-Immigrant-Native-Households).
I think it’s great to attract the best and brightest from around the world. And further to attract a population with a work ethic much higher than most native born Americans. But along with those, we are getting men and women who can’t seem to make it here either.
We bring in far too many legal immigrants. We have a huge surplus of labor. The labor participation rates are the lowest in 38 years. Immigrants are taking American jobs and depressing wages. If we had a shortage of labor, wages would be going up, not down.
Civilian labor force participation rate
87% of the legal immigrants are minorities as defined by the USG. Immigrants and minorities vote more than two to one Dem. By 2019 half of the children 18 and under will be minorities and by 2043 non-Hispanic whites will be 50% of the population, down from 89% in 1970. The Dems are well on their way to becoming the permanent majority party. Demography is destiny.
How can any rational person call this "controversial" or dispute it?
The sole purpose of H1B visas is to provide U.S. business with cheap engineers and technicians; the sole purpose of farm worker visas is to provide cheap farm labor.
We bring in 1.1 million LEGAL PERMANENT IMMIGRANTS a year who compete legally with Americans for jobs. We issue 65,000 H-1B temporary work visas a year.
Eggheads like this authorette have a hard time dealing with reality.
Eggheads like this authorette have a hard time dealing with reality.
I guess the Free Traitors have realized that their previous stance of 'tough beans for the wages of the lower and middle class - that's the free market' wasn't winning friends ... so they've decided to deny that markets still work the way they've always worked.
The mental gymnastics that is going on denying the obvious is really something to see.
He figured out he couldn't beat Trump any other way. Campaign conversions do not count with me.
Thanks for all those graphs. Just one comment on your destiny comment. Once most blacks voted for republicans. Things do not have to stay the way they are.
That applies to Trump's campaign conversions, too, right?
Nope, he came to that on his own. Cruz had to wait for his donors to let him adapt his message to try and stave off Trump, not because he believes what he is now saying about immigration. Trump has never cast a single vote in either House excepting of course the ones he bought.
Nope, he came to that on his own. [...] Trump has never cast a single vote in either House excepting of course the ones he bought.
'Donald Trump is now the super-hawk on immigration. It wasn't always so, and not so long ago. A Newsmax article from November 2012 on his views on what went wrong in the election is making the rounds. Back then, Trump's view on immigration was utterly conventional â he wanted a "comprehensive solution" to accommodate immigrants who want to be "wonderful productive citizens," and thought Romney's policy of attrition (infamously described as self-deportation) was "maniacal" and mean-spirited' - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3309919/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.