Posted on 11/11/2015 7:00:45 AM PST by jimbo123
OUTSTANDING posts BUMP!
Yeah! Not possible so lets just give up. What the hell? We had a good run for a little over 200 years. Lets turn the greatest nation on Gods earth back into a jungle free for all until its totally consumed by filth and disease. Its the humane thing to do. Moron!
During the 1950s, however, this "Good Old Boy" system changed under Eisenhower - if only for about 10 years.
In 1954, Ike appointed retired Gen. Joseph "Jumpin' Joe" Swing, a former West Point classmate and veteran of the 101st Airborne, as the new INS commissioner.
Influential politicians, including Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) of Texas and Sen. Pat McCarran (D) of Nevada, favored open borders, and were dead set against strong border enforcement, Brownell said. But General Swing's close connections to the president shielded him - and the Border Patrol - from meddling by powerful political and corporate interests.
One of Swing's first decisive acts was to transfer certain entrenched immigration officials out of the border area to other regions of the country where their political connections with people such as Senator Johnson would have no effect.
Then on June 17, 1954, what was called "Operation Wetback" began. Because political resistance was lower in California and Arizona, the roundup of aliens began there. Some 750 agents swept northward through agricultural areas with a goal of 1,000 apprehensions a day.
By the end of July, over 50,000 aliens were caught in the two states. Another 488,000, fearing arrest, had fled the country.
By mid-July, the crackdown extended northward into Utah, Nevada, and Idaho, and eastward to Texas.
By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and an estimated 500,000 to 700,000 illegals had left the Lone Star State voluntarily.
Now, to me, that's in the neighborhood of 1,200,000 in three months.
By my cyphering, we can get rid of the mere 6,000,000 claimed by the doofuses --- in about 12 months!
Of course, not if we keep buying into the mindless "It's impossible!", "Can't be done!" --- and never try.
Isn't that called a self-fulfilling prophecy in the universe of the real?
Just once, I’d like to hear one of the candidates blast the “law abiding” illegals statement.
They got here by breaking the law, therefore they are not law abiding in the first place.
But Chavez, born in Yuma AZ, knew that his cause - the UFW - would itself be comprised by a steady flow of cheap labor. FWIW, I believe it would be a major enlightenment if any conservative candidate would locate such video and have it played before the next debate, over and over again.
Jebbie with TX and FL in the bag thinks he can pander, but what if TX and FL are not in his bag?
I'm surprised nobody picked up on this. Uh, Jeb have you taken a Math test lately? At that rate, it would only take two years to deport them all. In fact, many would self-deport when because of EVerify they couldn't get jobs or benefits.
Can you imagine this dunce having a plan to fix the federal budget?
Operation Wetback 2016 !
The Bushes were Eisenhower Republicans in the 1950s; maybe they have since “evolved” more toward “the democracy”.
I an barely put my distaste for all things Bush into words, and I have voted for all of them in TX except George P. in 2014.
Jeb: “It’s an American value to not enforce our laws - at least not the ones I don’t think should be enforced.”
I.E., I’m no different than Obama!
Let me tread where those who hate the very concept of national sovereignty and ethnicity, have deliberately sought to make Americans afraid to tread.
To make it clear where I am coming from, let me acknowledge that my forbears came from Central & Eastern Europe in the Nineteenth Century. When I refer to the Preamble of the Constitution, and the clear statement of intent, it is not some form of self or family adulation. Like a great many other immigrants in the era, my forebears were drawn to America by an established culture, that appealed to a self-selecting element in many countries; a segment that found the Anglo/Celtic settler values of the Founding Fathers more appealing than they found the values of their neighbors in the lands from which they departed. To me being accepted into America by the posterity of those who created America, entitled those who allowed our acceptance to expect reasonable acceptance of the rights of that posterity and those same American values.
That means that preserving the "Blessings of Liberty," to the posterity of the Founding Fathers, which is set forth as one of the primary purposes of the Constitution, is a sacred obligation of all who have sworn to uphold that Constitution. To people of honor, it seems clear, no equivocation as to the reasonable expectation of a continuation of heritage is acceptable.
Every people define liberty in ways that uniquely reflect their personality traits. There are nuances of those definitions. But those illegal aliens whom Jeb says should not be deported have not behaved in a manner that suggests they are compatible with the ethnic values of the self-reliant, law abiding, conservative community building settlers, whose posterity we are sworn to protect in the enjoyment of the inherent right to enjoy a unique heritage--the basis of what some have called "American Exceptionalism."
That Jeb does not even seem to understand that this is a legitimate issue, is truly pathetic. He is like a conditioned zombie with respect to a "politically correct" dogma, being promoted on many American University campuses since the early Twentieth Century; but a dogma absolutely indefensible to those of us who wish to preserve an American culture.
The Kennedys changed the immigration formula, and not for the better. In the 50’s the population of this then Euro-based country was when immigration visas were issued they were based on the numbers of people in he U.S. of that largest amount of Americans in the 50’s were descended from nationality, or descended from that nationality. The Brits, closed followed by the next, Germans. The Kennedys changed the immigration formula to be based on the size of each country. Therefore, larger sized countries got the highest immigration quotas. Britain had a yearly quota (not including part of Ireland which was separate) of 152,000 I believe, and the quota was seldom filled, and I can’t recall what Germany had, but it was high, and each other European country had their own individual quota. NOW, Britain, Germany, and all of Western Europe has a yearly quota of only 10,000, so you can see how different the population shift has become, and each brings their own culture. Presently it appears headed to a Hispanic majority, but in the future we should all dread the thought of an anti-Christian Islamic America.
The “jobs” issue is a false narrative meant to mislead Americans into thinking that these invaders are really contributing to our society for the betterment of our nation.
THEY ARE LYING.
A Yuge increase in fines and jail time for employing illegal invaders will put an end to this nonsense. It will increase wages so that Americans will take those jobs eliminating the need for an increase in the minimum wage. It may cost you more for certain products but it will be a hellava lot cheaper than continuing to fund Greater Welfareistan.
It is all related. What is un-American is stealing from citizens to give to illegal invaders so they can vote for people who wish to steal more and vote against our interests.
THIS! This is why the establishment is all hands on deck against the people. But more of us have learned their ways.
We will no longer tolerate it. And to quote Darth Vader: They'll be no one to stop us this time.
We will win this fight. Hopefully going away. As in invaders going away.
:-)
The image is too small, wish I could find the source.
I did try to enlarge it.
Also two words need attention the singular "hijo" should be plural for sure, "hijos"
and to be correct, so should "putas".
As written, it addresses a single individual.
What does the Spanish phrase translate as?
Half of South American and 90% of Africa wants to live here Jebbie. Check out this link Jeb:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
... numbers are your friends... they reflect reality... watch the gumballs.
Are we helpless to stop anyone?
Are you nuts Jeb?
If only 60% (of the new 800 million illegals) needs to be supported by the American taxpayer, is that fair?
Is it fair?
Do Americans living here now have to stop sending their kids to college or help their parents because YOU Jebbie want to play 'big man of the world' ON OUR FRIGGIN' DIME? That's sick.
The American taxpayers can hardly afford to send their kids to college... no less help pay back loans because YOU Jebbies and your friends demand the right to bring in cheap labor to compete with our kids? We pay for the college degree and YOU and your fellow elites bring in foreigners who work cheaper and replace our kids? Eff you Jeb.
Disney forced Americans to train their foreign replacements... If there had been a conservative moderator you might have been asked how you felt about that... Join the democrats Jeb - take John Kasich with you. If the two of you can't or won't defend the borders, you're useless.
His exact words...
"If people think we are going to ship 11 million people who are law-abiding, who are in this country, and somehow pick them up at their house and ship them out to Mexico?" Kasich asked. "Think about the families, think about the children. So you know what the answer really is? If they've been law-abiding, they pay a penalty, they get to stay.
Kasich, you slut!
What part of "illegal" don't you understand?? What part of "law-abiding" eludes you?
Had they murdered a few Border Officers on their way in, no problem if they are "law-abiding" thereafter?
WTF?
Playing the witless "children" card was a sweet move. I hope those darling MS-13 gangbanger children appreciate your concern
IDIOT!!
"Good-bye, SOBs (spelled out).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.