Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michels, Precision Pipeline Awarded Contracts for Dakota Access Pipeline
pipelineandgasjournal.com ^ | Nov 2015 | pipelineandgasjournal.com

Posted on 11/06/2015 3:19:04 PM PST by fulltlt

Dakota Access Pipeline, LLC has awarded Michels Pipeline Construction, a Division of Michels Corporation, and Precision Pipeline, LLC construction contracts for multiple segments along the 1,134-mile Dakota Access Pipeline.

Once completed, the project will transport light sweet crude oil from the Bakken and Three Forks production areas in North Dakota to Patoka, IL where shippers will be able to access multiple markets, including Midwest, East Coast and Gulf Coast regions.

Michels and Precision will each construct pipeline segments in North Dakota, South Dakota and Iowa. Ultimately, Dakota Access will sign construction contracts with up to five union contractors.

As part of the agreement, Brownsville, WI-based Michels Pipeline and Eau Claire, WI-based Precision will use 100% union labor, with half of the workers sourced from local halls in each state the pipeline crosses. In anticipation for the project and 2016 demand, Michels and Precision have made commitments exceeding $200 million to Caterpillar, John Deere and Vermeer for heavy construction and related equipment.

Michels, which has a field office in Cedar Rapids, IA, will construct segments in Iowa, South Dakota and North Dakota, totaling 380 miles. Precision will construct segments in Iowa and Illinois, totaling 476 miles. Collectively, Michels and Precision will employ up to 4,000 people per state. The construction companies yet to be named will construct segments in North Dakota.

Dakota Access expects permit approvals by late 2015 with a projected start of construction in early 2016. The pipeline is expected to be in service by late 2016.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; pipeline
Kind of negates the need for the XL pipeline. Funny thing is it doesn't go through Nebraska.
1 posted on 11/06/2015 3:19:04 PM PST by fulltlt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fulltlt

XL was to be for Canadian Sands oil, IIRC.

This is going to transport Bakken oil.

Very different.

Oh well, Trump is going to get that XL started soon as he is President.


2 posted on 11/06/2015 3:43:32 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt

BP spent over a BILLION to upgrade Whitening for heavy crude from Canada.

Everything helps, but more is better.


3 posted on 11/06/2015 3:45:21 PM PST by DUMBGRUNT (The decendents of 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt

This is not related to the Keystone XL bringing in oil from Canada. This will reduce the cost oil now transportation by rail.


4 posted on 11/06/2015 3:46:03 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt

http://www.daplpipelinefacts.com/about/route.html


5 posted on 11/06/2015 3:46:23 PM PST by DUMBGRUNT (The decendents of 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fulltlt

Funny thing is it doesn’t go through Nebraska.

There is probably a reason for that:

http://www.daplpipelinefacts.com/about/route.html


6 posted on 11/06/2015 4:07:17 PM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

This is or was supposed to link up with another line that brings it from Illinois into Beaumont. The other line is an existing one that would be re-purposed.


7 posted on 11/06/2015 6:19:23 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marron

Do you mean from Steele City, Nebraska?

The Keystone portion the connects East-West to Illinois flow to the East to Illinois.


8 posted on 11/06/2015 6:29:41 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I had brief peripheral involvement in a project which would reverse-flow an existing line from Illinois or Indiana into Beaumont. A separate project built a new pipeline to bring the oil from Bakken to meet up with this pipeline, establishing a continuous line all the way from Dakota to the Gulf.

I’m assuming this is the other half of that.


9 posted on 11/06/2015 6:35:04 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
XL was to be for Canadian Sands oil, IIRC.

This is going to transport Bakken oil.

Very different.

10 posted on 11/06/2015 6:37:56 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: . IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson