Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama wants nationwide gun laws to fill in gaps left by local efforts (barf alert)
LA Tiimes ^ | 26 oct 2015 | Christi Parsons

Posted on 10/26/2015 4:55:12 AM PDT by rellimpank

One evening in late August not three blocks from President Obama’s Chicago home, someone in a passing car pulled up to a silver Volkswagen and fired several shots through the driver’s side window, killing the driver, execution-style.

The suspected gang shooting happened close to a playground, an elementary school and a high school, where football practice was wrapping up for the night.

The crime terrified Obama’s old neighbors and highlighted just how closely the problem of gun violence hits for the president as it rages unabated in Chicago. Obama’s home city is at the center of a debate about the effectiveness of the kinds of gun laws the president backs.

Critics say the stream of deadly shootings are proof that gun laws don’t work, given the tough stance Chicago officials adopted toward gun ownership in the 1980s and 1990s.

But Obama’s team believes that Chicago, with its 408 homicides so far this year, is evidence of the need for exactly what he’s pushing: national laws that make it harder to get around the local restrictions simply by driving across a state or city line.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; chicago; guncontrol; obama; rkba; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
--it continues--
1 posted on 10/26/2015 4:55:12 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Missed by 3 blocks?


2 posted on 10/26/2015 4:56:28 AM PDT by basil ( God bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Hey Barack!

There are no “gaps”!

Only a few areas where we’ve avoided government overreach!


3 posted on 10/26/2015 4:58:38 AM PDT by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Obama knows his time is limite to collect the bonuses laid out by accomplishing Soros objectives is drawing to a lose and surely gun confiscation and repeal of the 2nd amendment must have a higher dollar value. It is the one that if removed would cause all of the others to be removed faster with his tyranny going full bore and unimpeded.


4 posted on 10/26/2015 5:05:46 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Obama wants to share Chicago’s great success with strict gun laws with the nation. Chicago is the new standard for gun laws. Oh! praise Obama for looking out for the welfare of all people. He is soooo smart!! (sarc)


5 posted on 10/26/2015 5:05:50 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Obama wants a lot of things he's never going to get.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

6 posted on 10/26/2015 5:07:16 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The "American People" are no longer capable of self-governance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Obama knows his time is limite to collect the bonuses laid out by accomplishing Soros objectives is drawing to a lose and surely gun confiscation and repeal of the 2nd amendment must have a higher dollar value. It is the one that if removed would cause all of the others to be removed faster with his tyranny going full bore and unimpeded.


7 posted on 10/26/2015 5:09:46 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

I wonder what the rate of unsolved homicides is in Chicago as compared with other major cities. Weak law enforcement causes criminals to act more openly. If Chicago solved its gang problem its murder rate would drop.
Liberals want to criminalize the primary protection citizens have against criminal activity. Does this mean liberals promote criminal activity? It would seem so.


8 posted on 10/26/2015 5:12:55 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
< Missed by 3 blocks?


9 posted on 10/26/2015 5:13:29 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

The only Gap is between his ears..

And they are really big ears.


10 posted on 10/26/2015 5:37:34 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (I thought Ethanol was the devil, now i find it is America is an Oligarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Whenever I see these type of articles, I love to read the comments at the source.

The typical Left-winger LA Times reader is all in favor of Obama closing these “loop holes”.

Yet he cannot.

The pesky Constitution stands in his way.

Now before anyone states Obama will just ignore the Constitution outright, do understand that I do not disagree with that point, HOWEVER, he can’t do it alone. He has to order thousands, if not millions of people to violate the Constitution also, and that is a much, much harder nut to crack.

The reason is, we still have lots of conservatives in law enforcement, who would naturally be the king’s army to enforce by violence the king’s order of lawlessness. And they just won’t do it. What is an order that is simply not obeyed? The military, God bless them, take a sacred OATH to the Constitution, and while some, due to money and power, might disavow that oath, that vast majority would rather DIE than violate it.

For the Left, that pesky Constitution stands in the way of Utopia. Changing the Constitution REQUIRES a huge effort, and that must be done by getting people to agree with you and want to make the change, and then vote for those who promise to do so. And that needs to be done by not a national fiat, but a fiat of 50 separate states, or at least 34 states. Sorry, Leftists. You will not get 34 states to agree to change the Constitution on the 2nd Amendment. It is simply not going to happen.

So, stamp your feet, hold your breath, insult, rant, call the rest of us evil, redneck, blood thirsty killers, but we’re not going to give up our gun rights. You will have to find a way to come take them. And you and the President and all the democrats simply do not have the power to do so.

So I’m done arguing with Leftists over gun control. I tell them that they need to change the Constitution through the legal process, and until they do, no law they can come up with can change that.


11 posted on 10/26/2015 5:38:49 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (As we say in the Air Force, "You know you're over the target when you start getting flak!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
"The suspected gang shooting happened close to a playground, an elementary school and a high school, where football practice was wrapping up for the night"

Gosh, If only there had been a law making it illegal to have a gun near there!!

12 posted on 10/26/2015 5:41:19 AM PDT by Mr. K (If it is HilLIARy -vs- Jeb! then I am writing-in Palin/Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The article talks about people driving to neighboring states to buy guns but fails to mention the fact that federal law does not allow the sale of handguns to non-residents. You can only buy a handgun from a dealer in your own state. You’d think that would be a relevant fact. So much for journalism.


13 posted on 10/26/2015 5:54:50 AM PDT by stranger and pilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Blacks killin Blacks. Need to find the root of the problem and get rid of it. Answer is simple, cure is hard.


14 posted on 10/26/2015 5:59:11 AM PDT by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

15 posted on 10/26/2015 6:00:45 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

Planting the seeds for “civil disobedience”.


16 posted on 10/26/2015 6:30:13 AM PDT by Biggirl ("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

“But national laws licensing laws will only regulate the legal market, not the black market.”

*******************************

Something Liberals evidently have no ability to comprehend.


17 posted on 10/26/2015 6:30:21 AM PDT by Qiviut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

The example the article starts with is in Chicago, where some of the toughest gun laws are.

So if some of the nation’s toughest gun laws do not stop gun violence, just what is applying similar laws nation wide going to accomplish??

Other than eventual gun confiscation from the law abiding which eventually leads to totalitarian style socialism or full blown communism. Where only criminals and government goons are permitted to have firearms.

If the GOPe are successful in getting their man as Speaker (Ryan or other CoC op), and screwing the system to get their man as President (Jebster or the like), then it will not be long before they secure their power by backing away from the Second Amendment.

Our nation has an eternal fatal cancer eating away at it’s core. If the NWO has it’s way, once they get enough power, loyalists will be eliminated similar to the opposition of Hitler, Stalin, Mao or Pol Pot.


18 posted on 10/26/2015 7:14:15 AM PDT by redfreedom (Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

There are perhaps 20,000 federal, state, and local gun laws in the United States. The idea that there are still gaps is absurd. All we really need is one gun law; I call it the Second Amendment.

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Sadly, that one essential gun law has the introductory clause, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State . . .” Legally and grammatically, the meaning of that clause is purely explanatory; it tell why the right under discussion exists without modifying that right. America’s enemies, the petty tyrants who realize that an armed population prevents them from going overboard in their control over our lives, want our God-given individual right to defend ourselves restricted in order to remove that barrier to tyranny.

Liberals are at best disgusting and foolish people. Their leaders are worse. Their leaders are evil.


19 posted on 10/26/2015 7:34:48 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Obama wants nationwide gun laws to fill in gaps left by local efforts

No. Eff you, you Muslim gay crack-smoking communist lazy pothead faggot Islamic extremist foreigner.

NO, you cock****er.

20 posted on 10/26/2015 7:37:50 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson