Posted on 10/19/2015 7:27:08 AM PDT by wagglebee
Whenever I post a thread on eugenics the "conservatives" who are all for it come out of the woodwork.
OK, so lets give welfare women a $xxx bonus for accepting sterilization. Would that make you happier?
How about ‘installing’ these on ALL female members of the ROP™ as a condition of entry? If they are removed without authorization (authorization IFF they renounce mohamhead and HIS allah, eat bacon and ham for several meals, pet large black dogs and kiss a Jew or three), they earn a nice, peaceful cell at Gitmo and all children get sent to Christian orphanages.
I would go one further and suggest mandatory sterilization to anyone who goes on welfare.
No, ideally we would let American women to do as they please and stop taxing the worker to pay for their decisions. Anything else heaps another violence on top of the original one.
No, I know a woman who had to temporarily go on welfare after a fire in her apartment building destroyed all her stuff, including the goods for her small business (this was decades ago). She was on for two or three months before getting back on her feet.
If you're on welfare for more than a year, then OK.
Then you are for killing the unborn.
Won't work. You will get endless sob stories about heartless Republicans starving innocent babies. Long-term birth control or sterilization side-steps all that.
Why stop there? Why not sterilize the daughters of welfare recipients?
We can either do something now, or wait for the underclass to grow to the point where the whole welfare system collapses. If the latter, then we will see a lot of dying among the POST-born.
Taxpayer expense????
Like the expense of paying for their multiple births and living expenses?
What do you call owning another human being for profit?
What do you call forcing another human being to work without profit?
You may view me as a nazi, but I view YOU as a SLAVER!
LET'S ABOLISH WIC, SNAP, TANF, AFDC, Section 8, Medicaid ...
I'm quite serious about that. I'm also quite serious about killing babies being seriously evil.
“They should have been IUDed BEFORE they got knocked up.”
I’ve always believed that, too. But what about the men? If they know that every partner, or potential partner, can’t get pregnant, promiscuity will increase. It’ll be a free-for-all for the guys. How about reversible vasectomies for men until they can prove they’re able to be responsible for children?
I’m so sick of having to support these rutting animals and their progeny with our taxes.
I'm cool with abolishing welfare.
Would YOU continue to be cool with it, if it was shown that it resulted in a higher rate of abortion? In other words, if it was shown to you that lack of those federal programs resulted in underclass women who got pregnant choosing abortion, rather than dealing with the expense of raising a baby on her own, would you still be in favor of abolishing welfare?
It only takes one man to potentially impregnate a hundred women. Are you going to advocate sterilization of ALL men, on or off welfare? What will be your criteria for their being able to prove being responsible?
Abortion, whatever the excuse given for it, is the deliberate killing of innocent human persons; it is murder under color of law and therefore inherently evil.
Welfare should be abolished, as other forms of theft are outlawed.
Abortion should be outlawed, as other forms of murder are outlawed.
That's my position, son. Deal with it.
I'm not surprised?
Taxpayer expense????
Like the expense of paying for their multiple births and living expenses?
Where have I EVER supported welfare?
What do you call owning another human being for profit?
What do you call forcing another human being to work without profit?
You may view me as a nazi, but I view YOU as a SLAVER!
So, I am a "slaver" for opposing welfare AND mandatory sterilization?
I’m cool with your position.
It doesn’t go withut saying on this thread that there’s no moral difference between a chemical or mechanical means that prevents an already-created human being from implanting in the uterus and taking a three year-old - or a thirty year-old - and locking them in a closet without food and water until they are dead.
And if the moral argument is of no effect with some of these people, they need to have it explained to them that their own rights are not secure if the supreme right of the most helpless and innocent among us are not secure.
Thank you. FWIW, I apply the same thinking to the illegal alien problem. Serious border protection and immigration law enforcement AND abolish the ‘goodies from the government’ (welfare, driver licenses, etc) that attract them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.