Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marine experiment finds women get injured more frequently, shoot less accurately than men
The Washington Post ^ | September 10, 2015 | Dan Lamothe

Posted on 09/10/2015 3:06:22 PM PDT by Timber Rattler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Timber Rattler

“women get injured more frequently, shoot less accurately “

I’m sure there are plenty of articles written for publication by *ambitious* junior officers saying different.

“I Would Like To Be The First To Buckle With Our New Female Overlords”
by Captain America
Chapter 1 Swallowing Your Vomit


41 posted on 09/10/2015 4:45:41 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Women would make great snipers if their targets were other women cause they’d never miss.


42 posted on 09/10/2015 4:49:01 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

43 posted on 09/10/2015 4:56:32 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
Of course, you are correct. My comment was more directed at the idea of unit cohesion, which seemed to be more the focus of another article on the topic:

"All-male ground combat squads proved faster, stronger and more lethal in most cases than units that included women"

My only point is that, in my opinion, even if women were physically capable, their presence would still diminish combat effectiveness.

44 posted on 09/10/2015 4:57:11 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia

lol


45 posted on 09/10/2015 4:57:45 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

In other news: sun rises in east, Bill Clinton breaks his wedding vows, and fish poop in the ocean.


46 posted on 09/10/2015 5:01:18 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

“Kill a commie for mommie.!” Aah, the good old days.


47 posted on 09/10/2015 5:14:52 PM PDT by semaj (Audentes fortuna juvat: Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold FRiends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Let the males shoot further back with small targets and the females shoot closer with bigger targets. Problems solved.


48 posted on 09/10/2015 5:33:33 PM PDT by bikerman (2015 new motto--- slugs for thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Check out this video on YouTube:

http://youtu.be/HMIyDf3gBoY


49 posted on 09/10/2015 5:40:51 PM PDT by itsLUCKY2B (?Borders, Language, and Culture.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

If it wasn’t for sexist bigotry there would be all female tank crews and gun crews. They could demonstrate their natural superiorty in those venues.


Of course this is really about ticket punching in pursuit of more female eagles and stars.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hey advertisers, thank ME for making this call.


50 posted on 09/10/2015 5:43:56 PM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
This^
51 posted on 09/10/2015 5:48:58 PM PDT by La.daddyrabbit (Obama could f**k-up a cup of coffee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
This^
52 posted on 09/10/2015 5:51:17 PM PDT by La.daddyrabbit (Obama could f**k-up a cup of coffee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

we need to stop experimenting with this nonsense before many get hurt or killed....Women are wonderful, but they should be nowhere near an invasion force of special ops....sorry.


53 posted on 09/10/2015 6:25:30 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Someone will see his career hit a sudden DEAD END.


54 posted on 09/10/2015 6:51:15 PM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

How good are they after humping a full combat load in 115 deg heat for 2 hours? How good are they when all hell is breaking loose in a close ambush? I too know many women who can shoot at paper targets with the best of men. The question the Marine Corps wanted answered was how good can they shoot under extreme mental and physical stress?

The Washington Post didn’t tell the entire story. In the Marine Corps Times the women interviewed after this experiment almost to a tee stated the infantry was not for them. There were 2 that said they could do it, but they wouldn’t have careers as long as men. My beloved Marine Corps did this right. They set up this test so no one could fudge the numbers. The Corps has also stated that there is no way they will water down the standards to appease the morons.


55 posted on 09/10/2015 6:53:44 PM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sean327

I was not addressing that and I do share your concerns.


56 posted on 09/10/2015 6:54:55 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia
...they'd never miss.

Only true if they were shooting them in the back!

57 posted on 09/10/2015 7:05:05 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Today's Democrats are much more Fascist than Communist; but Sen Joe McCarthy was still right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Katelyn van Dam, also took issue with the study, saying it is time to stop asking if women can “hack it” in combat units and instead focus on developing gender-neutral standards that apply to all.

Gender-neutral standards that apply to all?

Why not use the existing male standards? Is that a problem?

100% on the PFT: 20 Pull-ups, 90 Crunches in 2 minutes, 18 minutes for the 3-mile run.

Not many men score 100%. How many women would? Any?

58 posted on 09/10/2015 7:14:16 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Today's Democrats are much more Fascist than Communist; but Sen Joe McCarthy was still right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
In other news: sun rises in east, Bill Clinton breaks his wedding vows, and fish poop in the ocean.

WAIT A SECOND...I swim in the ocean...what's this about fish?????

59 posted on 09/10/2015 8:48:05 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl

Gender-neutral standards that apply to all?


Does that mean male marines now have to sit down to pee?


60 posted on 09/11/2015 5:24:05 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson