Italian Court: No Proof Amanda Knox Was at Murder Scene

Breitbart ^ | 09/07/2015 | Breitbart News

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Who needs evidence against a whoring Washington state Liberal?

Such a quaint idea.

[bgill]

We’ll never know what really happened. The investigation was all over the place and a major train wreck from the start.

[Magic Fingers]

“Why are you always on the opposite side of reasonable logic? Seems you are just argumentative.”

My thoughts exactly, but much more politely stated.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

We do know that the prosecutor was a sexual deviant himself who got gratification from conjuring up lurid scenarios.

[familyop]

"But of course, don’t tell that to Ann Coulter; she’s had a fierce hatred for Knox from the beginning. Bad judge of men (politically & personally), and bad judge of women (who are younger & more attractive than she)."

She could have had a job as a model in a medical school.

[BBell]

She was a slut. And a nasty one at that.

[Bratch]

[Tired of Taxes]

Rudy Gedde acted alone. But who needs logic when there are axes to be ground?

Guede was convicted as an accomplice. The court found that he did not act alone.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Only because the documented pervert prosecutor gratified himself with lurid concocted scenarios that had no basis in fact.

I take it you like your prosecutors on the pervert side?

[Tired of Taxes]

The real reason Guede was convicted as an accomplice - and not as someone acting alone - is based on evidence, such as the lack of defensive wounds and the rearrangement of the crime scene.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Oh, well then that proves it. Not.

[miserare]

Not with another human being’s blood on them.

[miserare]

Dorian Gray

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Yeah, it make so much sense for a couple of affluent young kids to hook up with a low-life Sierra Leone thug and conspire to murder the girl’s roommate.

You decided she’s guilty because you disapprove of her dissolute lifestyle and want to see her punished. For anything.