Just take a look at the masthead of the Birth Control Review, the Journal of the Birth Control League (predecessor to Planned Butcherhood):
In case you think that the masthead might be inartfully worded pap and not their real agenda, please note the title of an article from another issue of that rag:
Or we have this article from April 1933 ("The Sterilization Issue"):
(My question is which leftist determines who is socially inadequate?)
In case this is not sufficient, here's another example. You've heard, of course, of the Negro Project, right? It was an effort to place their eugenic clinics in black neighborhoods...to make sure that their gene pool would be cut off. In this 12/10/1939 letter to Charles Gamble, founder of P&G, she discloses:
If you take a look at page 102 of the April, 1933 issue of the Birth Control Review (Sanger's Journal of her Birth Control League which, after the war, morphed into Planned Butcherhood) you will note an interesting article titled, Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need. The doctor was Dr. Ernst Rüdin. In case you're not familar, Dr. Ernst Rüdin was honored by Hitler as being the "pioneer of the racial-hygienic measures of the Third Reich." He was one of the collaborators of Margaret Sanger.
PP is now attempting to distance themselves from their foundress. Not possible.
Planned Parenthood has devolved into its current baby parts business. Libs hate the words anchor baby, but refuse to acknowledge the words unborn baby.
Perfect to represent the PP Baby Butchers and Meat Packing Co.
She was really a married international playgirl who frequently left her children in the care of nannies while she cavorted with her boyfriends in Europe.
One time she got a transAtlantic call that one of her sons was very sick and she did not even attempt to get home early. She continued to "play" and her son died.
One of her dandies was Havelock Ellis, the transgender king.
Another of her many lovers was the man who developed the original birth control pill, Gregory Pincus.
As you can see, Sanger had her hands in lots of, >ahem<, back pockets.
She had the heart of a Black Widow who had hundreds of tentacles; each one touching some aspect of evil death.
So, PP admits that she made some "harmful statements."
“’Made Some Controversial, Harmful Statements’”
She also founded an organization that has killed millions of helpless human beings.
Nobody’s perfect.
Sanger was against abortion.
Quote; “Despite her eugenic leanings, generally drew the line at abortion. She taught clients at her first clinic “that abortion was the wrong wayno matter how early it was performed it was taking a life” [An Autobiography, 1938] and termed “the killing of babiesinfanticideabortion” the “most barbaric method” of birth control. [My Fight for Birth Control, 1931] She referred to abortionists as “The blood-sucking men with M.D. after their names who perform operations for the price of so-and-so.” [The Woman Rebel, March 1914]”
frederica.com/writings/suffragists-at-the-abortion-march.html
Calling for the elimination of the black race is simply “controversial”, as long as the statement is made by a pro-abort.
Abortion excuses just about everything in these people’s universe.
Hitler made harmful statements, too.
And they have always defended her, and to this day they continue her atrocities, only worse.
BTW, here is one way in which today’s PP is worse than its founder: