Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Solidify His Legacy, Obama Moves World Closer to War
Frontpagemagazine ^ | August 28, 2015 | Ari Lieberman

Posted on 08/28/2015 5:26:39 AM PDT by SJackson

Why the Islamic Republic is readying for war not despite the Iran nuclear accord -- but because of it.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) announced today that she would be voting in favor of a resolution of disapproval against the president’s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action becoming the 14th Democratic congressional lawmaker to buck Obama. Two Senators, Chuck Schumer and Robert Menendez, also announced their intention to vote in favor of a resolution of disapproval.

In explaining her decision, Maloney quite accurately noted that even if Iran doesn’t cheat -- an unlikely prospect given the Islamic Republic’s record of deceit and fabrication -- the Iranians can legally become a threshold nuclear power once many of the restrictive provisions of the JCPOA expire in 8 to 10 years. In the best-case scenario, Obama has merely kicked the can down the road. Moreover, in 8 years, Iran will be a lot richer and infinitely more menacing thanks to sanctions relief as mandated by the JCPOA.

A day prior to Maloney's announcement, a group of nearly 200 retired generals and admirals sent a letter to Congress urging them to reject the deal. Such unanimity among such a high number of senior military officials is impressive and Maloney may have been swayed by their compelling arguments as well as stature. She may be also cognizant of recent opinion polls which are decidedly against approval of the JCPOA.

Notwithstanding Maloney’s intrepid stand, it’s an uphill battle for opponents of the JCPOA. Thus far 29 senators, all Democrats, have aligned themselves with Obama, while 56 senators, including two Democrats, have signaled an intention to vote against the JCPOA. Democrats only need 34 votes to ensure that Obama has sufficient support to sustain a presidential veto. Moreover, if opponents of the deal fail to muster 60 negative votes, supporters of the deal can initiate a senate filibuster and prevent a resolution of disapproval from ever reaching the president’s desk, sparing Obama the need to exercise a veto.

It may sound a bit confusing, but what is not confusing is the fact that Obama’s Iran deal is leading the nation toward the inevitable path of war. With or without the deal, war with the Islamic Republic is a virtual certainty. The only question is will war break out with an economically strong and powerful Iran, equipped with sophisticated weapons purchased from the Russians and Europeans or will it break out while Iran’s military is relatively weak and its economy is in shambles?

Already we are witnessing foreboding signs of Iranian malfeasance. The IAEA announced today that Iran is building an “extension to an existing building” at the top-secret Parchin military facility. IAEA inspectors believe that the facility also serves as a testing site for conducting nuclear experiments with military applications. In early August, the Institute for Science and International Security announced that based on satellite imagery they believed that Iran was attempting to sanitize the Parchin site before any IAEA inspection. The Iranians countered that they were merely engaged in road repair. What is truly amazing is that the ink on the JCPOA hasn’t even dried yet and already, the Iranians are up to their old antics.

. Anticipating an immediate influx of $150 billion as well as billions more resulting from sanctions relief, Iran is now substantially shoring up its military capabilities. Russia announced that it would be selling the Iranians the S-300 weapon system, a state-of the-art anti-aircraft platform capable of tracking and shooting down multiple targets and great distances. Once acquired and integrated, the system will greatly complicate plans for a preemptive strike.

Iran and China are now in the midst of negotiating a deal worth $1 billion whereby Iran would acquire 24 Chinese Chengdu J-10 fighter jets in exchange for granting China control of Iran’s biggest oil field for two decades. Iran’s air force is currently in a decrepit state, flying aircraft that date to the 1950s but the purchase of these sophisticated fourth-generation aircraft will substantially improve Iran’s tactical and strategic capabilities.

Iran is also seeking to transfer sophisticated military technology to its Lebanese Shia proxy, Hezbollah. According to Israel’s foreign ministry director-general Dore Gold, Iran is seeking to transfer Yakhont cruise missiles and SA-22 anti-aircraft missiles to Hezbollah. Both of these weapons systems are game-changing platforms that endanger Israeli commercial and military aircraft as well as offshore gas facilities.

In 1955, Egypt concluded a deal with the Soviet Union (known as the Egyptian-Czech arms deal) whereby the Communist regime would supply Egypt with hundreds of T-34 tanks, artillery, armored personnel carriers, 150 Mig-15 fighters, 50 IL-28 bombers and other ancillary equipment. The delivery of these systems altered the balance of power heavily in favor of the Arabs. Israel estimated that the Egyptians would not be able to fully integrate these systems into their military until 1957. Once the Egyptians succeeded in doing so, however, they would pose a formidable threat to Israel’s security. This was one of the primary factors motivating Israel to launch a preventative war against Egypt in 1956, one year before the Egyptians were capable of absorbing the Soviet hardware.

Iran’s acquisition of these new weapons platforms facilitated by revenue flowing in as a result of the JCPOA and its destablizing transfer of military technology to Israel’s genocidal enemies will merely serve to accelerate Israel’s military response. Though the math looks bad for opponents of the JCPOA, those who are still on the fence line should be cognizant of the fact that Iran is gearing for war not despite the JCPOA, but because of it.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/28/2015 5:26:39 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

2 posted on 08/28/2015 5:28:04 AM PDT by SJackson ("Everybody has a plan until they get hit. Mike Tyson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“Republicans start depressions, Democrats start wars.”


3 posted on 08/28/2015 5:30:43 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I could imagine a war that precipitates this slime to declare martial law and stop the 2016 elections. I put nothing past him and his Marxist handler Jarret


4 posted on 08/28/2015 5:32:14 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

“Republicans start depressions, Democrats start wars.”

Republicans typically fix Democrat recessions.

Part 2 is correct.


5 posted on 08/28/2015 5:48:34 AM PDT by BBB333 (Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

What I don’t get is the 29 Dem Senators aligning with Obama? Are they that freaking stupid not to see the danger even after 200 retired generals voicing the Iran deal opposition? What I’m mostly hearing on the media is what the politicians are saying.. but what are We The People thinking? Where are the polls on that? I suspect this is ANOTHER government ruse being shoved down our throats when the majority are opposed to Obama’s deal.

I’m going to answer my own question on polls:

http://www.pollingreport.com/iran.htm

Depending on who’s conducting the poll and how the question is asked and when - it seems like the public is largely against the Iran deal.


6 posted on 08/28/2015 6:04:09 AM PDT by seeker7_dj (Things work out best for those who make the best of the way things work out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

As much as I pray and hope in the Lord Jesus that we will have the ability to have the 2016 elections, I have felt for a long time that some kind of national ‘emergency’ would unfold (terrorist attacks [major], economic crash, natural disaster) that would enable 0 to execute martial law. With the events unfolding as of late, I really do believe we will be under martial law before this year is up.


7 posted on 08/28/2015 6:06:55 AM PDT by Patriot777 (Imagine....that we could see Obama being hauled out of the White House kicking and screaming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BBB333

““Republicans start depressions, Democrats start wars.””

The MSM starts depressions, the MSM starts wars.

It’s just a question of who the MSM chooses to blame for it.


8 posted on 08/28/2015 6:25:53 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (2016 - Jews for Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Patriot777

Molon Labe. Semper Paratus.


9 posted on 08/28/2015 6:32:21 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
We are living the nightmare of the Perpetual Presidency. All of this is Obama cloning the Clintons' sordid MO to get rich in no time. Obama has two foundations (that we know of) to rake in the money. One foundation intends to raise billions to build his library (gag). The 2nd foundation is run by his Kenyan-half brother.

The presidency is not meant to be a sinecure-- that once their term is up, taxpayers should be forced to endure the ex-presidents closeup---reliving unfinished business. They get 4-8 years at it---if they failed...too frickin' bad.

============================================

Taxpayers demand a say in this----whether Obama should have a never-ending money pit using inside information from our govt.

==============================================

SoS Hillary and her senior staff routinely sent foreign government information among themselves on unsecured networks several times a month... Clinton herself sent at least 17 emails that contained privileged information..... to a friend, Sidney Blumenthal, not in government.

DOCUMENTED CONSPIRACY AND COLLUSION TO DECEIVE-- In 2009, the Clintons duped the public, the Clinton Foundation's Board of Directors, and its wealthy donors by announcing Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time adviser to both Clintons, had been hired...... (wait for it) "to work at the Clinton Foundation on a project to promote Bill Clinton’s presidential legacy. "

(waiting for hysterical laughter to die down)

But Sid's secret emails show that, while on the foundation payroll, ostensibly "promoting Bill's legacy," Blumenthal was privy to valuable inside info...that was useful to his clients.....and to the Clinton's incessant buck-raking. The Clintons' con game is being copied by Obama....in order to rake in honoraria, consultancies, foundation donations, insider business deals.

You can bet your sweet bippie the greedy Obamas are salivating over their cut from the $150 BILLION Iran deal.

10 posted on 08/28/2015 6:36:56 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If he succeeds in destroying “The Great Satan” - America - his praises will be sung in every mosque for thousands of years.

How much more glory, how much greater a legacy could any muslim aspire to?


11 posted on 08/28/2015 6:37:32 AM PDT by null and void (Send them all back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
A resolution of disapproval makes OTrauma laugh.

"How many divisions does Congress have? HHAHHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHAHHA!!!!"

12 posted on 08/28/2015 6:39:23 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Ok. We won't call them 'Anchor Babies'. From now on, we shall call them 'Fetal Grappling Hooks'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

“You furnish the pictures and I’ll furnish the war.” – William Randolph Hearst, January 25, 1898


13 posted on 08/28/2015 6:39:49 AM PDT by null and void (Send them all back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

In order to engage in yet another land war in Asia, we will need to print more money


14 posted on 08/28/2015 6:50:41 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“Notwithstanding Maloney’s intrepid stand”

There was no intrepid stand. The senate only needs something like 30 votes to approve it when they fast tracked Obama. Then they allocated who could loudly pontificate against it.

Another fedgov uniparty scam.


15 posted on 08/28/2015 7:12:10 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but comSUrfmunists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“Democrats only need 34 votes to ensure that Obama has sufficient support to sustain a presidential veto. Moreover, if opponents of the deal fail to muster 60 negative votes, supporters of the deal can initiate a senate filibuster and prevent a resolution of disapproval from ever reaching the president’s desk, sparing Obama the need to exercise a veto.”

But remember, the GOP runs the senate! We ran, won, and set the rules now!


16 posted on 08/28/2015 7:16:31 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but comSUrfmunists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot777

The great test was the Civil War and the elections held during that time including Lincoln’s reelection Obama will leave office post election


17 posted on 08/28/2015 10:26:12 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dreaml)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Some legacy.

“So long, mom. I’m off to drop a bomb...


18 posted on 08/29/2015 3:19:49 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson